Suppr超能文献

一份用于评估新加坡人能量、脂肪和胆固醇摄入量的半定量食物频率问卷的验证

Validation of a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire for estimation of intakes of energy, fats and cholesterol among Singaporeans.

作者信息

Deurenberg-Yap M, Li T, Tan W L, van Staveren W A, Deurenberg P

机构信息

Department of Nutrition, Level 5, Institute of Health, 3 Second Hospital Avenue, 168937, Singapore.

出版信息

Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2000 Dec;9(4):282-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-6047.2000.00187.x.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the relative validity of a 159-item semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) for use among adult Singaporeans. This FFQ should be able to classify intakes of energy, total fat, saturated fat, polyunsaturated fat, monounsaturated fat and cholesterol into quintiles of intakes for purposes of epidemiological studies. A total of 126 subjects (84 women and 42 men) took part in the study which included an interview using the newly developed FFQ (assess past month's intake) and three 24-h (24 h) recalls (reference method, collected over a period of 1 month). Subjects also collected two 24 h urinary samples for urea from which total nitrogen excretion was assessed to validate protein intake. When compared to the reference method, the FFQ slighty overestimated the intakes of energy, total fat and types of fat as reflected by the difference in means and the ratio of FFQ to 24 h intakes. The overestimation ranged from 1 to 11% of the reference method. Dietary cholesterol was underestimated by 17% by the FFQ. These differences were however, not statistically significant. Pearson's correlation coefficients (95% confidence intervals (CI)) between intakes assessed by FFQ and reference method varied from 0.58 (0.45, 0.69) for total fat to 0.39 (0.23, 0.53) for polyunsaturated fat. Cross-classification into quintiles resulted in correct classification into the same or adjacent quintiles in 70% of subjects, with only one or two subjects being grossly misclassified. Nitrogen (N) intake from the 24 h recalls did not differ significantly from that estimated from the urinary nitrogen excretion. The mean (± SD) difference was 0.0 ± 0.4 g and the Pearson correlation coefficient (95% CI) was 0.55 (0.31, 0.72). It is concluded that the newly developed FFQ is an adequate tool for classifying individuals' intakes into quintiles for epidemiological studies among Singaporean adults.

摘要

本研究旨在评估一份包含159个条目的半定量食物频率问卷(FFQ)在成年新加坡人中使用的相对效度。这份FFQ应能够将能量、总脂肪、饱和脂肪、多不饱和脂肪、单不饱和脂肪和胆固醇的摄入量分为五分位数,以用于流行病学研究。共有126名受试者(84名女性和42名男性)参与了该研究,研究内容包括使用新开发的FFQ进行访谈(评估过去一个月的摄入量)以及三次24小时回顾(参考方法,在1个月的时间段内收集)。受试者还收集了两份24小时尿样用于检测尿素,通过评估总氮排泄量来验证蛋白质摄入量。与参考方法相比,FFQ略微高估了能量、总脂肪和各类脂肪的摄入量,这体现在均值差异以及FFQ与24小时摄入量的比值上。高估幅度为参考方法的1%至11%。FFQ对膳食胆固醇的估计低估了17%。然而,这些差异在统计学上并不显著。FFQ评估的摄入量与参考方法之间的Pearson相关系数(95%置信区间(CI))从总脂肪的0.58(0.45,0.69)到多不饱和脂肪的0.39(0.23,0.53)不等。交叉分类为五分位数后,70%的受试者被正确分类到相同或相邻的五分位数,只有一两名受试者被严重误分类。24小时回顾中的氮(N)摄入量与尿氮排泄量估计值之间没有显著差异。平均(±标准差)差异为0.0±0.4克,Pearson相关系数(95%CI)为0.55(0.31,0.72)。结论是,新开发的FFQ是一种适用于将新加坡成年人群体摄入量分为五分位数以进行流行病学研究的工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验