• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

我们能否通过充满情感的刺激来保护自己免受任务干扰?

Can we shield ourselves from task disturbance by emotion-laden stimulation?

作者信息

Augst Susanne, Kleinsorge Thomas, Kunde Wilfried

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Julius Maximilians University Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany,

出版信息

Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2014 Sep;14(3):1009-25. doi: 10.3758/s13415-013-0243-x.

DOI:10.3758/s13415-013-0243-x
PMID:24399683
Abstract

Emotion-laden stimuli can disturb information processing in an unrelated cognitive task. We investigated the possibilities and limitations for shielding from such disturbance. Participants performed a simple categorization task while being simultaneously exposed to negative, neutral, and positive pictures. Performance dropped with negative pictures, relative to positive and neutral stimuli. Unlike Stroop or Simon interference effects, this negativity-based disturbance did not reduce as a function of previous experience of disturbance (Exp. 1) or of announcement of such disturbance on a trial-by-trial basis (Exps. 2 and 3). We found hints of a reduction of negativity-based disturbance, however, when negative stimulation occurred with high list-wide probability (Exp. 4). These observations suggest that the control of negativity-based task disturbance might be possible in a sustained manner, but that it is severely limited when operating in a transient, moment-to-moment manner.

摘要

充满情感的刺激会干扰无关认知任务中的信息处理。我们研究了屏蔽此类干扰的可能性和局限性。参与者在同时接触负面、中性和正面图片时执行一项简单的分类任务。相对于正面和中性刺激,负面图片会导致表现下降。与斯特鲁普或西蒙干扰效应不同,这种基于负面性的干扰不会随着先前的干扰经历(实验1)或逐次试验中对此类干扰的预告(实验2和3)而减少。然而,当负面刺激以较高的列表范围内的概率出现时(实验4),我们发现了基于负面性的干扰有所减少的迹象。这些观察结果表明,持续控制基于负面性的任务干扰可能是可行的,但以瞬态、逐时刻的方式操作时,这种控制会受到严重限制。

相似文献

1
Can we shield ourselves from task disturbance by emotion-laden stimulation?我们能否通过充满情感的刺激来保护自己免受任务干扰?
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2014 Sep;14(3):1009-25. doi: 10.3758/s13415-013-0243-x.
2
Adaptation to (non)valent task disturbance.适应(非)价值任务干扰。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2012 Dec;12(4):644-60. doi: 10.3758/s13415-012-0116-8.
3
The locus of the emotional Stroop effect: a study with the PRP paradigm.情绪性斯特鲁普效应的轨迹:一项采用PRP范式的研究
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 Sep;151:8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.05.011. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
4
Emotion-dependent modulation of interference processes: an fMRI study.情绪依赖的干扰过程调制:一项功能磁共振成像研究。
Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars). 2008;68(2):193-203. doi: 10.55782/ane-2008-1688.
5
HIV-positive females show blunted neurophysiological responses in an emotion-attention dual task paradigm.HIV 阳性女性在情绪 - 注意力双重任务范式中表现出神经生理反应迟钝。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2014 Jun;125(6):1164-73. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.09.048. Epub 2013 Dec 1.
6
Emotionally negative pictures increase attention to a subsequent auditory stimulus.情绪负面的图片会增加对随后听觉刺激的注意力。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2012 Jan;83(1):36-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.09.020. Epub 2011 Oct 19.
7
Explicit semantic stimulus categorization interferes with implicit emotion processing.明确的语义刺激分类会干扰内隐情绪加工。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014 Nov;9(11):1738-45. doi: 10.1093/scan/nst171. Epub 2013 Nov 5.
8
Positive emotion modulates cognitive control: an event-related potentials study.积极情绪调节认知控制:一项事件相关电位研究。
Scand J Psychol. 2013 Apr;54(2):82-8. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12031. Epub 2013 Feb 8.
9
Positive emotion speeds up conflict processing: ERP responses in an auditory Simon task.积极情绪能加速冲突处理:听觉 Simon 任务中的 ERP 反应。
Biol Psychol. 2011 Apr;87(1):122-7. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.02.018. Epub 2011 Mar 4.
10
Modulation of emotion by cognition and cognition by emotion.认知对情绪的调节以及情绪对认知的调节。
Neuroimage. 2007 Mar;35(1):430-40. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.11.048. Epub 2007 Jan 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Expectations don't protect us from emotional distractions.期望并不能使我们免受情绪干扰。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 May 23. doi: 10.3758/s13414-025-03085-8.
2
The Emotional Stroop Effect Is Modulated by the Biological Salience and Motivational Intensity Inherent in Stimuli.情绪斯特鲁普效应受刺激中固有的生物学显著性和动机强度的调节。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 21;10:3023. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03023. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
The locus of the emotional Stroop effect: a study with the PRP paradigm.情绪性斯特鲁普效应的轨迹:一项采用PRP范式的研究
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 Sep;151:8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.05.011. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
2
Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.在个体内设计中使用置信区间。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1994 Dec;1(4):476-90. doi: 10.3758/BF03210951.
3
Domain-specific control mechanisms for emotional and nonemotional conflict processing.特定领域的控制机制对情绪和非情绪冲突处理的影响。
Cognition. 2013 Feb;126(2):234-45. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.10.004. Epub 2012 Oct 31.
4
Adaptation to (non)valent task disturbance.适应(非)价值任务干扰。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2012 Dec;12(4):644-60. doi: 10.3758/s13415-012-0116-8.
5
Your unconscious knows your name.你的潜意识知道你的名字。
PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e32402. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032402. Epub 2012 Mar 5.
6
Neural mechanisms mediating contingent capture of attention by affective stimuli.神经机制介导情感刺激引起的注意瞬脱。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2012 May;24(5):1113-26. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00211. Epub 2012 Feb 23.
7
Executive control attenuates emotional effects-For high reappraisers only?执行控制减弱情绪影响——仅对高再评价者而言?
Emotion. 2012 Oct;12(5):970-9. doi: 10.1037/a0026890. Epub 2012 Jan 16.
8
The variable nature of cognitive control: a dual mechanisms framework.认知控制的多变性:双机制框架。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2012 Feb;16(2):106-13. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.12.010. Epub 2012 Jan 12.
9
Emotional distraction unbalances visual processing.情绪分散会打破视觉处理的平衡。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Apr;19(2):184-9. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0210-x.
10
Affective privilege: asymmetric interference by emotional distracters.情感特权:情绪干扰物的非对称干扰。
Front Psychol. 2011 Sep 16;2:232. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00232. eCollection 2011.