Suppr超能文献

复杂事件相关电位(P300和CNV)及多次睡眠潜伏期试验在发作性睡病-猝倒症日间过度嗜睡评估中的应用

Complex event-related potentials (P300 and CNV) and MSLT in the assessment of excessive daytime sleepiness in narcolepsy-cataplexy.

作者信息

Aguirre M, Broughton R J

出版信息

Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1987 Oct;67(4):298-316. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(87)90116-7.

Abstract

The P300 and contingent negative variation (CNV) evoked potential (EP) paradigms were performed by 12 untreated narcoleptics and controls immediately prior to each nap of the Multiple Sleep Latency Test (MSLT) in order to assess whether they might hold promise as rapid quantitative techniques to assess excessive daytime sleepiness. The Stanford Sleepiness Scale (SSS) was also completed across test days and immediately before and after both the evoked potential recordings and MSLT naps. MSLT findings confirmed shorter sleep latencies and frequent SOREMPs in narcoleptics and a strong mid-afternoon increase in sleepiness based upon pressure for NREM sleep in both groups. On SSS narcoleptics were sleepier and they showed greater increase in sleepiness induced by the EP tests and greater sleepiness reduction by the MSLT naps. In the P300 paradigm, narcoleptics showed smaller component P3 amplitudes and larger P1 amplitudes. In the CNV paradigm, N1 latencies were greater in narcoleptics to both S1 and S2 and the post-CNV negative component was larger: but no significant differences were seen for the main CNV measures of negativity amplitude in the first or second halves of the response. The P300 paradigm but not the CNV, therefore, appeared to be a sensitive EP measure of sleepiness. Finally, EP components in both the P300 and CNV paradigms showed time-of-day (circadian) differences between narcoleptics and controls.

摘要

在多次睡眠潜伏期试验(MSLT)的每次小睡之前,12名未经治疗的发作性睡病患者和对照组进行了P300和关联性负变(CNV)诱发电位(EP)范式试验,以评估它们是否有望作为评估日间过度嗜睡的快速定量技术。在整个测试期间以及诱发电位记录和MSLT小睡之前和之后,还完成了斯坦福嗜睡量表(SSS)。MSLT结果证实,发作性睡病患者的睡眠潜伏期较短,频繁出现睡眠始发快速眼动期(SOREMP),并且两组基于非快速眼动睡眠压力,午后嗜睡明显增加。在SSS上,发作性睡病患者更嗜睡,他们在EP测试中表现出更大的嗜睡增加,在MSLT小睡后嗜睡减少更多。在P300范式中,发作性睡病患者的P3成分波幅较小,P1波幅较大。在CNV范式中,发作性睡病患者对S1和S2的N1潜伏期更长,CNV后的负性成分更大:但在反应的前半部分或后半部分,CNV负性波幅的主要测量指标没有显著差异。因此,P300范式而非CNV范式似乎是嗜睡的敏感EP测量方法。最后,P300和CNV范式中的EP成分在发作性睡病患者和对照组之间显示出昼夜(昼夜节律)差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验