van Remoortel Hans, Camillo Carlos Augusto, Langer Daniel, Hornikx Miek, Demeyer Heleen, Burtin Chris, Decramer Marc, Gosselink Rik, Janssens Wim, Troosters Thierry
Faculty of Kinesiology and Rehabilitation Sciences, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium ; Respiratory Division and Rehabilitation, UZ Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium.
Respiratory Division and Rehabilitation, UZ Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium.
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 20;8(12):e84365. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084365. eCollection 2013.
Accelerometry data are frequently analyzed without considering whether moderate-to-vigorous physical activities (MVPA) were performed in bouts of >10 minutes as defined in most physical activity guidelines. We aimed i) to quantify MVPA by using different commonly-applied physical activity guidelines, ii) to investigate the effect of bouts versus non-bouts analysis, and iii) to propose and validate a MVPA non-bouts cut-point to classify (in-) active subjects.
Healthy subjects (n=110;62±6yrs) and patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) (n=113;62±5yrs) wore an activity monitor for 7 days. Three Metabolic Equivalent of Task (MET) cut-offs and one individual target (50% VO₂ reserve) were used to define MVPA. First, all minutes of MVPA were summed up (NON-BOUTS). Secondly, only minutes performed in bouts of >10 minutes continuous activity were counted (BOUTS). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were used to propose and (cross-) validate new MVPA non-bout cut-points based on the criterion of 30 minutes MVPA per day (BOUTS). Likelihood ratios (sensitivity/[1-specificity]) were used to express the association between the proposed MVPA non-bout target and the MVPA bout target of 30 min*day⁻¹.
MVPA was variable across physical activity guidelines with lowest values for age-specific cut-offs. Selecting a METs cut-point corresponding to 50% VO₂ reserve revealed no differences in MVPA between groups. MVPA's analyzed in BOUTS in healthy subjects were 2 to 4 fold lower than NON-BOUTS analyses and this was even 3 to 12 fold lower in COPD. The MVPA non-bouts cut-point of 80 min*day⁻¹ using a 3 METs MVPA threshold delivered positive likelihood ratios of 5.1[1.5-19.6] (healthy subjects) and 2.3[1.6-3.3] (COPD).
MVPA varies upon the selected physical activity guideline/targets and bouts versus non-bouts analysis. Accelerometry measured MVPA non-bouts target of 80 minday⁻¹, using a 3 METs MVPA threshold, is associated to the commonly-used MVPA bout target of 30 minday⁻¹.
在分析加速度计数据时,常常未考虑是否按照大多数身体活动指南中定义的那样,以超过10分钟的时长进行中等到剧烈的身体活动(MVPA)。我们旨在:i)使用不同的常用身体活动指南来量化MVPA;ii)研究分段与非分段分析的效果;iii)提出并验证一个MVPA非分段切点,以对(不)活跃个体进行分类。
健康受试者(n = 110;62±6岁)和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者(n = 113;62±5岁)佩戴活动监测器7天。使用三个代谢当量任务(MET)切点和一个个体目标(50%的VO₂储备)来定义MVPA。首先,将所有MVPA的分钟数相加(非分段)。其次,仅计算持续活动超过10分钟的时段内的分钟数(分段)。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析,基于每天30分钟MVPA的标准(分段),提出并(交叉)验证新的MVPA非分段切点。似然比(敏感度/[1 - 特异度])用于表示所提出的MVPA非分段目标与30分钟*天⁻¹的MVPA分段目标之间的关联。
MVPA因身体活动指南的不同而有所变化,年龄特异性切点的值最低。选择对应于50% VO₂储备的MET切点显示,两组之间的MVPA没有差异。健康受试者中按分段分析的MVPA比非分段分析低2至4倍,在COPD患者中甚至低3至12倍。使用3 METs的MVPA阈值,80分钟*天⁻¹的MVPA非分段切点得出的阳性似然比为5.1[1.5 - 19.6](健康受试者)和2.3[1.6 - 3.3](COPD)。
MVPA因所选的身体活动指南/目标以及分段与非分段分析的不同而有所变化。使用3 METs的MVPA阈值,加速度计测量的MVPA非分段目标80分钟天⁻¹与常用的30分钟天⁻¹的MVPA分段目标相关。