Sá Ivy Luizi Rodrigues de, Sallum Maria Anice Mureb
Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2013 Dec;108(8):1014-20. doi: 10.1590/0074-0276130474.
In several countries, surveillance of insect vectors is accomplished with automatic traps. This study addressed the performance of Mosquito Magnet® Independence (MMI) in comparison with those of CDC with CO2 and lactic acid (CDC-A) and CDC light trap (CDC-LT). The collection sites were in a rural region located in a fragment of secondary tropical Atlantic rainforest, southeastern Brazil. Limatus durhami and Limatus flavisetosus were the dominant species in the MMI, whereas Ochlerotatus scapularis was most abundant in CDC-A. Culex ribeirensis and Culex sacchettae were dominant species in the CDC-LT. Comparisons among traps were based on diversity indices. Results from the diversity analyses showed that the MMI captured a higher abundance of mosquitoes and that the species richness estimated with it was higher than with CDC-LT. Contrasting, difference between MMI and CDC-A was not statistically significant. Consequently, the latter trap seems to be both an alternative for the MMI and complementary to it for ecological studies and entomological surveillance.
在一些国家，昆虫媒介监测是通过自动诱捕器完成的。本研究比较了独立型灭蚊磁器（MMI）与配备二氧化碳和乳酸的疾控中心诱捕器（CDC-A）以及疾控中心灯光诱捕器（CDC-LT）的性能。采集地点位于巴西东南部一片次生热带大西洋雨林片段中的一个农村地区。杜氏伊蚊和黄跗伊蚊是MMI中的优势种，而肩背伊蚊在CDC-A中最为常见。里贝朗库蚊和萨氏库蚊是CDC-LT中的优势种。诱捕器之间的比较基于多样性指数。多样性分析结果表明，MMI捕获的蚊子数量更多，用它估计的物种丰富度高于CDC-LT。相比之下，MMI和CDC-A之间的差异无统计学意义。因此，后一种诱捕器似乎既是MMI的替代品，也是其在生态研究和昆虫学监测方面的补充。
