King Joseph T, Tsevat Joel, Roberts Mark S
Section of Neurosurgery, Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven 06516, USA.
J Neurosurg. 2006 Apr;104(4):525-30. doi: 10.3171/jns.2006.104.4.525.
Cerebral aneurysms can adversely affect the functional status of patients who harbor them through rupture, mass effect, or treatment sequela. The authors compared the Physical Performance Test (PPT)--an observer-administered test requiring the completion of seven tasks--with three functional status measures based on patient self-reports: the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS), the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), and the modified Barthel Index (mBI).
Data were collected from 144 patients with aneurysms who had been recruited from a neurosurgery clinic. The patients completed the PPT and were assigned GOS scores, mRS scores, and mBIs based on their responses during a structured interview. The validity of the PPT was assessed by examining the relationship between the results of the PPT and the values assigned to each patient by using the GOS, mRS, and mBI by applying rank-order methods; the reliability of the PTT was assessed using the Cronbach alpha coefficient. The mean age of the patients was 52.8 years; 72% were women and 54% had survived a subarachnoid hemorrhage. The mean +/- standard deviation PPT score was 24.0 +/- 3.7. The PPT generated a broad distribution of scores, whereas GOS and mRS scores and mBIs displayed significant ceiling effects, that is, 75% of the patients were clustered in the highest categories. The PPT scores were validated by their strong association with GOS scores, mRS scores, and mBIs (for all, p < 0.001), and the reliability of the PPT was demonstrated by a Cronbach alpha value of 0.77.
The PPT provides an objective measure of functional status in patients with cerebral aneurysms. The results suggest that the PPT may differentiate among patients better than the GOS, mRS, or mBL The PPT is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring functional status in patients with cerebral aneurysms.
脑动脉瘤可通过破裂、占位效应或治疗后遗症对患有脑动脉瘤的患者的功能状态产生不利影响。作者将物理性能测试(PPT)(一种由观察者实施、要求完成七项任务的测试)与基于患者自我报告的三项功能状态测量指标进行了比较:格拉斯哥预后量表(GOS)、改良Rankin量表(mRS)和改良Barthel指数(mBI)。
从一家神经外科诊所招募的144例动脉瘤患者中收集数据。患者完成PPT,并根据他们在结构化访谈中的回答获得GOS评分、mRS评分和mBI。通过使用排序方法检查PPT结果与使用GOS、mRS和mBI为每位患者指定的值之间的关系,评估PPT的有效性;使用Cronbachα系数评估PTT的可靠性。患者的平均年龄为52.8岁;72%为女性,54%曾经历过蛛网膜下腔出血。PPT评分的平均值±标准差为24.0±3.7。PPT产生了广泛的分数分布,而GOS和mRS评分以及mBI显示出明显的天花板效应,即75%的患者集中在最高类别。PPT评分通过与GOS评分、mRS评分和mBI的强关联得到验证(所有p<0.001),PPT的可靠性通过Cronbachα值0.77得到证明。
PPT为脑动脉瘤患者的功能状态提供了一种客观测量方法。结果表明,PPT在区分患者方面可能比GOS、mRS或mBL更好。PPT是测量脑动脉瘤患者功能状态的有效且可靠的工具。