Chen Jun, Bai Lian-Yang, Liu Kun-Feng, Liu Run-Qiang, Zhang Yu-Ping
Pesticide Research Institute, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China.
Int J Mol Sci. 2014 Jan 6;15(1):574-87. doi: 10.3390/ijms15010574.
Atrazine molecular imprinted polymers (MIPs) were comparatively synthesized using identical polymer formulation by far-infrared (FIR) radiation and ultraviolet (UV)-induced polymerization, respectively. Equilibrium binding experiments were carried out with the prepared MIPs; the results showed that MIP(uv) possessed specific binding to atrazine compared with their MIP(FIR) radiation counterparts. Scatchard plot's of both MIPs indicated that the affinities of the binding sites in MIPs are heterogeneous and can be approximated by two dissociation-constants corresponding to the high- and low-affinity binding sites. Moreover, several common pesticides including atrazine, cyromazine, metamitron, simazine, ametryn, terbutryn were tested to determine their specificity, similar imprinting factor (IF) and different selectivity index (SI) for both MIPs. Physical characterization of the polymers revealed that the different polymerization methods led to slight differences in polymer structures and performance by scanning electron microscope (SEM), Fourier transform infrared absorption (FT-IR), and mercury analyzer (MA). Finally, both MIPs were used as selective sorbents for solid phase extraction (SPE) of atrazine from lake water, followed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis. Compared with commercial C18 SPE sorbent (86.4%-94.8%), higher recoveries of atrazine in spiked lake water were obtained in the range of 90.1%-97.1% and 94.4%-101.9%, for both MIPs, respectively.
分别采用远红外(FIR)辐射和紫外(UV)诱导聚合,通过相同的聚合物配方比较合成了阿特拉津分子印迹聚合物(MIPs)。对制备的MIPs进行了平衡结合实验;结果表明,与MIP(FIR)辐射对应物相比,MIP(uv)对阿特拉津具有特异性结合。两种MIPs的Scatchard图表明,MIPs中结合位点的亲和力是异质的,可以用对应于高亲和力和低亲和力结合位点的两个解离常数来近似。此外,对包括阿特拉津、环丙氨嗪、甲嘧磺隆、西玛津、莠灭净、特丁净在内的几种常见农药进行了测试,以确定它们对两种MIPs的特异性、相似的印迹因子(IF)和不同的选择性指数(SI)。聚合物的物理表征表明,通过扫描电子显微镜(SEM)、傅里叶变换红外吸收(FT-IR)和汞分析仪(MA),不同的聚合方法导致聚合物结构和性能略有差异。最后,两种MIPs都用作固相萃取(SPE)从湖水中提取阿特拉津的选择性吸附剂,随后进行高效液相色谱(HPLC)分析。与商用C18 SPE吸附剂(86.4%-94.8%)相比,两种MIPs在加标湖水中阿特拉津的回收率分别在90.1%-97.1%和94.4%-101.9%范围内,更高。