Goschke Thomas
Department of Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2014 Jan;23 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):41-57. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1410.
Disadvantageous decision-making and impaired volitional control over actions, thoughts, and emotions are characteristics of a wide range of mental disorders such as addiction, eating disorders, depression, and anxiety disorders and may reflect transdiagnostic core mechanisms and possibly vulnerability factors. Elucidating the underlying neurocognitive mechanisms is a precondition for moving from symptom-based to mechanism-based disorder classifications and ultimately mechanism-targeted interventions. However, despite substantial advances in basic research on decision-making and cognitive control, there are still profound gaps in our current understanding of dysfunctions of these processes in mental disorders. Central unresolved questions are: (i) to which degree such dysfunctions reflect transdiagnostic mechanisms or disorder-specific patterns of impairment; (ii) how phenotypical features of mental disorders relate to dysfunctional control parameter settings and aberrant interactions between large-scale brain systems involved in habit and reward-based learning, performance monitoring, emotion regulation, and cognitive control; (iii) whether cognitive control impairments are consequences or antecedent vulnerability factors of mental disorders; (iv) whether they reflect generalized competence impairments or context-specific performance failures; (v) whether not only impaired but also chronic over-control contributes to mental disorders. In the light of these gaps, needs for future research are: (i) an increased focus on basic cognitive-affective mechanisms underlying decision and control dysfunctions across disorders; (ii) longitudinal-prospective studies systematically incorporating theory-driven behavioural tasks and neuroimaging protocols to assess decision-making and control dysfunctions and aberrant interactions between underlying large-scale brain systems; (iii) use of latent-variable models of cognitive control rather than single tasks; (iv) increased focus on the interplay of implicit and explicit cognitive-affective processes; (v) stronger focus on computational models specifying neurocognitive mechanisms underlying phenotypical expressions of mental disorders.
不利的决策以及对行为、思想和情绪的意志控制受损是多种精神障碍的特征,如成瘾、饮食失调、抑郁症和焦虑症,可能反映了跨诊断的核心机制以及潜在的易感性因素。阐明潜在的神经认知机制是从基于症状的疾病分类转向基于机制的疾病分类并最终实现针对机制的干预措施的前提条件。然而,尽管在决策和认知控制的基础研究方面取得了重大进展,但我们目前对这些过程在精神障碍中的功能障碍的理解仍存在巨大差距。尚未解决的核心问题包括:(i)这些功能障碍在多大程度上反映了跨诊断机制或特定疾病的损伤模式;(ii)精神障碍的表型特征如何与功能失调的控制参数设置以及参与习惯和基于奖励的学习、绩效监测、情绪调节和认知控制的大规模脑系统之间的异常相互作用相关;(iii)认知控制障碍是精神障碍的后果还是先前的易感性因素;(iv)它们是反映了普遍的能力损害还是特定情境下的表现失败;(v)不仅受损而且长期过度控制是否也会导致精神障碍。鉴于这些差距,未来研究的需求包括:(i)更多地关注跨疾病决策和控制功能障碍背后的基本认知 - 情感机制;(ii)纵向前瞻性研究系统地纳入理论驱动的行为任务和神经成像方案,以评估决策和控制功能障碍以及潜在大规模脑系统之间的异常相互作用;(iii)使用认知控制的潜变量模型而非单一任务;(iv)更多地关注内隐和外显认知 - 情感过程的相互作用;(v)更加强调指定精神障碍表型表达背后神经认知机制的计算模型。