• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

研究PubMed在复杂问题解决领域的应用：对工具设计的启示。

Studying PubMed usages in the field for complex problem solving: Implications for tool design.

作者信息

Mirel Barbara, Song Jean, Tonks Jennifer Steiner, Meng Fan, Xuan Weijian, Ameziane Rafiqa

机构信息

School of Education, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 734-332-8969.

Health Sciences Library, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 734-936-1401.

出版信息

J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2013 May 1;64(5):874-92. doi: 10.1002/asi.22796.

DOI:10.1002/asi.22796
PMID:24376375
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3873776/
Abstract

Many recent studies on MEDLINE-based information seeking have shed light on scientists' behaviors and associated tool innovations that may improve efficiency and effectiveness. Few if any studies, however, examine scientists' problem-solving uses of PubMed in actual contexts of work and corresponding needs for better tool support. Addressing this gap, we conducted a field study of novice scientists (14 upper level undergraduate majors in molecular biology) as they engaged in a problem solving activity with PubMed in a laboratory setting. Findings reveal many common stages and patterns of information seeking across users as well as variations, especially variations in cognitive search styles. Based on findings, we suggest tool improvements that both confirm and qualify many results found in other recent studies. Our findings highlight the need to use results from context-rich studies to inform decisions in tool design about to offer improved features to users.

摘要

最近许多基于医学文献数据库（MEDLINE）的信息检索研究，揭示了科学家的行为以及相关工具创新，这些创新可能会提高效率和有效性。然而，几乎没有研究考察科学家在实际工作环境中使用医学期刊数据库（PubMed）解决问题的情况，以及他们对更好工具支持的相应需求。为了填补这一空白，我们对新手科学家（14名分子生物学专业的高年级本科生）在实验室环境中使用PubMed进行问题解决活动的情况进行了实地研究。研究结果揭示了不同用户在信息检索方面的许多共同阶段和模式，以及差异，尤其是认知搜索风格的差异。基于这些发现，我们提出了工具改进建议，这些建议既证实了近期其他研究中的许多结果，又对其进行了补充说明。我们的研究结果强调，需要利用来自丰富情境研究的结果，为工具设计决策提供信息，以便为用户提供改进的功能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8145/3873776/4a3a080de509/nihms401332f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8145/3873776/091fdf8d84cd/nihms401332f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8145/3873776/0538125737d8/nihms401332f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8145/3873776/60dfd246e1a0/nihms401332f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8145/3873776/de4242838fe2/nihms401332f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8145/3873776/4a3a080de509/nihms401332f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8145/3873776/091fdf8d84cd/nihms401332f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8145/3873776/0538125737d8/nihms401332f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8145/3873776/60dfd246e1a0/nihms401332f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8145/3873776/de4242838fe2/nihms401332f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8145/3873776/4a3a080de509/nihms401332f5.jpg

相似文献

1
Studying PubMed usages in the field for complex problem solving: Implications for tool design.研究PubMed在复杂问题解决领域的应用：对工具设计的启示。
J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2013 May 1;64(5):874-92. doi: 10.1002/asi.22796.
2
How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?“护理路径技术”对卒中护理服务整合的影响是如何衡量的，以及有哪些证据支持其在这方面的有效性？
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Mar;6(1):78-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2007.00098.x.
3
Supporting cognition in systems biology analysis: findings on users' processes and design implications.系统生物学分析中的认知支持：关于用户过程的发现及设计启示
J Biomed Discov Collab. 2009 Feb 13;4:2. doi: 10.1186/1747-5333-4-2.
4
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性：一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树：影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
7
Scientists' sense making when hypothesizing about disease mechanisms from expression data and their needs for visualization support.科学家从表达数据中假设疾病机制时的意义建构及其对可视化支持的需求。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2014 Apr 26;15:117. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-15-117.
8
How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?“护理路径技术”对中风护理服务整合的影响是如何衡量的，支持其在这方面有效性的证据力度如何？
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2008;6(15):583-632. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200806150-00001.
9
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性：一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
10
Ontology-Driven Search and Triage: Design of a Web-Based Visual Interface for MEDLINE.本体驱动的搜索与分类：用于医学文献数据库（MEDLINE）的基于网络的可视化界面设计
JMIR Med Inform. 2017 Feb 2;5(1):e4. doi: 10.2196/medinform.6918.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-term evaluation of the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM antibodies in recovered patients: a meta-analysis.恢复期患者 SARS-CoV-2 IgG 和 IgM 抗体血清阳性率的长期评估：一项荟萃分析。
BMC Infect Dis. 2023 Jul 1;23(1):444. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08425-3.
2
Investigating the role of interleukin-1 beta and glutamate in inflammatory bowel disease and epilepsy using discovery browsing.利用探索性浏览研究白细胞介素-1β和谷氨酸在炎症性肠病和癫痫中的作用。
J Biomed Semantics. 2018 Dec 27;9(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s13326-018-0192-y.
3
Informatics Support for Basic Research in Biomedicine.生物医学基础研究的信息学支持
ILAR J. 2017 Jul 1;58(1):80-89. doi: 10.1093/ilar/ilx004.
4
Use of scientific social networking to improve the research strategies of PubMed readers.利用科学社交网络改善PubMed读者的研究策略。
BMC Res Notes. 2016 Feb 18;9:113. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-1920-y.
5
Editorial.社论。
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2014;6(3):109-10.

本文引用的文献

1
HIGH-PRECISION BIOLOGICAL EVENT EXTRACTION: EFFECTS OF SYSTEM AND OF DATA.高精度生物事件提取：系统与数据的影响
Comput Intell. 2011 Nov;27(4):681-701. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8640.2011.00405.x.
2
Discovering and visualizing indirect associations between biomedical concepts.发现和可视化生物医学概念之间的间接关联。
Bioinformatics. 2011 Jul 1;27(13):i111-9. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr214.
3
MeSHy: Mining unanticipated PubMed information using frequencies of occurrences and concurrences of MeSH terms.MeSHy：利用 MeSH 术语的出现频率和并发次数挖掘意想不到的 PubMed 信息。
J Biomed Inform. 2011 Dec;44(6):919-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2011.05.009. Epub 2011 Jun 13.
4
PubMed and beyond: a survey of web tools for searching biomedical literature.PubMed 及其他：生物医学文献检索网络工具调查。
Database (Oxford). 2011 Jan 18;2011:baq036. doi: 10.1093/database/baq036. Print 2011.
5
Cross-domain neurobiology data integration and exploration.跨领域神经生物学数据的整合与探索。
BMC Genomics. 2010 Dec 1;11 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S6. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-S3-S6.
6
Concept-based query expansion for retrieving gene related publications from MEDLINE.基于概念的查询扩展，从 MEDLINE 中检索与基因相关的文献。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2010 Apr 28;11:212. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-212.
7
LigerCat: using "MeSH Clouds" from journal, article, or gene citations to facilitate the identification of relevant biomedical literature.LigerCat：利用来自期刊、文章或基因引用的“医学主题词云”来促进相关生物医学文献的识别。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2009 Nov 14;2009:563-7.
8
Understanding PubMed user search behavior through log analysis.通过日志分析了解PubMed用户的搜索行为。
Database (Oxford). 2009;2009:bap018. doi: 10.1093/database/bap018. Epub 2009 Nov 27.
9
Beyond genes, proteins, and abstracts: Identifying scientific claims from full-text biomedical articles.超越基因、蛋白质和摘要：从全文生物医学文章中识别科学主张。
J Biomed Inform. 2010 Apr;43(2):173-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2009.11.001. Epub 2009 Nov 10.
10
Automatically classifying sentences in full-text biomedical articles into Introduction, Methods, Results and Discussion.自动将全文生物医学文章中的句子分类为引言、方法、结果和讨论。
Bioinformatics. 2009 Dec 1;25(23):3174-80. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp548. Epub 2009 Sep 25.