• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于早期前列腺癌的医患沟通:整体就诊结构分析

Patient-physician communication about early stage prostate cancer: analysis of overall visit structure.

作者信息

Henry Stephen G, Czarnecki Danielle, Kahn Valerie C, Chou Wen-Ying Sylvia, Fagerlin Angela, Ubel Peter A, Rovner David R, Alexander Stewart C, Knight Sara J, Holmes-Rovner Margaret

机构信息

Division of General Medicine, Geriatrics, and Bioethics, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.

Department of Sociology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2015 Oct;18(5):1757-68. doi: 10.1111/hex.12168. Epub 2013 Dec 22.

DOI:10.1111/hex.12168
PMID:24372758
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4370798/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We know little about patient-physician communication during visits to discuss diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the overall visit structure and how patients and physicians transition between communication activities during visits in which patients received new prostate cancer diagnoses.

PARTICIPANTS

Forty veterans and 18 urologists at one VA medical centre.

METHODS

We coded 40 transcripts to identify major communication activities during visits and used empiric discourse analysis to analyse transitions between activities.

RESULTS

We identified five communication activities that occurred in the following typical sequence: 'diagnosis delivery', 'risk classification', 'options talk', 'decision talk' and 'next steps'. The first two activities were typically brief and involved minimal patient participation. Options talk was typically the longest activity; physicians explicitly announced the beginning of options talk and framed it as their professional responsibility. Some patients were unsure of the purpose of visit and/or who should make treatment decisions.

CONCLUSION

Visits to deliver the diagnosis of early stage prostate cancer follow a regular sequence of communication activities. Physicians focus on discussing treatment options and devote comparatively little time and attention to discussing the new cancer diagnosis. Towards the goal of promoting patient-centred communication, physicians should consider eliciting patient reactions after diagnosis delivery and explaining the decision-making process before describing treatment options.

摘要

背景

我们对在讨论前列腺癌诊断和治疗的就诊过程中患者与医生之间的沟通了解甚少。

目的

研究在患者初次被诊断为前列腺癌的就诊过程中的整体就诊结构,以及患者和医生在沟通活动之间是如何过渡的。

参与者

一家退伍军人医疗中心的40名退伍军人和18名泌尿科医生。

方法

我们对40份就诊记录进行编码,以确定就诊期间的主要沟通活动,并使用实证话语分析来分析活动之间的过渡。

结果

我们确定了五个按以下典型顺序发生的沟通活动:“诊断告知”“风险分类”“方案讨论”“决策讨论”和“后续步骤”。前两个活动通常很简短,患者参与度很低。方案讨论通常是最长的活动;医生明确宣布方案讨论开始,并将其视为自己的专业职责。一些患者不确定就诊目的和/或应由谁做出治疗决定。

结论

初次诊断早期前列腺癌的就诊遵循常规的沟通活动顺序。医生专注于讨论治疗方案,而在讨论新的癌症诊断方面投入的时间和精力相对较少。为了实现促进以患者为中心的沟通这一目标,医生应考虑在诊断告知后引发患者的反应,并在描述治疗方案之前解释决策过程。

相似文献

1
Patient-physician communication about early stage prostate cancer: analysis of overall visit structure.关于早期前列腺癌的医患沟通:整体就诊结构分析
Health Expect. 2015 Oct;18(5):1757-68. doi: 10.1111/hex.12168. Epub 2013 Dec 22.
2
Physician communication regarding prostate cancer screening: analysis of unannounced standardized patient visits.医生在前列腺癌筛查方面的沟通:非计划性标准化患者就诊分析。
Ann Fam Med. 2013 Jul-Aug;11(4):315-23. doi: 10.1370/afm.1509.
3
Pairing physician education with patient activation to improve shared decisions in prostate cancer screening: a cluster randomized controlled trial.将医生教育与患者激活相结合,以改善前列腺癌筛查中的共同决策:一项群组随机对照试验。
Ann Fam Med. 2013 Jul-Aug;11(4):324-34. doi: 10.1370/afm.1550.
4
Informed Decision Making: Assessment of the Quality of Physician Communication about Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment.知情决策:对医生关于前列腺癌诊断与治疗沟通质量的评估
Med Decis Making. 2015 Nov;35(8):999-1009. doi: 10.1177/0272989X15597226. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
5
Decision aid use during post-biopsy consultations for localized prostate cancer.前列腺癌活检后咨询中决策辅助工具的使用。
Health Expect. 2018 Feb;21(1):279-287. doi: 10.1111/hex.12613. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
6
Five-year downstream outcomes following prostate-specific antigen screening in older men.老年男性前列腺特异性抗原筛查后的 5 年随访结果。
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 May 27;173(10):866-73. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.323.
7
National evidence on the use of shared decision making in prostate-specific antigen screening.国家关于在前列腺特异性抗原筛查中使用共同决策的证据。
Ann Fam Med. 2013 Jul-Aug;11(4):306-14. doi: 10.1370/afm.1539.
8
Shared decision making, contextualized.情境化的共同决策。
Ann Fam Med. 2013 Jul-Aug;11(4):303-5. doi: 10.1370/afm.1551.
9
Physician Consultations, Prostate Cancer Knowledge, and PSA Screening of African American Men in the Era of Shared Decision-Making.共同决策时代非裔美国男性的医生咨询、前列腺癌知识与前列腺特异性抗原筛查
Am J Mens Health. 2018 Jul;12(4):751-759. doi: 10.1177/1557988318763673. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
10
Do Men Receive Information Required for Shared Decision Making About PSA Testing? Results from a National Survey.男性是否获得了关于前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测共同决策所需的信息?一项全国性调查的结果。
J Cancer Educ. 2016 Dec;31(4):693-701. doi: 10.1007/s13187-015-0870-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of the SHARE Approach for Improving Clinician Shared Decision Making Skills: A Trial in 12 Practices Located in Colorado, USA.SHARE方法在提高临床医生共同决策技能方面的有效性:在美国科罗拉多州12家医疗机构进行的一项试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Sep 10. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09465-y.
2
Philosophy leading the way: An interdisciplinary approach to study communication of severe diagnoses.哲学引领前路:一种跨学科的方法来研究严重诊断的沟通。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 22;19(7):e0305937. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305937. eCollection 2024.
3
The Challenge of Coming Out to Providers by Gay and Bisexual Men With Prostate Cancer: Qualitative Results from the Study.男同性恋和双性恋前列腺癌患者向医疗服务提供者公开性取向的挑战:该研究的定性结果
Int J Sex Health. 2021;33(3):426-438. doi: 10.1080/19317611.2021.1924335. Epub 2021 Aug 13.
4
Experiences of 'traditional' and 'one-stop' MRI-based prostate cancer diagnostic pathways in England: a qualitative study with patients and GPs.英格兰“传统”和“一站式”基于 MRI 的前列腺癌诊断途径的体验:一项有患者和全科医生参与的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 26;12(7):e054045. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054045.
5
Preparing Patients with Early Stage Prostate Cancer to Participate in Clinical Appointments Using a Shared Decision Making Training Video.使用共享决策制定培训视频准备早期前列腺癌患者参加临床预约。
Med Decis Making. 2022 Apr;42(3):364-374. doi: 10.1177/0272989X211028563. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
6
Patient Participation in Communication about Treatment Decision-Making for Localized Prostate Cancer during Consultation Visits.患者在门诊就诊期间参与局限性前列腺癌治疗决策沟通的情况。
Health N Hav. 2015 Nov;7(11):1419-1429. doi: 10.4236/health.2015.711156. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
7
Visit Linearity in Primary Care Visits for Patients with Chronic Pain on Long-term Opioid Therapy.考察长期阿片类药物治疗慢性疼痛患者的初级保健就诊的线性情况。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Jan;37(1):78-86. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06917-z. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
8
Utilizing Digital Health to Collect Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes in Prostate Cancer: Single-Arm Pilot Trial.利用数字健康收集前列腺癌患者自我报告的电子结局:单臂试点试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Mar 25;22(3):e12689. doi: 10.2196/12689.
9
Decision aid use during post-biopsy consultations for localized prostate cancer.前列腺癌活检后咨询中决策辅助工具的使用。
Health Expect. 2018 Feb;21(1):279-287. doi: 10.1111/hex.12613. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
10
A Qualitative Investigation on Patient Empowerment in Prostate Cancer.前列腺癌患者赋权的定性研究
Front Psychol. 2017 Jul 26;8:1215. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01215. eCollection 2017.

本文引用的文献

1
Improving the communication of benefits and harms of treatment strategies: decision AIDS for localized prostate cancer treatment decisions.改善治疗策略的获益与风险沟通:局限性前列腺癌治疗决策辅助工具
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2012 Dec;2012(45):197-201. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgs023.
2
Radical prostatectomy versus observation for localized prostate cancer.根治性前列腺切除术与观察等待治疗局限性前列腺癌的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Jul 19;367(3):203-13. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1113162.
3
Risk communication and prostate cancer: identifying which summary statistics are best understood by men.风险沟通和前列腺癌:确定哪些汇总统计数据最能被男性理解。
Am J Mens Health. 2012 Nov;6(6):497-504. doi: 10.1177/1557988312453616. Epub 2012 Jul 12.
4
Who makes the decision regarding the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer--the patient or physician?: results from a population-based study.谁来决定局限性前列腺癌的治疗方案——是患者还是医生?:一项基于人群的研究结果。
Cancer. 2013 Jan 15;119(2):421-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27738. Epub 2012 Jul 11.
5
Communication skills training for oncology professionals.肿瘤专业人员沟通技巧培训。
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Apr 10;30(11):1242-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.6184. Epub 2012 Mar 12.
6
Shared decision making: prostate cancer patients' appraisal of treatment alternatives and oncologists' eliciting and responding behavior, an explorative study.共同决策:前列腺癌患者对治疗方案的评估及肿瘤医生的启发与回应行为,一项探索性研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Dec;85(3):e251-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.05.012. Epub 2011 Jun 11.
7
Measuring patient-centered communication in cancer care: a literature review and the development of a systematic approach.测量癌症护理中的以患者为中心的沟通:文献综述和系统方法的发展。
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Apr;72(7):1085-95. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.01.020. Epub 2011 Mar 4.
8
Facilitating patient-centered cancer communication: a road map.促进以患者为中心的癌症沟通:路线图。
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Dec;77(3):319-21. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.11.003.
9
Physician response to "by-the-way" syndrome in primary care.初级保健中对“顺便说一下”综合征的医生反应。
J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Jun;24(6):739-41. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-0980-2. Epub 2009 Apr 24.
10
Discourse analysis.话语分析
BMJ. 2008 Aug 7;337:a879. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a879.