• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于解释水平理论对抵制性发现的一种解释。

An explanation of resisted discoveries based on construal-level theory.

作者信息

Fang Hui

机构信息

School of Electronic Science and Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry for Life Science, Nanjing University, No. 163, Xianlin Avenue, Qixia District, Nanjing, China,

出版信息

Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Feb;21(1):41-50. doi: 10.1007/s11948-013-9512-x. Epub 2014 Jan 10.

DOI:10.1007/s11948-013-9512-x
PMID:24407889
Abstract

New discoveries and theories are crucial for the development of science, but they are often initially resisted by the scientific community. This paper analyses resistance to scientific discoveries that supplement previous research results or conclusions with new phenomena, such as long chains in macromolecules, Alfvén waves, parity nonconservation in weak interactions and quasicrystals. Construal-level theory is used to explain that the probability of new discoveries may be underestimated because of psychological distance. Thus, the insufficiently examined scope of an accepted theory may lead to overstating the suitable scope and underestimating the probability of its undiscovered counter-examples. Therefore, psychological activity can result in people instinctively resisting new discoveries. Direct evidence can help people judge the validity of a hypothesis with rational thinking. The effects of authorities and textbooks on the resistance to discoveries are also discussed. From the results of our analysis, suggestions are provided to reduce resistance to real discoveries, which will benefit the development of science.

摘要

新发现和新理论对科学发展至关重要,但它们最初往往会遭到科学界的抵制。本文分析了科学界对那些用新现象补充先前研究结果或结论的科学发现的抵制,比如大分子中的长链、阿尔文波、弱相互作用中的宇称不守恒以及准晶体。构念水平理论被用来解释,由于心理距离,新发现的可能性可能会被低估。因此,一个被接受理论的检验范围不足可能会导致高估其适用范围,并低估其未被发现的反例的可能性。所以,心理活动会导致人们本能地抵制新发现。直接证据有助于人们通过理性思考判断假设的有效性。本文还讨论了权威和教科书对抵制发现的影响。根据我们的分析结果,提出了减少对真实发现的抵制的建议,这将有益于科学的发展。

相似文献

1
An explanation of resisted discoveries based on construal-level theory.基于解释水平理论对抵制性发现的一种解释。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Feb;21(1):41-50. doi: 10.1007/s11948-013-9512-x. Epub 2014 Jan 10.
2
Proxy decision making and dementia: Using Construal Level Theory to analyse the thoughts of decision makers.代理决策与痴呆:运用构念水平理论分析决策者的想法。
J Adv Nurs. 2018 Jul;74(7):1712-1722. doi: 10.1111/jan.13563. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
3
Construing the Essence: The Effects of Construal Level on Genetic Attributions for Individual and Social Group Differences.构建本质:构建水平对个体和社会群体差异的遗传归因的影响。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2018 Sep;44(9):1395-1407. doi: 10.1177/0146167218768799. Epub 2018 May 2.
4
[Historical context of parasitological studies in tropical area, malaria as an example].[热带地区寄生虫学研究的历史背景,以疟疾为例]
Wiad Parazytol. 2007;53(3):179-87.
5
In a year, memory will benefit from learning, tomorrow it won't: distance and construal level effects on the basis of metamemory judgments.一年内,学习将有助于记忆;明天则不然:距离和构想水平对元记忆判断的基础的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Sep;39(5):1621-7. doi: 10.1037/a0032381. Epub 2013 Apr 15.
6
Theory and data interactions of the scientific mind: evidence from the molecular and the cognitive laboratory.科学思维中的理论与数据交互:来自分子实验室和认知实验室的证据
Can J Exp Psychol. 2004 Jun;58(2):86-95. doi: 10.1037/h0085799.
7
Neurological evidence for the role of construal level in future-directed thought.解释水平在前瞻性思维中作用的神经学证据。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2017 Jun 1;12(6):937-947. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsx022.
8
Thinking Concretely Increases the Perceived Likelihood of Risks: The Effect of Construal Level on Risk Estimation.具体思考会增加对风险的感知可能性:解释水平对风险估计的影响。
Risk Anal. 2016 Mar;36(3):623-37. doi: 10.1111/risa.12445. Epub 2015 Jun 26.
9
Before theory comes theorizing or how to make social science more interesting.在理论形成之前的理论化过程,或者如何让社会科学更有趣。
Br J Sociol. 2016 Mar;67(1):5-22. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12184. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
10
Kuhn's Structure of Scientific Revolutions between sociology and epistemology.库恩的《科学革命的结构》在社会学与认识论之间
Stud Hist Philos Sci. 2014 Jun;46:78-84. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2014.02.006.

引用本文的文献

1
Large-scale analysis of delayed recognition using sleeping beauty and the prince.使用睡美人与王子对延迟识别进行大规模分析。
Appl Netw Sci. 2021;6(1):48. doi: 10.1007/s41109-021-00389-0. Epub 2021 Jun 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Construal-level theory of psychological distance.心理距离的构建层次理论。
Psychol Rev. 2010 Apr;117(2):440-63. doi: 10.1037/a0018963.
2
Preparing for novel versus familiar events: shifts in global and local processing.为新异事件与熟悉事件做准备:全局与局部加工的转变
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2009 Aug;138(3):383-99. doi: 10.1037/a0015748.
3
Natural quasicrystals.天然准晶体
Science. 2009 Jun 5;324(5932):1306-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1170827.
4
The effect of construal level on subjective probability estimates.解释水平对主观概率估计的影响。
Psychol Sci. 2009 Jan;20(1):52-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02250.x. Epub 2008 Dec 5.
5
Temporal construal effects on abstract and concrete thinking: consequences for insight and creative cognition.时间建构对抽象思维和具体思维的影响:对顿悟和创造性认知的影响
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Aug;87(2):177-89. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.177.
6
Resistance by scientists to scientific discovery.科学家对科学发现的抵制。
Science. 1961 Sep 1;134(3479):596-602. doi: 10.1126/science.134.3479.596.