Cardani Rosanna, Bugiardini Enrico, Renna Laura V, Rossi Giulia, Colombo Graziano, Valaperta Rea, Novelli Giuseppe, Botta Annalisa, Meola Giovanni
Laboratory of Muscle Histopathology and Molecular Biology, IRCCS-Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy.
Department of Neurology, University of Milan, IRCCS-Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy.
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 20;8(12):e83777. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083777. eCollection 2013.
Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) and type 2 (DM2) are progressive multisystemic disorders caused by similar mutations at two different genetic loci. The common key feature of DM pathogenesis is nuclear accumulation of mutant RNA which causes aberrant alternative splicing of specific pre-mRNAs by altering the functions of two RNA binding proteins, MBNL1 and CUGBP1. However, DM1 and DM2 show disease-specific features that make them clearly separate diseases suggesting that other cellular and molecular pathways may be involved. In this study we have analysed the histopathological, and biomolecular features of skeletal muscle biopsies from DM1 and DM2 patients in relation to presenting phenotypes to better define the molecular pathogenesis. Particularly, the expression of CUGBP1 protein has been examined to clarify if this factor may act as modifier of disease-specific manifestations in DM. The results indicate that the splicing and muscle pathological alterations observed are related to the clinical phenotype both in DM1 and in DM2 and that CUGBP1 seems to play a role in classic DM1 but not in DM2. In conclusion, our results indicate that multisystemic disease spectrum of DM pathologies may not be explained only by spliceopathy thus confirming that the molecular pathomechanism of DM is more complex than that actually suggested.
1型强直性肌营养不良(DM1)和2型强直性肌营养不良(DM2)是由两个不同基因位点的相似突变引起的进行性多系统疾病。DM发病机制的共同关键特征是突变RNA在细胞核内积聚,通过改变两种RNA结合蛋白MBNL1和CUGBP1的功能,导致特定前体mRNA异常可变剪接。然而,DM1和DM2表现出疾病特异性特征,使它们成为明显不同的疾病,这表明可能涉及其他细胞和分子途径。在本研究中,我们分析了DM1和DM2患者骨骼肌活检的组织病理学和生物分子特征,并将其与呈现的表型相关联,以更好地定义分子发病机制。特别是,我们检测了CUGBP1蛋白的表达,以阐明该因子是否可能作为DM疾病特异性表现的调节因子。结果表明,在DM1和DM2中观察到的剪接和肌肉病理改变均与临床表型相关,并且CUGBP1似乎在经典DM1中起作用,而在DM2中不起作用。总之,我们的结果表明,DM病理的多系统疾病谱可能不能仅用剪接病来解释,从而证实DM的分子发病机制比实际所提示的更为复杂。