• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

神经机制介导情感刺激引起的注意瞬脱。

Neural mechanisms mediating contingent capture of attention by affective stimuli.

机构信息

Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.

出版信息

J Cogn Neurosci. 2012 May;24(5):1113-26. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00211. Epub 2012 Feb 23.

DOI:10.1162/jocn_a_00211
PMID:22360642
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3654100/
Abstract

Attention is attracted exogenously by physically salient stimuli, but this effect can be dampened by endogenous attention settings, a phenomenon called "contingent capture." Emotionally salient stimuli are also thought to exert a strong exogenous influence on attention, especially in anxious individuals, but whether and how top-down attention can ameliorate bottom-up capture by affective stimuli is currently unknown. Here, we paired a novel spatial cueing task with fMRI to investigate contingent capture as a function of the affective salience of bottom-up cues (face stimuli) and individual differences in trait anxiety. In the absence of top-down cues, exogenous stimuli validly cueing targets facilitated attention in low-anxious participants, regardless of affective salience. However, although high-anxious participants exhibited similar facilitation following neutral exogenous cues, this facilitation was completely absent following affectively negative exogenous cues. Critically, these effects were contingent on endogenous attentional settings, such that explicit top-down cues presented before the appearance of exogenous stimuli removed anxious individuals' sensitivity to affectively salient stimuli. fMRI analyses revealed a network of brain regions underlying this variability in affective contingent capture across individuals, including the fusiform face area (FFA), posterior ventrolateral frontal cortex, and SMA. Importantly, activation in the posterior ventrolateral frontal cortex and the SMA fully mediated the effects observed in FFA, demonstrating a critical role for these frontal regions in mediating attentional orienting and interference resolution processes when engaged by affectively salient stimuli.

摘要

注意会被物理上显著的刺激物吸引,但是这种效应可以被内源性注意设置所抑制,这种现象被称为“条件性捕获”。情绪显著的刺激物也被认为会对注意力产生强烈的外源性影响,特别是在焦虑个体中,但是自上而下的注意力是否以及如何改善情绪刺激的自下而上捕获目前尚不清楚。在这里,我们将一项新的空间提示任务与 fMRI 结合起来,研究了作为自下而上提示(面部刺激)的情绪显著性和特质焦虑个体差异的函数的条件性捕获。在没有自上而下提示的情况下,有效地提示目标的外源性刺激促进了低焦虑参与者的注意力,而与情绪显著性无关。然而,尽管高焦虑参与者在中性外源性提示后表现出类似的促进作用,但在外源性负性情绪刺激后,这种促进作用完全消失。至关重要的是,这些效应取决于内源性注意力设置,例如,在出现外源性刺激之前呈现的明确的自上而下的提示消除了焦虑个体对情绪显著刺激的敏感性。fMRI 分析揭示了个体之间情感条件性捕获变化的大脑区域网络,包括梭状回面孔区(FFA)、后外侧额下皮质和 SMA。重要的是,后外侧额下皮质和 SMA 的激活完全介导了 FFA 中观察到的效应,表明这些额区在处理情绪显著刺激时,在介导注意力定向和干扰解决过程中起着关键作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad03/3654100/196b0f3b174c/nihms463591f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad03/3654100/44261299e122/nihms463591f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad03/3654100/cd2e08da5afd/nihms463591f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad03/3654100/1049001ef42b/nihms463591f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad03/3654100/196b0f3b174c/nihms463591f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad03/3654100/44261299e122/nihms463591f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad03/3654100/cd2e08da5afd/nihms463591f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad03/3654100/1049001ef42b/nihms463591f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad03/3654100/196b0f3b174c/nihms463591f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Neural mechanisms mediating contingent capture of attention by affective stimuli.神经机制介导情感刺激引起的注意瞬脱。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2012 May;24(5):1113-26. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00211. Epub 2012 Feb 23.
2
The role of top-down spatial attention in contingent attentional capture.自上而下的空间注意在偶然注意捕获中的作用。
Psychophysiology. 2016 May;53(5):650-62. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12615. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
3
The Role of Top-Down Focused Spatial Attention in Preattentive Salience Coding and Salience-based Attentional Capture.自上而下的聚焦空间注意在预注意显著性编码和基于显著性的注意捕获中的作用。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2016 Aug;28(8):1152-65. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00964. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
4
Characterizing the effects of feature salience and top-down attention in the early visual system.表征早期视觉系统中特征显著性和自上而下注意力的影响。
J Neurophysiol. 2017 Jul 1;118(1):564-573. doi: 10.1152/jn.00924.2016. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
5
Distinct roles of the intraparietal sulcus and temporoparietal junction in attentional capture from distractor features: An individual differences approach.顶内沟和颞顶联合区在由干扰物特征引起的注意捕获中的不同作用:一种个体差异研究方法。
Neuropsychologia. 2015 Jul;74:50-62. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.02.029. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
6
Interactions between voluntary and stimulus-driven spatial attention mechanisms across sensory modalities.跨感觉模式的自愿和刺激驱动的空间注意机制之间的相互作用。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Dec;21(12):2384-97. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.21178.
7
Search for a threatening target triggers limbic guidance of spatial attention.寻找威胁性目标会触发空间注意力的边缘系统引导。
J Neurosci. 2009 Aug 26;29(34):10563-72. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1170-09.2009.
8
ERP and fMRI correlates of endogenous and exogenous focusing of visual-spatial attention.视觉空间注意内源性和外源性聚焦的事件相关电位(ERP)及功能磁共振成像(fMRI)关联
Eur J Neurosci. 2006 May;23(9):2511-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.04756.x.
9
Top-down and bottom-up attentional guidance: investigating the role of the dorsal and ventral parietal cortices.自上而下和自下而上的注意力引导:研究背侧和腹侧顶叶皮层的作用。
Exp Brain Res. 2010 Oct;206(2):197-208. doi: 10.1007/s00221-010-2326-z. Epub 2010 Jun 23.
10
Neural bases of the interactions between spatial attention and conscious perception.空间注意与意识知觉相互作用的神经基础。
Cereb Cortex. 2013 Jun;23(6):1269-79. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs087. Epub 2012 Apr 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence reveals the effects of trait anxiety on contingent attentional capture.电生理和行为学证据揭示了特质焦虑对偶然注意捕获的影响。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2017 Oct;17(5):973-983. doi: 10.3758/s13415-017-0526-8.
2
The neural basis of intergroup threat effect on social attention.群体间威胁效应对社会注意力的神经基础。
Sci Rep. 2017 Jan 25;7:41062. doi: 10.1038/srep41062.
3
Decomposing Self-Control: Individual Differences in Goal Pursuit Despite Interfering Aversion, Temptation, and Distraction.剖析自我控制:尽管存在干扰性厌恶、诱惑和分心因素,但在目标追求上的个体差异。
Front Psychol. 2016 Apr 18;7:382. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00382. eCollection 2016.
4
Emotional task management: neural correlates of switching between affective and non-affective task-sets.情绪任务管理:在情感和非情感任务集之间切换的神经关联。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2015 Aug;10(8):1045-53. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsu153. Epub 2014 Dec 30.
5
Human brain structure predicts individual differences in preconscious evaluation of facial dominance and trustworthiness.人类大脑结构可预测对面部支配性和可信度的前意识评估中的个体差异。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2015 May;10(5):690-9. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsu103. Epub 2014 Sep 4.
6
Does the amygdala response correlate with the personality trait 'harm avoidance' while evaluating emotional stimuli explicitly?杏仁核反应是否与人格特质“回避危险”相关,在明确评估情绪刺激时?
Behav Brain Funct. 2014 May 7;10:18. doi: 10.1186/1744-9081-10-18.
7
Can we shield ourselves from task disturbance by emotion-laden stimulation?我们能否通过充满情感的刺激来保护自己免受任务干扰?
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2014 Sep;14(3):1009-25. doi: 10.3758/s13415-013-0243-x.
8
Application of a cognitive neuroscience perspective of cognitive control to late-life anxiety.认知神经科学视角下认知控制在老年期焦虑中的应用。
J Anxiety Disord. 2013 Aug;27(6):559-66. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2013.03.006. Epub 2013 Mar 22.
9
Trait anxiety modulates fronto-limbic processing of emotional interference in borderline personality disorder.特质焦虑调节边缘型人格障碍中情绪干扰的额眶部-边缘处理。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Mar 1;7:54. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00054. eCollection 2013.

本文引用的文献

1
Attentional capture by emotional stimuli is preserved in patients with amygdala lesions.情绪刺激引起的注意捕获在杏仁核损伤的患者中得到保留。
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Oct;49(12):3314-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.08.004. Epub 2011 Aug 11.
2
The neural underpinnings of how reward associations can both guide and misguide attention.奖励关联既能引导又能误导注意力的神经基础。
J Neurosci. 2011 Jun 29;31(26):9752-9. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0732-11.2011.
3
Value-driven attentional capture.价值驱动的注意捕获。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jun 21;108(25):10367-71. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1104047108. Epub 2011 Jun 6.
4
Cognitive control and right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex: reflexive reorienting, motor inhibition, and action updating.认知控制与右侧额下回腹外侧部:反射性重新定向、运动抑制和动作更新。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2011 Apr;1224(1):40-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.05958.x.
5
Signals of threat do not capture, but prioritize, attention: a conditioning approach.威胁信号并非捕获,而是优先处理注意力:一种条件作用方法。
Emotion. 2011 Feb;11(1):81-9. doi: 10.1037/a0021286.
6
Emotional processing in anterior cingulate and medial prefrontal cortex.前扣带皮层和内侧前额叶皮质的情绪处理。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Feb;15(2):85-93. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.11.004. Epub 2010 Dec 16.
7
Emotional dilution of the Stroop effect: a new tool for assessing attention under emotion.情绪对斯特鲁普效应的稀释:一种评估情绪下注意力的新工具。
Emotion. 2010 Dec;10(6):944-8. doi: 10.1037/a0020172.
8
From reactive to proactive and selective control: developing a richer model for stopping inappropriate responses.从反应性到主动性和选择性控制:开发一种更丰富的模型来停止不适当的反应。
Biol Psychiatry. 2011 Jun 15;69(12):e55-68. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.07.024. Epub 2010 Oct 8.
9
Attention bias modification treatment: a meta-analysis toward the establishment of novel treatment for anxiety.注意偏向修正治疗:建立新型焦虑症治疗方法的元分析。
Biol Psychiatry. 2010 Dec 1;68(11):982-90. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.07.021.
10
Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection.视觉选择的自上而下和自下而上控制。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Oct;135(2):77-99. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.02.006. Epub 2010 May 26.