奈达铂联合三维适形放疗治疗局部晚期食管癌。
Nedaplatin concurrent with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for treatment of locally advanced esophageal carcinoma.
机构信息
Ze-Tian Shen, Xin-Hu Wu, Bing Li, Jun-Shu Shen, Zhen Wang, Jing Li, Xi-Xu Zhu, Department of Radiation Oncology, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210002, Jiangsu Province, China.
出版信息
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Dec 28;19(48):9447-52. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i48.9447.
AIM
To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of nedaplatin (NDP) concurrent with radiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced esophageal carcinoma.
METHODS
Sixty-eight patients with locally advanced esophageal carcinoma were randomized into either a NDP group (n = 34) or a cisplatin (DDP) group (n = 34). The NDP group received NDP 80-100 mg/m² iv on day 1 + leucovorin (CF) 100 mg/m² iv on days 1-5 + 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 500 mg/m² iv on days 1-5. The DDP group received DDP 30 mg/m² iv on days 1-3 + CF 100 mg/m² on days 1-5 + 5-FU 500 mg/m² iv on days 1-5. The treatment was repeated every 4 wk in both groups. Concurrent radiotherapy [60-66 Gy/(30-33 f)/(6-7 wk)] was given during chemotherapy.
RESULTS
There was no significant difference in the short-term response rate between the NDP group and DDP group (90.9% vs 81.3%, P = 0.528). Although the 1- and 2-year survival rates were higher in the NDP group than in the DDP group (75.8% vs 68.8%, 57.6% vs 50.0%), the difference in the overall survival rate was not statistically significant between the two groups (P = 0.540). The incidences of nausea, vomiting and nephrotoxicity were significantly lower in the NDP group than in the DDP group (17.6% vs 50.0%, P = 0.031; 11.8% vs 47.1%, P = 0.016; 8.8% vs 38.2%, P = 0.039). There was no significant difference in the incidence of myelosuppression, radiation-induced esophagitis or radiation-induced pneumonia between the two groups.
CONCLUSION
NDP-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy is effective and well-tolerated in patients with locally advanced esophageal carcinoma. NDP-based regimen has comparable efficacy to DDP-based regimen but is associated with lower incidences of gastrointestinal and renal toxicity.
目的
评价奈达铂(NDP)联合放疗治疗局部晚期食管癌的疗效和毒性。
方法
68 例局部晚期食管癌患者随机分为 NDP 组(n = 34)和顺铂(DDP)组(n = 34)。NDP 组给予奈达铂 80-100 mg/m² 静脉滴注第 1 天+亚叶酸钙(CF)100 mg/m² 静脉滴注第 1-5 天+5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)500 mg/m² 静脉滴注第 1-5 天。DDP 组给予顺铂 30 mg/m² 静脉滴注第 1-3 天+CF 100 mg/m² 静脉滴注第 1-5 天+5-FU 500 mg/m² 静脉滴注第 1-5 天。两组均每 4 周重复治疗。化疗期间给予同步放疗[60-66 Gy/(30-33 次)/(6-7 周)]。
结果
NDP 组和 DDP 组近期疗效差异无统计学意义(90.9%比 81.3%,P = 0.528)。NDP 组 1 年和 2 年生存率均高于 DDP 组(75.8%比 68.8%,57.6%比 50.0%),但两组总生存率差异无统计学意义(P = 0.540)。NDP 组恶心、呕吐和肾毒性发生率明显低于 DDP 组(17.6%比 50.0%,P = 0.031;11.8%比 47.1%,P = 0.016;8.8%比 38.2%,P = 0.039)。两组骨髓抑制、放射性食管炎和放射性肺炎发生率差异无统计学意义。
结论
奈达铂联合放化疗治疗局部晚期食管癌有效且耐受性良好。奈达铂方案与顺铂方案疗效相当,但胃肠道和肾毒性发生率较低。