Karam Oliver, Tucci Marisa, Combescure Christophe, Lacroix Jacques, Rimensberger Peter C
Pediatric Critical Care Unit, Geneva University Hospital, 6 rue Willy Donzé, Geneva, Switzerland, 1211.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 28;2013(12):CD010654. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010654.pub2.
Although plasma transfusions are frequently prescribed for critically ill patients, most clinical uses of plasma are not supported by evidence. Plasma transfusions do not seem to correct mild coagulation abnormalities based on international normalised ratio (INR) testing, but they seem to be independently associated with worse clinical outcomes in non-massively bleeding patients. Current recommendations on plasma transfusion strategies advocate limiting plasma transfusions to patients who are actively bleeding or who are at risk of bleeding and concomitantly have moderately abnormal coagulation tests.
To determine whether use of a restrictive versus a liberal plasma transfusion threshold affects mortality or morbidity in critically ill patients, and to assess the clinical effects of different plasma transfusion thresholds in critically ill patients.
A search for studies was run on 15 August 2013. We searched the Cochrane Injuries Group Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE(R) Ovid, MEDLINE(R) Ovid In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, MEDLINE(R) Ovid Daily and OLDMEDLINE(R) Ovid, EMBASE Classic + EMBASE (Ovid SP), reference lists, related websites and trial registries and checked lists of references.
Randomised clinical trials that assessed the effects of two plasma transfusion strategies, using a restrictive and a liberal threshold of at least one coagulation test, in critically ill participants.
Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed trial quality using the standard methods of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.
Of 843 references identified by our search, none of the trials satisfied our predefined inclusion criteria. No studies are included in this review.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This review highlights the lack of evidence that is available to guide plasma transfusions in critically ill patients. Randomised controlled trials are needed to determine the appropriate plasma transfusion strategy in critically ill patients.
尽管经常为重症患者开具血浆输注处方,但血浆的大多数临床应用并无证据支持。基于国际标准化比值(INR)检测,血浆输注似乎无法纠正轻度凝血异常,但在非大量出血患者中,血浆输注似乎与更差的临床结局独立相关。目前关于血浆输注策略的建议主张,将血浆输注限制在有活动性出血或有出血风险且凝血检测中度异常的患者。
确定采用限制性与宽松性血浆输注阈值是否会影响重症患者的死亡率或发病率,并评估不同血浆输注阈值对重症患者的临床影响。
于2013年8月15日进行研究检索。我们检索了Cochrane损伤组专业注册库、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(CENTRAL)、Ovid MEDLINE(R)、Ovid MEDLINE(R)在研及其他非索引引文、Ovid MEDLINE(R)每日资讯和Ovid OLDMEDLINE(R)、EMBASE经典版+EMBASE(Ovid SP)、参考文献列表、相关网站及试验注册库,并检查了参考文献清单。
评估两种血浆输注策略效果的随机临床试验,这两种策略分别采用至少一项凝血检测的限制性阈值和宽松性阈值,研究对象为重症参与者。
两位综述作者独立提取数据,并采用《Cochrane干预性系统评价手册》的标准方法评估试验质量。
在我们检索到的843篇参考文献中,没有一项试验满足我们预先设定的纳入标准。本综述未纳入任何研究。
本综述凸显了缺乏可用于指导重症患者血浆输注的证据。需要进行随机对照试验来确定重症患者合适的血浆输注策略。