• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在接受根治性放疗的新诊断为 Gleason 评分 7-10 前列腺癌中,嗜铬粒蛋白 A 染色作为预后变量。

Chromogranin A staining as a prognostic variable in newly diagnosed Gleason score 7-10 prostate cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, Michigan.

出版信息

Prostate. 2014 May;74(5):520-7. doi: 10.1002/pros.22771. Epub 2013 Dec 30.

DOI:10.1002/pros.22771
PMID:24375481
Abstract

PURPOSE

To demonstrate the association of neuroendocrine differentiation, as identified by chromogranin A (CgA) staining, with clinical outcomes in newly diagnosed prostatic adenocarcinoma treated with definitive radiotherapy (RT).

MATERIALS/METHODS: Patients with Gleason score ≥7 adenocarcinoma were identified from our outcomes database. RT consisted of external beam, brachytherapy, or external beam with brachytherapy boost. Biopsy specimens were stained for neuroendocrine differentiation with CgA. Results were interpreted by a single pathologist. CgA staining was quantified as 0%, <1%, 1-10%, or >10% of tumor cells. Clinical outcomes were blinded at the time of pathologic evaluation.

RESULTS

CgA staining was performed on 289 patients. 149 patients had Gleason score 7, and 140 were Gleason score 8-10. Median follow-up was 6.5 years. For patients with <1% versus >1% CgA staining, pretreatment characteristics were well-balanced. CgA staining was detected in 90 cases (31%). 58 patients had focal positive (<1%) CgA staining, and 32 cases had >1% of tumor cells CgA positive. Patients with >1% CgA staining had inferior biochemical control, clinical failure, distant metastases (DM), and cause-specific survival (CSS) rates. Ten-year rates of DM were 8% versus 48% for patients with <1% versus >1% CgA positive cells, respectively (P < 0.001). CSS at 10 years was 95% versus 76%, respectively (P < 0.001). Local control was equivalent in the two patient cohorts. Patients with <1% CgA staining had similar outcomes to those patients with 0% staining.

CONCLUSIONS

Neuroendocrine differentiation involving >1% of tumor cells on prostate cancer biopsies is a predictor of DM and CSS in patients treated with primary RT.

摘要

目的

通过免疫组化染色检测嗜铬粒蛋白 A(CgA),探讨其在新诊断前列腺腺癌患者接受根治性放疗(RT)后的临床意义。

材料/方法:从我们的数据库中确定了 Gleason 评分≥7 分的腺癌患者。RT 包括外照射、近距离放疗或外照射联合近距离放疗。用 CgA 对神经内分泌分化进行免疫组化染色。结果由一名病理学家进行解读。CgA 染色结果为肿瘤细胞 0%、<1%、1%-10%和>10%。在病理评估时,临床结果是盲法的。

结果

对 289 例患者进行了 CgA 染色。149 例患者 Gleason 评分 7 分,140 例患者 Gleason 评分 8-10 分。中位随访时间为 6.5 年。在 CgA 染色<1%和>1%的患者中,治疗前的特征是均衡的。90 例(31%)患者检测到 CgA 染色阳性。58 例患者有局灶性弱阳性(<1%)CgA 染色,32 例患者有>1%的肿瘤细胞 CgA 染色阳性。CgA 染色阳性患者的生化控制、临床失败、远处转移(DM)和肿瘤特异性生存(CSS)率均较差。10 年时 DM 发生率分别为 8%和 48%,CgA 染色阳性细胞<1%和>1%的患者(P<0.001)。10 年 CSS 率分别为 95%和 76%,CgA 染色阳性细胞<1%和>1%的患者(P<0.001)。两组患者的局部控制率相当。CgA 染色<1%的患者与 0%染色的患者具有相似的结局。

结论

前列腺癌活检中肿瘤细胞>1%出现神经内分泌分化是接受根治性 RT 治疗的患者发生 DM 和 CSS 的预测因素。

相似文献

1
Chromogranin A staining as a prognostic variable in newly diagnosed Gleason score 7-10 prostate cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy.在接受根治性放疗的新诊断为 Gleason 评分 7-10 前列腺癌中,嗜铬粒蛋白 A 染色作为预后变量。
Prostate. 2014 May;74(5):520-7. doi: 10.1002/pros.22771. Epub 2013 Dec 30.
2
Prognostic significance of neuroendocrine differentiation in patients with Gleason score 8-10 prostate cancer treated with primary radiotherapy.神经内分泌分化对接受原发放疗的 Gleason 评分 8-10 前列腺癌患者的预后意义。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Nov 1;81(3):e119-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.12.064. Epub 2011 May 17.
3
Investigation of the Prognostic Significance of Neuroendocrine Differentiation in Gleason Score 7 to 10 Prostate Adenocarcinoma in Patients With Distant Metastasis After Definitive Radiotherapy.探讨神经内分泌分化在根治性放疗后发生远处转移的 Gleason 评分 7 至 10 级前列腺腺癌患者中的预后意义。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2021 May 18;155(6):879-886. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqaa199.
4
Prognostic importance of Gleason 7 disease among patients treated with external beam radiation therapy for prostate cancer: results of a detailed biopsy core analysis.对于接受外照射治疗前列腺癌的患者,Gleason 7 级疾病的预后重要性:详细的活检核心分析结果。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Apr 1;85(5):1254-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.10.013. Epub 2012 Nov 20.
5
Year of treatment as independent predictor of relapse-free survival in patients with localized prostate cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy in the PSA era.在前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)时代,接受根治性放疗的局限性前列腺癌患者的治疗年份作为无复发生存的独立预测因素。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Nov 1;63(3):795-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.03.029. Epub 2005 May 31.
6
The prognostic role of immunohistochemical chromogranin a expression in prostate cancer patients is significantly modified by androgen-deprivation therapy.免疫组化染色嗜铬粒蛋白 A 在前列腺癌患者中的预后作用受雄激素剥夺治疗的显著影响。
Prostate. 2010 May 15;70(7):718-26. doi: 10.1002/pros.21104.
7
Prognostic significance of neuroendocrine expression in lymph node-positive prostate cancer.神经内分泌表达在淋巴结阳性前列腺癌中的预后意义
Urology. 2006 Jun;67(6):1247-52. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.12.009. Epub 2006 May 12.
8
External beam radiotherapy versus radical prostatectomy for clinical stage T1-2 prostate cancer: therapeutic implications of stratification by pretreatment PSA levels and biopsy Gleason scores.临床分期为T1-2期前列腺癌的体外放射治疗与根治性前列腺切除术:根据治疗前前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平和活检Gleason评分分层的治疗意义
Cancer J Sci Am. 1997 Mar-Apr;3(2):78-87.
9
Distant metastases following permanent interstitial brachytherapy for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer.临床局限性前列腺癌患者行永久性组织间近距离放射治疗后的远处转移。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Feb 1;82(2):e225-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.04.046. Epub 2011 Jun 12.
10
Evaluation of neuroendocrine staining and androgen receptor expression in incidental prostatic adenocarcinoma: prognostic implications.偶发性前列腺腺癌中神经内分泌染色及雄激素受体表达的评估:预后意义
Urology. 2005 Oct;66(4):897-902. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.04.064.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognostic Significance of Chromogranin A Expression in the Initial and Second Biopsies in Metastatic Prostate Cancer.嗜铬粒蛋白A表达在转移性前列腺癌初次活检和二次活检中的预后意义
J Clin Med. 2023 May 9;12(10):3362. doi: 10.3390/jcm12103362.
2
Neuroendocrine differentiation: a risk fellow in colorectal cancer.神经内分泌分化:结直肠癌的一个危险因素。
World J Surg Oncol. 2023 Mar 10;21(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-02952-8.
3
Comprehensive analysis of androgen receptor status in prostate cancer with neuroendocrine differentiation.
前列腺癌神经内分泌分化中雄激素受体状态的综合分析。
Front Oncol. 2022 Aug 9;12:955166. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.955166. eCollection 2022.
4
A bioinformatics-to-clinic sequential approach to analysis of prostate cancer biomarkers using TCGA datasets and clinical samples: a new method for precision oncology?一种利用TCGA数据集和临床样本对前列腺癌生物标志物进行分析的从生物信息学到临床的序贯方法:精准肿瘤学的一种新方法?
Oncotarget. 2017 Aug 24;8(59):99601-99611. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.20448. eCollection 2017 Nov 21.
5
The proliferation marker Ki67, but not neuroendocrine expression, is an independent factor in the prediction of prognosis of primary prostate cancer patients.增殖标志物Ki67而非神经内分泌表达是预测原发性前列腺癌患者预后的独立因素。
Radiol Oncol. 2016 Jul 19;50(3):313-20. doi: 10.1515/raon-2016-0033. eCollection 2016 Sep 1.
6
Neuroendocrine differentiation in prostate cancer: a mechanism of radioresistance and treatment failure.前列腺癌中的神经内分泌分化:一种放射抵抗和治疗失败的机制。
Front Oncol. 2015 Apr 14;5:90. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2015.00090. eCollection 2015.
7
Prostate cancer and neuroendocrine differentiation: more neuronal, less endocrine?前列腺癌与神经内分泌分化:神经元更多,内分泌细胞更少?
Front Oncol. 2015 Mar 3;5:37. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2015.00037. eCollection 2015.
8
Prognostic histopathological and molecular markers on prostate cancer needle-biopsies: a review.前列腺癌穿刺活检的预后组织病理学和分子标志物:综述
Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:341324. doi: 10.1155/2014/341324. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
9
The many faces of neuroendocrine differentiation in prostate cancer progression.前列腺癌进展中神经内分泌分化的多种表现形式。
Front Oncol. 2014 Mar 25;4:60. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2014.00060. eCollection 2014.