Cavallo Jaime A, Roma Andres A, Jasielec Mateusz S, Ousley Jenny, Creamer Jennifer, Pichert Matthew D, Baalman Sara, Frisella Margaret M, Matthews Brent D, Deeken Corey R
*Department of Surgery, Section of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO †Department of Anatomic Pathology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH ‡Department of Biostatistics, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO §Meharry Medical College, Nashville, TN; and ¶William Beaumont Army Medical Center, El Paso, TX.
Ann Surg. 2015 Feb;261(2):405-15. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000471.
The study purpose was to evaluate the associations between patient characteristics or surgical site classifications and the histologic remodeling scores of biologic meshes biopsied from abdominal soft tissue repair sites in the first attempt to generate a multivariable risk-prediction model of nonconstructive remodeling.
Host characteristics and surgical site assessments may predict remodeling degree for biologic meshes used to reinforce abdominal tissue repair sites.
Biologic meshes were biopsied from the abdominal tissue repair sites of n = 40 patients during an abdominal reexploration, stained with hematoxylin and eosin, and evaluated according to a semi-quantitative scoring system for remodeling characteristics (cell types, cell infiltration, extracellular matrix deposition, scaffold degradation, fibrous encapsulation, and neovascularization) and a mean composite score. Biopsies were stained with Sirius Red and Fast Green and analyzed to determine the collagen I:III ratio. On the basis of univariate analyses between subject clinical characteristics or surgical site classification and the histologic remodeling scores, cohort variables were selected for multivariable regression models using P ≤ 0.200.
The model selection process for cell infiltration score yielded 2 variables: age at mesh implantation and mesh classification (C statistic = 0.989). For the mean composite score, the model selection process yielded 2 variables: age at mesh implantation and mesh classification (r = 0.449).
These preliminary results constitute the first steps in generating a risk-prediction model that predicts the patients and clinical circumstances most likely to experience nonconstructive remodeling of abdominal tissue repair sites with biologic mesh reinforcement.
本研究旨在评估患者特征或手术部位分类与从腹部软组织修复部位活检的生物补片组织学重塑评分之间的关联,首次尝试建立非建设性重塑的多变量风险预测模型。
宿主特征和手术部位评估可能预测用于加强腹部组织修复部位的生物补片的重塑程度。
在40例患者的腹部再次探查术中,从腹部组织修复部位获取生物补片活检样本,用苏木精和伊红染色,并根据重塑特征(细胞类型、细胞浸润、细胞外基质沉积、支架降解、纤维包裹和新生血管形成)的半定量评分系统及平均综合评分进行评估。活检样本用天狼星红和固绿染色,分析确定Ⅰ型与Ⅲ型胶原比例。基于受试者临床特征或手术部位分类与组织学重塑评分之间的单变量分析,选择队列变量用于多变量回归模型,P≤0.200。
细胞浸润评分的模型选择过程产生了2个变量:补片植入时的年龄和补片分类(C统计量=0.989)。对于平均综合评分,模型选择过程产生了2个变量:补片植入时的年龄和补片分类(r=0.449)。
这些初步结果是建立风险预测模型的第一步,该模型可预测最有可能经历生物补片加强的腹部组织修复部位非建设性重塑的患者和临床情况。