Suppr超能文献

颅内动脉瘤患者评估中的功能容量量表:可靠性和有效性。

Functional capacity scale in assessment of patients with intracranial aneurysms: reliability and validity.

机构信息

Questions or comments about this article may be directed to Robert Ślusarz, RN MA CNS PhD, at

出版信息

J Neurosci Nurs. 2014 Feb;46(1):46-54. doi: 10.1097/JNN.0000000000000028.

Abstract

The aim of the study was to investigate the use of the Functional Capacity Scale (FCS) to measure functional outcome of patients who had undergone surgical removal of an intracranial aneurysm in the early postoperative period. Reliability and validity of the tool were tested as well as its utility in nursing practice. The study included 120 patients, operated on for intracranial aneurysm. Phase I included 23 patients. Reliability of FCS and the amount of time used for the assessment were tested using observation and direct measurement methods. Phase II included 97 patients, and the tool was administered along with standard outcome assessment tools (Barthel Index, Functional Index "Repty," Glasgow Outcome Score, and Rankin Scale) to determine concurrent validity. Kendall's coefficients of concordance (W) between particular care markers of FCS ranged from 0.910 to 1.000. Mean amount of time used for assessment was 90 seconds. Differences between time used for measurements by individual examiners were insignificant (p > .05). Correlation of FCS with the following scales was statistically significant: Functional Index "Repty" (p < .001), Glasgow Outcome Score (p < .01), Rankin Scale (p < .01), and Barthel Index (p < .001). The FCS appears to be a reliable, valid, and practical assessment tool for neuroscience nurses to use with patients who have undergone surgical removal of an intracranial aneurysm.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨功能容量量表(FCS)在测量颅内动脉瘤手术后早期患者功能结果方面的应用。该工具的可靠性和有效性以及在护理实践中的实用性也得到了测试。该研究纳入了 120 名接受颅内动脉瘤手术的患者。第一阶段包括 23 名患者。使用观察和直接测量方法测试了 FCS 的可靠性和评估所需的时间。第二阶段包括 97 名患者,除了标准的结局评估工具(巴氏指数、功能指数“Repty”、格拉斯哥结局评分和 Rankin 量表)外,还使用该工具评估工具以确定其同时效度。FCS 特定护理标志物之间的肯德尔协调系数(W)范围为 0.910 至 1.000。评估所需的平均时间为 90 秒。个别检查者测量时间的差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。FCS 与以下量表的相关性具有统计学意义:功能指数“Repty”(p<0.001)、格拉斯哥结局评分(p<0.01)、Rankin 量表(p<0.01)和巴氏指数(p<0.001)。FCS 似乎是神经科护士用于评估颅内动脉瘤手术后患者的一种可靠、有效且实用的评估工具。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验