Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Temple University School of Pharmacy, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2014 Feb;39(1):4-6. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12110. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
In an effort to provide guidance for the use of analgesics for pain management--while at the same time acknowledging the professional, patient and regulatory-legal concerns about the use of strong opioids--the World Health Organization (WHO) in 1986 suggested a conservative stepwise approach. In addition to the use of non-pharmacologic measures, the WHO recommended that pharmacotherapy be initiated using a non-opioid analgesic first and then progress through 'weak' opioids or analgesic combinations to 'strong' opioids if, and only if, needed. This approach gave a rationale, and a justification if necessary, for the use of opioids. This stepwise approach became widely known as the WHO analgesic 'ladder'.
Since the initial WHO guidance, there have been significant changes in the understanding of pain. It is increasingly considered a physiological process that merits and deserves independent treatment. In addition, more analgesic options are available now than in 1986.
Because of the evolving understanding of the physiology of pain and better approaches to its management, we suggest that more modern best practice is an analgesic 'pyramid'.
为了在承认使用强阿片类药物的专业、患者和监管法律问题的同时,为疼痛管理中的镇痛药使用提供指导,世界卫生组织(WHO)于 1986 年提出了一种保守的逐步方法。除了使用非药物措施外,世卫组织还建议,如果有必要,首先使用非阿片类镇痛药进行药物治疗,如果有必要,然后通过“弱”阿片类药物或镇痛药组合进展到“强”阿片类药物。这种方法为使用阿片类药物提供了理由和必要时的理由。这种逐步方法被广泛称为世卫组织镇痛药“阶梯”。
自最初的世卫组织指南以来,人们对疼痛的理解发生了重大变化。它越来越被认为是一种值得和需要独立治疗的生理过程。此外,现在有比 1986 年更多的镇痛选择。
由于对疼痛生理学的理解不断发展,以及对其管理的更好方法,我们建议更现代的最佳实践是镇痛“金字塔”。