Broughton R, Valley V, Aguirre M, Roberts J, Suwalski W, Dunham W
Sleep. 1986;9(1 Pt 2):205-15. doi: 10.1093/sleep/9.1.205.
The main disabling symptom of narcolepsy-cataplexy is shown to be the unrelenting excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) based upon controlled studies of socioeconomic effects and the poor response to treatment. Objective performance deficits mainly involve tests of ability to sustain performance on repetitive boring tasks and are reversible by improved alertness. Physiologically, EDS is seen to represent relatively slow waxing and waning of alertness rather than punctate microsleeps. Evidence is provided for complex cerebral evoked potentials (P300, contingent negative variation) being very sensitive EDS measures comparable to the multiple sleep latency test (MSLT). EDS appears to have qualitatively somewhat different forms mainly reflecting pressure for REM sleep (REM sleepiness) or pressure for NREM sleep (NREM sleepiness), which have different effects on cerebral evoked potentials as well as subjective and objective (MSLT) differences. It is argued that in pathophysiological terms narcolepsy may best be considered a disease of state boundary control.
基于对社会经济影响的对照研究以及治疗反应不佳,发作性睡病 - 猝倒症的主要致残症状表现为持续的日间过度嗜睡(EDS)。客观的行为表现缺陷主要涉及在重复性枯燥任务中维持表现的能力测试,并且可通过提高警觉性而逆转。从生理角度来看,EDS表现为警觉性相对缓慢的起伏,而非短暂的微睡眠。有证据表明,复杂的脑诱发电位(P300、关联性负变)是与多次睡眠潜伏期测试(MSLT)相当的非常敏感的EDS测量指标。EDS似乎在性质上有一些不同的形式,主要反映快速眼动睡眠压力(快速眼动睡眠嗜睡)或非快速眼动睡眠压力(非快速眼动睡眠嗜睡),这对脑诱发电位以及主观和客观(MSLT)差异有不同影响。有人认为,从病理生理学角度来看,发作性睡病最好被视为一种状态边界控制的疾病。