• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

适应(非)价值任务干扰。

Adaptation to (non)valent task disturbance.

机构信息

Department of Psychology III, Julius Maximilians University Würzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.

出版信息

Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2012 Dec;12(4):644-60. doi: 10.3758/s13415-012-0116-8.

DOI:10.3758/s13415-012-0116-8
PMID:22936069
Abstract

The cognitive system adapts to disturbances caused by task-irrelevant information. For example, interference due to irrelevant spatial stimulation (e.g., the spatial Simon effect) typically diminishes right after a spatially incongruent event. These adaptation effects reflect processes that help to overcome the impact of task-irrelevant information. Interference with (or interruption of) task processing can also result from valent (i.e., positive or negative) stimuli, such as in the "affective Simon" task. In the present study, we tested whether the resolution of valence-based task disturbances generalizes to the resolution of other cognitive (spatial) types of interference, and vice versa. Experiments 1 and 2 explored the interplay of adaptation effects triggered by spatial and affective interference. Incongruent spatial information modified the spatial Simon effect but not affective interference effects, whereas incongruent affective information modified affective interference effects to some extent, but not spatial Simon effects. In Experiment 3, we investigated the interplay of adaptation effects triggered by spatial interference and by the interruption of task processing from valent information that did not overlap with the main task ("emotional Stroop" effect). Again we observed domain-specific adaptation for the spatial Simon effect but found no evidence for cross-domain modulations. We assume that the processes used to resolve task disturbance from irrelevant affective and spatial information operate in largely independent manners.

摘要

认知系统会适应由与任务无关的信息引起的干扰。例如,由于无关的空间刺激(例如,空间 Simon 效应)而产生的干扰通常在空间不一致的事件发生后立即减弱。这些适应效应反映了有助于克服与任务无关的信息的影响的过程。对(或中断)任务处理的干扰也可能是由有价值的(即正或负)刺激引起的,例如在“情感 Simon”任务中。在本研究中,我们测试了基于价值的任务干扰的解决是否会泛化到其他认知(空间)类型干扰的解决,反之亦然。实验 1 和 2 探讨了由空间和情感干扰引发的适应效应的相互作用。不一致的空间信息修改了空间 Simon 效应,但不影响情感干扰效应,而不一致的情感信息在一定程度上修改了情感干扰效应,但不影响空间 Simon 效应。在实验 3 中,我们研究了由空间干扰和由与主要任务不重叠的有价值信息(“情绪 Stroop”效应)中断任务处理引发的适应效应的相互作用。我们再次观察到空间 Simon 效应的特定领域适应,但没有发现跨领域调节的证据。我们假设用于从无关的情感和空间信息中解决任务干扰的过程以很大程度上独立的方式运作。

相似文献

1
Adaptation to (non)valent task disturbance.适应(非)价值任务干扰。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2012 Dec;12(4):644-60. doi: 10.3758/s13415-012-0116-8.
2
The locus of the emotional Stroop effect: a study with the PRP paradigm.情绪性斯特鲁普效应的轨迹:一项采用PRP范式的研究
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 Sep;151:8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.05.011. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
3
Interference effects in the Stroop and Simon paradigms.斯特鲁普范式和西蒙范式中的干扰效应。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1993 Aug;19(4):830-44. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.19.4.830.
4
The costs of emotional attention: affective processing inhibits subsequent lexico-semantic analysis.情感注意力的代价:情感加工会抑制后续的词汇语义分析。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Dec;19(12):1932-49. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.12.1932.
5
The influence of dimensional overlap on location-related priming in the Simon task.维度重叠对西蒙任务中位置相关启动效应的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(12):2329-47. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.778303. Epub 2013 Apr 13.
6
Can we shield ourselves from task disturbance by emotion-laden stimulation?我们能否通过充满情感的刺激来保护自己免受任务干扰?
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2014 Sep;14(3):1009-25. doi: 10.3758/s13415-013-0243-x.
7
Early and late temporo-spatial effects of contextual interference during perception of facial affect.面部表情感知过程中情境干扰的早期和晚期时空效应
Int J Psychophysiol. 2009 Oct;74(1):1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2009.05.010. Epub 2009 May 24.
8
Control processes through the suppression of the automatic response activation triggered by task-irrelevant information in the Simon-type tasks.在西蒙式任务中,通过抑制由任务无关信息触发的自动反应激活来进行控制过程。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2015 Nov;162:51-61. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.10.001. Epub 2015 Oct 31.
9
The accessory Simon effect within and across visual dimensions.视觉维度内和跨视觉维度的附属西蒙效应。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 May;72(5):981-993. doi: 10.1177/1747021818782769. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
10
Task-defined associations are mode specific for selection of relevant dimension but mode independent for selection of location mapping.任务定义的关联对于相关维度的选择是模式特定的,但对于位置映射的选择是模式独立的。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Feb;62(2):370-91. doi: 10.1080/17470210801954942. Epub 2008 Apr 30.

引用本文的文献

1
I am Once Again Asking for Your Attention: A Replication of Feature-Based Attention Modulations of Binding Effects with Picture Stimuli.我再次请求您的关注:基于特征的注意调制对图片刺激结合效应的复制。
J Cogn. 2025 Feb 5;8(1):22. doi: 10.5334/joc.432. eCollection 2025.
2
Cognitive control mechanisms in language processing: are there both within- and across-task conflict adaptation effects?语言加工中的认知控制机制:是否存在任务内和任务间冲突适应效应?
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 Mar;76(3):649-671. doi: 10.1177/17470218221111789. Epub 2022 Sep 18.
3
Limitations of cognitive control on emotional distraction - Congruency in the Color Stroop task does not modulate the Emotional Stroop effect.

本文引用的文献

1
Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.在个体内设计中使用置信区间。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1994 Dec;1(4):476-90. doi: 10.3758/BF03210951.
2
Affective privilege: asymmetric interference by emotional distracters.情感特权:情绪干扰物的非对称干扰。
Front Psychol. 2011 Sep 16;2:232. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00232. eCollection 2011.
3
Negative emotion impairs conflict-driven executive control.消极情绪会损害冲突驱动的执行控制。
认知控制对情绪分心的局限性 - 在颜色斯特鲁普任务中,一致并不调节情绪斯特鲁普效应。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2022 Feb;22(1):21-41. doi: 10.3758/s13415-021-00935-4. Epub 2021 Nov 4.
4
Is there evidence for cross-domain congruency sequence effect? A replication of Kan . (2013).是否存在跨领域一致性序列效应的证据?对Kan(2013年)的一项重复研究。
R Soc Open Sci. 2021 Mar 3;8(3):191353. doi: 10.1098/rsos.191353.
5
Contributions of expected sensory and affective action effects to action selection and performance: Evidence from forced- and free-choice tasks.预期的感觉和情感动作效应在动作选择和表现中的作用:来自强制选择和自由选择任务的证据。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Jun;24(3):821-827. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1139-x.
6
Post-conflict slowing after incongruent stimuli: from general to conflict-specific.冲突后不一致刺激下的反应减慢:从一般情况到特定冲突情况
Psychol Res. 2017 May;81(3):611-628. doi: 10.1007/s00426-016-0767-0. Epub 2016 Mar 28.
7
Creatures of habit (and control): a multi-level learning perspective on the modulation of congruency effects.习惯(与控制)的产物:关于一致性效应调节的多层次学习视角
Front Psychol. 2014 Nov 6;5:1247. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01247. eCollection 2014.
8
What determines the specificity of conflict adaptation? A review, critical analysis, and proposed synthesis.冲突适应的特异性由什么决定?综述、批判性分析与综合建议。
Front Psychol. 2014 Oct 8;5:1134. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01134. eCollection 2014.
9
The heterogeneous world of congruency sequence effects: an update.一致性序列效应的多相世界:更新。
Front Psychol. 2014 Sep 9;5:1001. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01001. eCollection 2014.
10
Can we shield ourselves from task disturbance by emotion-laden stimulation?我们能否通过充满情感的刺激来保护自己免受任务干扰?
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2014 Sep;14(3):1009-25. doi: 10.3758/s13415-013-0243-x.
Front Psychol. 2011 Aug 11;2:192. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00192. eCollection 2011.
4
Post-conflict slowing: cognitive adaptation after conflict processing.冲突后减速:冲突处理后的认知适应
Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Feb;18(1):76-82. doi: 10.3758/s13423-010-0016-2.
5
In the mood for adaptation: how affect regulates conflict-driven control.适应情绪:影响如何调节冲突驱动的控制。
Psychol Sci. 2010 Nov;21(11):1629-34. doi: 10.1177/0956797610385951. Epub 2010 Oct 13.
6
Analyzing the generality of conflict adaptation effects.分析冲突适应效应的普遍性。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Feb;36(1):147-61. doi: 10.1037/a0017598.
7
Reward counteracts conflict adaptation. Evidence for a role of affect in executive control.奖励可抵消冲突适应。情感在执行控制中的作用的证据。
Psychol Sci. 2009 Dec;20(12):1473-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02470.x. Epub 2009 Nov 9.
8
Generalized signaling for control: evidence from postconflict and posterror performance adjustments.用于控制的广义信号:来自冲突后和错误后表现调整的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Aug;35(4):1161-77. doi: 10.1037/a0014491.
9
Anticipation selectively enhances interference exerted by pictures of negative valence.预期会选择性地增强由负价图片施加的干扰。
Exp Psychol. 2009;56(4):228-35. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.56.4.228.
10
Neural systems supporting the control of affective and cognitive conflicts.支持情感和认知冲突控制的神经系统。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Sep;21(9):1842-55. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21129.