From the Stroke and Vascular Research Centre, Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences (A.K., P.J.T., C.J.S.) and Centre for Biostatistics (A.V.), University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Salford Royal Foundation Trust, Salford, United Kingdom; Greater Manchester Comprehensive Stroke Centre, Department of Medical Neurosciences, Salford Royal Foundation Trust, Salford, United Kingdom (A.K., A.M., P.J.T., C.J.S.); and Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Western Infirmary, Glasgow, United Kingdom (J.D., K.R.L.).
Stroke. 2014 Feb;45(2):520-6. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.003433. Epub 2014 Jan 2.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) confers a high risk of recurrent stroke, although detection methods and definitions of paroxysmal AF during screening vary. We therefore undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the frequency of newly detected AF using noninvasive or invasive cardiac monitoring after ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack.
Prospective observational studies or randomized controlled trials of patients with ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, or both, who underwent any cardiac monitoring for a minimum of 12 hours, were included after electronic searches of multiple databases. The primary outcome was detection of any new AF during the monitoring period. We prespecified subgroup analysis of selected (prescreened or cryptogenic) versus unselected patients and according to duration of monitoring.
A total of 32 studies were analyzed. The overall detection rate of any AF was 11.5% (95% confidence interval, 8.9%-14.3%), although the timing, duration, method of monitoring, and reporting of diagnostic criteria used for paroxysmal AF varied. Detection rates were higher in selected (13.4%; 95% confidence interval, 9.0%-18.4%) than in unselected patients (6.2%; 95% confidence interval, 4.4%-8.3%). There was substantial heterogeneity even within specified subgroups.
Detection of AF was highly variable, and the review was limited by small sample sizes and marked heterogeneity. Further studies are required to inform patient selection, optimal timing, methods, and duration of monitoring for detection of AF/paroxysmal AF.
尽管阵发性房颤(AF)的检测方法和定义在筛查期间有所不同,但房颤会增加复发性中风的风险。因此,我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以确定在缺血性卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作后使用非侵入性或侵入性心脏监测检测新发 AF 的频率。
电子检索多个数据库后,纳入了前瞻性观察性研究或随机对照试验,这些研究纳入了接受至少 12 小时任何心脏监测的缺血性卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作或两者的患者。主要结局是监测期间检测到任何新的 AF。我们预先指定了根据选定(预筛选或隐匿性)与未选定患者和监测持续时间进行的亚组分析。
共分析了 32 项研究。任何 AF 的总体检出率为 11.5%(95%置信区间,8.9%-14.3%),尽管阵发性 AF 的监测时间、持续时间、监测方法和诊断标准的报告各不相同。在选定患者(13.4%;95%置信区间,9.0%-18.4%)中,检出率高于未选定患者(6.2%;95%置信区间,4.4%-8.3%)。即使在特定亚组内也存在很大的异质性。
AF 的检测结果差异很大,本综述受到样本量小和明显异质性的限制。需要进一步的研究来为 AF/阵发性 AF 的检测提供患者选择、最佳时机、方法和监测持续时间的信息。