• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

护理隐性配给感知量表(PIRNCA)的效度验证

Validation of the Perceived Implicit Rationing of Nursing Care (PIRNCA) instrument.

作者信息

Jones Terry L

机构信息

The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.

出版信息

Nurs Forum. 2014 Apr-Jun;49(2):77-87. doi: 10.1111/nuf.12076. Epub 2014 Jan 8.

DOI:10.1111/nuf.12076
PMID:24397252
Abstract

BACKGROUND

An inverse relationship between implicit rationing and quality patient outcomes has been demonstrated in European hospitals, but this relationship has not been explored in the United States.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the psychometric properties of a new measure of implicit rationing, the Perceived Implicit Rationing of Nursing Care (PIRNCA).

METHOD

A cross-sectional survey design with a stratified random sample of 226 medical surgical nurses was used to evaluate the PIRNCA. The internal structure was evaluated using exploratory factor analysis. Pearson correlations were used to assess the associations between implicit rationing and three related constructs: work environment, overall job satisfaction, and quality of care.

RESULTS

A single-factor solution explaining 55% of the total variance and excellent reliability, Cronbach's alpha = 0.97, was supported for the PIRNCA. Moderate inverse relationships with related constructs provided evidence of concurrent validity: work environment (-0.44), overall job satisfaction (-0.48), and quality of care (-0.56). The majority of nurses (97%) reported rationing at least one of the 30 care activities listed; however, mean scores reflected a low frequency ("rarely") of rationing overall.

CONCLUSION

The phenomenon of implicit rationing is experienced by nurses in U.S. hospitals, and the PIRNCA instrument is a valid and reliable measure of this phenomenon.

摘要

背景

欧洲医院已证实隐性资源分配与优质患者结局之间存在负相关关系,但美国尚未对这种关系进行探讨。

目的

评估一种新的隐性资源分配测量方法——护理感知隐性资源分配量表(PIRNCA)的心理测量特性。

方法

采用横断面调查设计,对226名内科外科护士进行分层随机抽样,以评估PIRNCA。使用探索性因素分析评估内部结构。采用Pearson相关性分析评估隐性资源分配与三个相关结构之间的关联:工作环境、总体工作满意度和护理质量。

结果

PIRNCA支持一个解释总方差55%的单因素解决方案,且具有出色的信度,Cronbach's alpha = 0.97。与相关结构的中度负相关关系为同时效度提供了证据:工作环境(-0.44)、总体工作满意度(-0.48)和护理质量(-0.56)。大多数护士(97%)报告在列出的30项护理活动中至少对其中一项进行了资源分配;然而,平均得分反映出总体资源分配频率较低(“很少”)。

结论

美国医院的护士经历了隐性资源分配现象,PIRNCA工具是对这一现象的有效且可靠的测量方法。

相似文献

1
Validation of the Perceived Implicit Rationing of Nursing Care (PIRNCA) instrument.护理隐性配给感知量表(PIRNCA)的效度验证
Nurs Forum. 2014 Apr-Jun;49(2):77-87. doi: 10.1111/nuf.12076. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
2
Psychometric testing of perceived implicit rationing of nursing care (PIRNCA).护理照护感知隐性配给的心理计量学测试(PIRNCA)。
J Adv Nurs. 2020 Jun;76(6):1469-1482. doi: 10.1111/jan.14351. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
3
Polish adaptation and validation of the Perceived Implicit Rationing of Nursing Care (PIRNCA) questionnaire: a cross-sectional validation study.波兰语版《感知护理资源分配不足问卷》(PIRNCA)的适应性和验证:一项横断面验证研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Apr 6;10(4):e031994. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031994.
4
Validation of the Basel Extent of Rationing of Nursing Care instrument.《巴塞尔护理服务配给程度量表》的验证
Nurs Res. 2007 Nov-Dec;56(6):416-24. doi: 10.1097/01.NNR.0000299853.52429.62.
5
CROATIAN ADAPTATION AND VALIDATION OF THE PERCEIVED IMPLICIT RATIONING OF NURSING CARE (PIRNCA) QUESTIONNAIRE: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY.克罗地亚语适应和验证护理感知隐性配给(PIRNCA)问卷:一项横断面研究。
Acta Clin Croat. 2022 Feb;60(3):389-398. doi: 10.20471/acc.2021.60.03.08.
6
Implicit rationing of nursing care reported by nurses from different types of hospitals and hospital units.不同类型医院和医院科室的护士报告的护理服务隐性配给。
J Clin Nurs. 2023 Aug;32(15-16):4962-4971. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16695. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
7
The relationship of staffing and work environment with implicit rationing of nursing care in Swiss nursing homes--A cross-sectional study.瑞士养老院护理人员配置、工作环境与隐性护理资源分配的关系——一项横断面研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2015 Sep;52(9):1463-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.05.005. Epub 2015 May 19.
8
Levels and correlates of implicit rationing of nursing care in Swiss acute care hospitals--a cross sectional study.瑞士急性护理医院护理资源隐性配给的水平和相关性:一项横断面研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2013 Feb;50(2):230-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.09.016. Epub 2012 Oct 22.
9
Patient-centered care, nurse work environment and implicit rationing of nursing care in Swiss acute care hospitals: A cross-sectional multi-center study.以患者为中心的护理、护士工作环境与瑞士急性护理医院护理的隐性配给:一项横断面多中心研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 May;81:98-106. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.11.007. Epub 2017 Nov 24.
10
Are Staffing, Work Environment, Work Stressors, and Rationing of Care Related to Care Workers' Perception of Quality of Care? A Cross-Sectional Study.人员配备、工作环境、工作压力源以及护理资源分配与护理人员对护理质量的认知有关吗?一项横断面研究。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015 Oct 1;16(10):860-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.04.012. Epub 2015 May 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors influencing the self-rationing of nursing care in palliative care settings.姑息治疗环境中影响护理自我配给的因素。
BMC Nurs. 2025 Mar 31;24(1):345. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03029-5.
2
Rationing nursing care and organizational factors in intensive care units.护理资源分配和重症监护病房的组织因素。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 25;19(7):e0306313. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306313. eCollection 2024.
3
Development and validation of the missed intensive nursing care scale.重症护理缺失量表的研制与验证
BMC Nurs. 2024 Mar 7;23(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-01805-3.
4
Missed Nursing Care; Prioritizing the Patient's Needs: An Umbrella Review.漏护;优先考虑患者需求:一项伞状综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jan 16;12(2):224. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12020224.
5
How nursing practice environments limit implicit rationing of care and nurse-assessed adverse events: the role of flow at work.护理实践环境如何限制护理的隐性配给和护士评估的不良事件:工作流程的作用。
BMC Nurs. 2024 Jan 3;23(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01644-8.
6
Rationing of nursing care in Internal Medicine Departments-a cross-sectional study.内科护理资源分配——一项横断面研究。
BMC Nurs. 2023 Dec 4;22(1):455. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01617-x.
7
Commentary: Cultural adaptation of the revised Basel Instrument for Rationing of Care to the Turkish context: a study of validity and reliability.评论:《修订后的巴塞尔医疗资源分配工具》在土耳其背景下的文化适应性:效度与信度研究
J Res Nurs. 2023 Aug;28(5):352-353. doi: 10.1177/17449871231178929. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
8
Rationing in healthcare-a scoping review.医疗保健中的配给制:范围综述。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jun 21;11:1160691. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1160691. eCollection 2023.
9
Inadequate number of staff and other reasons for implicit rationing of nursing care across hospital types and units.各医院类型和科室的护理人员配备不足以及其他因素导致护理服务隐性配给。
Nurs Open. 2023 Aug;10(8):5589-5596. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1802. Epub 2023 May 20.
10
Rationing of nursing care: A concept analysis.护理服务的配给:一项概念分析。
Heliyon. 2023 Apr 28;9(5):e15861. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15861. eCollection 2023 May.