Suppr超能文献

生物制剂改善病情抗风湿药的疗效:一项系统文献回顾,为 2013 年更新的 EULAR 类风湿关节炎管理建议提供信息。

Efficacy of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: a systematic literature review informing the 2013 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis.

机构信息

Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Chapel Allerton Hospital, and NIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, , Leeds, UK.

出版信息

Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Mar;73(3):516-28. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204577. Epub 2014 Jan 7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To update the evidence for the efficacy of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARD) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) to inform the European League Against Rheumatism(EULAR) Task Force treatment recommendations.

METHODS

Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched for articles published between January 2009 and February 2013 on infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab, certolizumab-pegol, golimumab, anakinra, abatacept, rituximab, tocilizumab and biosimilar DMARDs (bsDMARDs) in phase 3 development. Abstracts from 2011 to 2012 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and 2011-2013 EULAR conferences were obtained.

RESULTS

Fifty-one full papers, and 57 abstracts were identified. The randomised controlled trials (RCT) confirmed the efficacy of bDMARD+conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) versus csDMARDs alone (level 1B evidence). There was some additional evidence for the use of bDMARD monotherapy, however bDMARD and MTX combination therapy for all bDMARD classes was more efficacious (1B). Clinical and radiographic responses were high with treat-to-target strategies. Earlier improvement in signs and symptoms were seen with more intensive initial treatment strategies, but outcomes were similar upon addition of bDMARDs in patients with insufficient response to MTX. In general, radiographic progression was lower with bDMARD use, mainly due to initial treatment effects. Although patients may achieve bDMARD- and drug-free remission, maintenance of clinical responses was higher with bDMARD continuation (1B), but bDMARD dose reduction could be applied (1B). There was still no RCT data for bDMARD switching.

CONCLUSIONS

The systematic literature review confirms efficacy of biological DMARDs in RA. It addresses different treatment strategies with the potential for reduction in therapy, particularly with early disease control, and highlights emerging therapies.

摘要

目的

更新生物改善病情抗风湿药物(bDMARD)治疗类风湿关节炎(RA)患者的疗效证据,为欧洲抗风湿病联盟(EULAR)工作组的治疗建议提供参考。

方法

检索了 2009 年 1 月至 2013 年 2 月间发表的关于英夫利昔单抗、依那西普、阿达木单抗、培塞利珠单抗、戈利木单抗、阿那白滞素、阿巴西普、利妥昔单抗、托珠单抗和生物类似 DMARD(bsDMARD)的 III 期研究的 Medline、Embase 和 Cochrane 数据库的文章。并获得了 2011 年至 2012 年美国风湿病学会(ACR)和 2011 年至 2013 年 EULAR 会议的摘要。

结果

共确定了 51 篇全文和 57 篇摘要。随机对照试验(RCT)证实了 bDMARD+常规合成 DMARD(csDMARD)与 csDMARD 单独治疗相比的疗效(1B 级证据)。bDMARD 单药治疗也有一些额外的证据,但所有 bDMARD 类别的 bDMARD 和 MTX 联合治疗更有效(1B)。采用靶向治疗策略可获得良好的临床和放射学应答。采用更强化的初始治疗策略,可更早改善症状和体征,但在 MTX 应答不足的患者中添加 bDMARD 后,结果相似。总体而言,使用 bDMARD 可降低放射学进展,主要是由于初始治疗效果。虽然患者可能实现 bDMARD 和药物无缓解,但继续使用 bDMARD 可维持更高的临床应答(1B),但可减少 bDMARD 剂量(1B)。目前仍没有关于 bDMARD 转换的 RCT 数据。

结论

系统文献综述证实了生物 DMARD 在 RA 中的疗效。它探讨了不同的治疗策略,具有降低治疗风险的潜力,特别是在早期疾病控制方面,并强调了新兴的治疗方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验