• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前列腺癌患者赋权的定性研究

A Qualitative Investigation on Patient Empowerment in Prostate Cancer.

作者信息

Renzi Chiara, Fioretti Chiara, Oliveri Serena, Mazzocco Ketti, Zerini Dario, Alessandro Ombretta, Rojas Damaris P, Jereczek-Fossa Barbara A, Pravettoni Gabriella

机构信息

Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of OncologyMilan, Italy.

Interdisciplinary Research and Intervention on Decision, Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of MilanMilan, Italy.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2017 Jul 26;8:1215. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01215. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01215
PMID:28798701
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5526923/
Abstract

Men with prostate cancer often describe low levels of empowerment. eHealth interventions may represent useful tools to deliver care and education and to meet patients' needs within an empowerment framework. In order to design a platform for cancer patients' empowerment within the H2020 iManageCancer project, the perspective of the target population for the platform was assessed. The present study aims to assess the qualitative experience of prostate cancer patients during treatment in order to provide insights for clinical practice with a particular focus on the design of a web platform to promote cancer patients' empowerment. Ten patients undergoing radiation therapy treatment took part in a semi-structured interview to explore different aspects of patient empowerment. Four main thematic areas were addressed: patient-healthcare providers' communication, decision-making, needs, and resources. A qualitative approach using thematic analysis was followed. Half of the patients reported little to no possibility to share information and questions with healthcare providers. With regards to decision-making, the role of healthcare providers was perceived as directive/informative, but half of the patients perceived to assume an active role in at least one interaction. Difficulties and needs included the choice of the specialist or of the structure after diagnosis, clinicians' support in self-management, surgical consequences, and side effects, preparation for radiation therapy. Resources included family and social support both from a practical and from an emotional perspective, coping style, and work schedule management. These results suggest that relations with healthcare providers should be supported, especially immediately after diagnosis and after surgery. Support to self-management after surgery and at the beginning of radiation therapy treatment also constitutes a priority. The adoption of a personalized approach from the beginning of prostate cancer care flow may promote patient empowerment, overcoming the aforementioned needs and mobilizing resources. The social network represents an important resource that could be integrated in interventions. These considerations will be taken into account in the design of a cancer self-management platform aiming to increase patients' empowerment.

摘要

前列腺癌患者常常表示自身的赋权水平较低。电子健康干预措施可能是在赋权框架内提供护理和教育以及满足患者需求的有用工具。为了在“地平线2020 - iManageCancer”项目中设计一个促进癌症患者赋权的平台,对该平台目标人群的观点进行了评估。本研究旨在评估前列腺癌患者在治疗期间的定性体验,以便为临床实践提供见解,特别关注促进癌症患者赋权的网络平台设计。十名接受放射治疗的患者参与了半结构化访谈,以探讨患者赋权的不同方面。访谈涉及四个主要主题领域:患者与医疗服务提供者的沟通、决策、需求和资源。采用了主题分析的定性方法。一半的患者表示几乎没有或根本没有机会与医疗服务提供者分享信息和问题。关于决策,医疗服务提供者的角色被认为是指导性/提供信息性的,但一半的患者认为自己在至少一次互动中发挥了积极作用。困难和需求包括诊断后专科医生或机构的选择、临床医生在自我管理方面的支持、手术后果和副作用、放射治疗准备。资源包括来自家庭和社会在实际和情感方面的支持、应对方式以及工作时间管理。这些结果表明,应加强与医疗服务提供者的关系,尤其是在诊断后和手术后立即加强。术后和放射治疗开始时对自我管理的支持也至关重要。从前列腺癌护理流程开始就采用个性化方法可能会促进患者赋权,克服上述需求并调动资源。社交网络是可以纳入干预措施的重要资源。在设计旨在增强患者赋权的癌症自我管理平台时将考虑这些因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aa7/5526923/2c0c412ca5d0/fpsyg-08-01215-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aa7/5526923/239823d7e536/fpsyg-08-01215-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aa7/5526923/2c0c412ca5d0/fpsyg-08-01215-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aa7/5526923/239823d7e536/fpsyg-08-01215-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aa7/5526923/2c0c412ca5d0/fpsyg-08-01215-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
A Qualitative Investigation on Patient Empowerment in Prostate Cancer.前列腺癌患者赋权的定性研究
Front Psychol. 2017 Jul 26;8:1215. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01215. eCollection 2017.
2
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
3
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
4
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
5
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
6
Patients' and family caregivers' experiences and perceptions about factors hampering or facilitating patient empowerment for self-management of hypertension and diabetes in Cameroon.喀麦隆患者及其家属对影响高血压和糖尿病患者自我管理能力增强的因素的体验和看法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Nov 21;22(1):1381. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08750-4.
7
A qualitative study of patient and provider perspectives on using web-based pain coping skills training to treat persistent cancer pain.一项关于患者和提供者使用基于网络的疼痛应对技能训练治疗持续性癌症疼痛的观点的定性研究。
Palliat Support Care. 2018 Apr;16(2):155-169. doi: 10.1017/S1478951517000086. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
8
Modular ICT-based patient empowerment framework for self-management of diabetes: Design perspectives and validation results.基于信息通信技术的模块化糖尿病自我管理患者赋权框架:设计视角与验证结果
Int J Med Inform. 2016 Jul;91:31-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.04.006. Epub 2016 Apr 16.
9
An evaluation of oncofertility decision support resources among breast cancer patients and health care providers.一项针对乳腺癌患者和医疗服务提供者的肿瘤生育力决策支持资源评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Feb 6;19(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-3901-z.
10
iManageMyHealth and iSupportMyPatients: mobile decision support and health management apps for cancer patients and their doctors.“我管理我的健康”与“我支持我的患者”:面向癌症患者及其医生的移动决策支持与健康管理应用程序。
Ecancermedicalscience. 2018 Jul 11;12:848. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2018.848. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Treatment decision-making and treatment experiences in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌男性患者的治疗决策与治疗经历
Acta Oncol. 2025 Mar 24;64:462-469. doi: 10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42748.
2
Digital Age Transformation in Patient-Physician Communication: 25-Year Narrative Review (1999-2023).医患沟通中的数字时代转型:25年叙事性综述(1999 - 2023)
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 16;27:e60512. doi: 10.2196/60512.
3
Qualitative studies on men with prostate cancer: a systematic meta-synthesis.

本文引用的文献

1
Narrating positive versus negative memories of illness: does narrating influence the emotional tone of memories?讲述疾病的积极与消极记忆:讲述是否会影响记忆的情感基调?
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2017 May;26(3). doi: 10.1111/ecc.12524. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
2
Psycho-emotional tools for better treatment adherence and therapeutic outcomes for cancer patients.用于提高癌症患者治疗依从性和治疗效果的心理情感工具。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2016;224:129-34.
3
Patient Empowerment through Personal Medical Recommendations.通过个性化医疗建议实现患者赋权。
关于前列腺癌男性患者的定性研究:一项系统的元综合分析。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2025 Dec;20(1):2436720. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2024.2436720. Epub 2024 Dec 24.
4
Gender Differences in Self-Advocacy Among Cancer Survivors: How Women and Men Vary in How They Learn to Engage in Decision-Making and Social Support.癌症幸存者自我维权中的性别差异:男性与女性在学习参与决策和社会支持方式上的不同表现
J Cancer Educ. 2024 Nov 2. doi: 10.1007/s13187-024-02536-4.
5
Men's perceptions and preferences regarding prostate cancer radiation therapy: A systematic scoping review.男性对前列腺癌放射治疗的认知与偏好:一项系统性综述。
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2022 Oct 25;38:28-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.10.007. eCollection 2023 Jan.
6
Perceptions and recall of treatment for prostate cancer: A survey of two populations.前列腺癌治疗的认知与回忆:对两类人群的调查
Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol. 2022 Oct 19;24:78-85. doi: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2022.10.001. eCollection 2022 Dec.
7
Regulation strategies during COVID-19 quarantine: The mediating effect of worry on the links between coping strategies and anxiety.新冠疫情隔离期间的调节策略:担忧在应对策略与焦虑之间关系中的中介作用。
Eur Rev Appl Psychol. 2022 Nov;72(6):100671. doi: 10.1016/j.erap.2021.100671. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
8
Coping With Oral Tongue Cancer and COVID-19 Infection.应对口腔舌癌与新冠病毒感染
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jun 16;12:562502. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.562502. eCollection 2021.
9
The Motivation Journey: A Grounded Theory Study on Female Cancer Survivors' Experience of a Psychological Intervention for Quality of Life.动机之旅:一项关于女性癌症幸存者心理干预对生活质量影响的扎根理论研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 22;18(3):950. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18030950.
10
Exploring public attitude toward biofeedback technologies: Knowledge, preferences and personality tendencies.探索公众对生物反馈技术的态度:知识、偏好和个性倾向。
J Public Health Res. 2020 Nov 11;9(4):1782. doi: 10.4081/jphr.2020.1782. eCollection 2020 Oct 14.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;216:1117.
4
Development and psychometric testing of a breast cancer patient-profiling questionnaire.一份乳腺癌患者概况调查问卷的编制与心理测量学测试
Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2015 Jun 1;7:133-46. doi: 10.2147/BCTT.S80014. eCollection 2015.
5
Living with chronic illness in adults: a concept analysis.成人慢性病患者的生活:一项概念分析。
J Clin Nurs. 2015 Sep;24(17-18):2357-67. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12827. Epub 2015 May 6.
6
Survivorship and improving quality of life in men with prostate cancer.前列腺癌男性的生存和生活质量改善。
Eur Urol. 2015 Sep;68(3):374-83. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.04.023. Epub 2015 May 1.
7
Symptoms, unmet needs, psychological well-being and health status in survivors of prostate cancer: implications for redesigning follow-up.前列腺癌幸存者的症状、未满足的需求、心理健康状况和健康状态:对重新设计随访的启示
BJU Int. 2016 Jun;117(6B):E10-9. doi: 10.1111/bju.13122. Epub 2015 May 23.
8
Decision aids for localized prostate cancer treatment choice: Systematic review and meta-analysis.局部前列腺癌治疗选择的决策辅助工具:系统评价和荟萃分析。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 May-Jun;65(3):239-51. doi: 10.3322/caac.21272. Epub 2015 Mar 12.
9
Improving access to supportive cancer care through an eHealth application: a qualitative needs assessment among cancer survivors.通过电子健康应用程序改善癌症支持性护理的可及性:癌症幸存者的定性需求评估
J Clin Nurs. 2015 May;24(9-10):1367-79. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12753. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
10
Identifying the unmet supportive care needs of men living with and beyond prostate cancer: A systematic review.识别前列腺癌患者及康复后男性未满足的支持性护理需求:一项系统综述。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2015 Aug;19(4):405-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2014.12.007. Epub 2015 Jan 19.