Suppr超能文献

仅在早晨服用的聚乙二醇与分剂量肠道准备相比,效果不劣,但住院患者对此的偏好较低。

Morning-only polyethylene glycol is noninferior but less preferred by hospitalized patients as compared with split-dose bowel preparation.

作者信息

Kotwal Vikram S, Attar Bashar M, Carballo Mauricio D, Lee Salina S, Kaura Tarun, Go Benjamin, Zhang Huiyuan, Trick William E

机构信息

*Division of Gastroenterology †Department of Medicine ‡Collaborative Research Unit, Department of Medicine, John H Stroger Jr Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, IL.

出版信息

J Clin Gastroenterol. 2014 May-Jun;48(5):414-8. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31829f30e9.

Abstract

GOALS

To compare the efficacy and tolerability of morning-only polyethylene glycol (PEG) with split-dose preparation in hospitalized patients scheduled for colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND

Morning-only colonoscopy preparation may improve efficiency by allowing patient preparation and colonoscopy to be performed on the same day. There are limited data comparing morning-only with split-dose preparation, and more studies are needed before morning-only preparation can be routinely recommended.

STUDY

A single-center, prospective, endoscopist-blinded study was conducted, in which hospitalized patients scheduled to undergo diagnostic colonoscopy were randomly assigned to receive 4 L of PEG either on the morning of colonoscopy or as a split-dose (evening-morning). The primary endpoint was efficacy of bowel preparation measured by the Ottawa scale. Secondary endpoints were patient compliance and tolerance.

RESULTS

A total of 120 hospitalized patients scheduled for diagnostic colonoscopy were randomized. The mean total Ottawa score was slightly superior for the morning-only arm, and the upper bound of 95% confidence interval (CI) for difference between arms was less than our prespecified noninferiority margin of 1.5 (difference=-0.23; 95% CI, -1.72 to 1.25). The percentage of patients with good bowel preparation was similar for all colonic segments. There was a trend toward more side effects among patients in the morning-only compared with the split-dose arm (71% vs. 54%; P=0.08). Compared with morning-only preparation, more patients in the split-dose arm were willing to undergo similar preparation for future colonoscopies (71% vs. 89%; P=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Morning-only PEG is not inferior to split-dose preparation regarding bowel cleansing efficacy for colonoscopy in hospitalized patients. However, split-dose preparation was preferred by patients because of less side effects.

摘要

目标

比较仅在早晨服用聚乙二醇(PEG)与分剂量制剂在计划进行结肠镜检查的住院患者中的疗效和耐受性。

背景

仅在早晨进行结肠镜检查准备可通过允许在同一天进行患者准备和结肠镜检查来提高效率。比较仅早晨服用与分剂量制剂的相关数据有限,在常规推荐仅早晨服用的准备方法之前还需要更多研究。

研究

进行了一项单中心、前瞻性、内镜医师盲法研究,其中计划接受诊断性结肠镜检查的住院患者被随机分配在结肠镜检查当天早晨或分剂量(晚上 - 早晨)服用4升PEG。主要终点是通过渥太华量表测量的肠道准备效果。次要终点是患者的依从性和耐受性。

结果

共有120名计划进行诊断性结肠镜检查的住院患者被随机分组。仅早晨服用组的平均渥太华总分略高,两组之间差异的95%置信区间(CI)上限小于我们预先设定的非劣效性界限1.5(差异 = -0.23;95%CI,-1.72至1.25)。所有结肠段肠道准备良好的患者百分比相似。与分剂量组相比,仅早晨服用组的患者出现更多副作用的趋势(71%对54%;P = 0.08)。与仅早晨服用的准备方法相比,分剂量组中更多患者愿意在未来结肠镜检查时接受类似的准备(71%对89%;P = 0.02)。

结论

在住院患者结肠镜检查的肠道清洁效果方面,仅早晨服用PEG并不劣于分剂量制剂。然而,由于副作用较少,患者更喜欢分剂量制剂。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验