Naya Masanao, Murthy Venkatesh L, Taqueti Viviany R, Foster Courtney R, Klein Josh, Garber Mariya, Dorbala Sharmila, Hainer Jon, Blankstein Ron, Resnic Frederick, Di Carli Marcelo F
NonInvasive Cardiovascular Imaging Program, Departments of Medicine (Cardiology) and Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
J Nucl Med. 2014 Feb;55(2):248-55. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.113.121442. Epub 2014 Jan 9.
Myocardial perfusion imaging has limited sensitivity for the detection of high-risk coronary artery disease (CAD). We tested the hypothesis that a normal coronary flow reserve (CFR) would be helpful for excluding the presence of high-risk CAD on angiography.
We studied 290 consecutive patients undergoing (82)Rb PET within 180 d of invasive coronary angiography. High-risk CAD on angiography was defined as 2-vessel disease (≥ 70% stenosis), including the proximal left anterior descending artery; 3-vessel disease; or left main CAD (≥ 50% stenosis). Patients with prior Q wave myocardial infarction, elevated troponin levels between studies, prior coronary artery bypass grafting, a left ventricular ejection fraction of less than 40%, or severe valvular heart disease were excluded.
Fifty-five patients (19%) had high-risk CAD on angiography. As expected, the trade-off between the sensitivity and the specificity of the CFR for identifying high-risk CAD varied substantially depending on the cutoff selected. In multivariable analysis, a binary CFR of less than or equal to 1.93 provided incremental diagnostic information for the identification of high-risk CAD beyond the model with the Duke clinical risk score (>25%), percentage of left ventricular ischemia (>10%), transient ischemic dilation index (>1.07), and change in the left ventricular ejection fraction during stress (<2) (P = 0.0009). In patients with normal or slightly to moderately abnormal results on perfusion scans (<10% of left ventricular mass) during stress (n = 136), a preserved CFR (>1.93) excluded high-risk CAD with a high sensitivity (86%) and a high negative predictive value (97%).
A normal CFR has a high negative predictive value for excluding high-risk CAD on angiography. Although an abnormal CFR increases the probability of significant obstructive CAD, it cannot reliably distinguish significant epicardial stenosis from nonobstructive, diffuse atherosclerosis or microvascular dysfunction.
心肌灌注成像对于检测高危冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的敏感性有限。我们检验了这样一个假设,即正常的冠状动脉血流储备(CFR)有助于在血管造影时排除高危CAD的存在。
我们研究了290例在有创冠状动脉造影180天内接受(82)Rb PET检查的连续患者。血管造影显示的高危CAD定义为双支血管病变(狭窄≥70%),包括左前降支近端;三支血管病变;或左主干CAD(狭窄≥50%)。排除有既往Q波心肌梗死、两次检查之间肌钙蛋白水平升高、既往冠状动脉旁路移植术、左心室射血分数低于40%或严重瓣膜性心脏病的患者。
55例患者(19%)血管造影显示有高危CAD。正如预期的那样,CFR识别高危CAD的敏感性和特异性之间的权衡很大程度上取决于所选的临界值。在多变量分析中,二元CFR小于或等于1.93为识别高危CAD提供了增量诊断信息,超出了包含杜克临床风险评分(>25%)、左心室缺血百分比(>10%)、短暂性缺血扩张指数(>1.07)和负荷期间左心室射血分数变化(<2)的模型(P = 0.0009)。在负荷期间灌注扫描结果正常或轻度至中度异常(左心室质量<10%)的患者(n = 136)中,保留的CFR(>1.93)以高敏感性(86%)和高阴性预测值(97%)排除了高危CAD。
正常的CFR对于在血管造影时排除高危CAD具有高阴性预测值。虽然异常的CFR增加了显著阻塞性CAD的可能性,但它不能可靠地区分显著的心外膜狭窄与非阻塞性、弥漫性动脉粥样硬化或微血管功能障碍。