Anil Thomas George, Colorectal Surgery, St Mark's Hospital, London HA1 3UJ, United Kingdom.
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Dec 28;19(48):9139-45. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i48.9139.
Neurostimulation remains the mainstay of treatment for patients with faecal incontinence who fails to respond to available conservative measures. Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) is the main form of neurostimulation that is in use today. Posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS)--both the percutaneous and the transcutaneous routes--remains a relatively new entry in neurostimulation. Though in its infancy, PTNS holds promise to be an effective, patient friendly, safe and cheap treatment. However, presently PTNS only appears to have a minor role with SNS having the limelight in treating patients with faecal incontinence. This seems to have arisen as the strong, uniform and evidence based data on SNS remains to have been unchallenged yet by the weak, disjointed and unsupported evidence for both percutaneous and transcutaneous PTNS. The use of PTNS is slowly gaining acceptance. However, several questions remain unanswered in the delivery of PTNS. These have raised dilemmas which as long as they remain unsolved can considerably weaken the argument that PTNS could offer a viable alternative to SNS. This paper reviews available information on PTNS and focuses on these dilemmas in the light of existing evidence.
神经刺激仍然是治疗对现有保守措施无反应的粪便失禁患者的主要方法。骶神经刺激(SNS)是目前使用的主要神经刺激形式。经皮和经皮途径的胫骨后神经刺激(PTNS)仍然是神经刺激的相对较新的方法。虽然还处于起步阶段,但 PTNS 有望成为一种有效、患者友好、安全且廉价的治疗方法。然而,目前 PTNS 似乎仅在 SNS 治疗粪便失禁患者方面发挥次要作用,因为 SNS 的强有力、一致且基于证据的数据尚未受到经皮和经皮 PTNS 的薄弱、不连贯和无支持证据的挑战。PTNS 的使用正在慢慢被接受。然而,在提供 PTNS 时,仍有几个问题未得到解答。这些问题引起了困境,只要这些问题没有得到解决,就会大大削弱 PTNS 可以作为 SNS 的可行替代方案的观点。本文综述了关于 PTNS 的现有信息,并根据现有证据重点讨论了这些困境。