Wallraven Christian
Department of Brain and Cognitive Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea,
Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Aug;21(4):995-1002. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0577-y.
The idea that faces are represented within a structured face space (Valentine Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 43: 161-204, 1991) has gained considerable experimental support, from both physiological and perceptual studies. Recent work has also shown that faces can even be recognized haptically-that is, from touch alone. Although some evidence favors congruent processing strategies in the visual and haptic processing of faces, the question of how similar the two modalities are in terms of face processing remains open. Here, this question was addressed by asking whether there is evidence for a haptic face space, and if so, how it compares to visual face space. For this, a physical face space was created, consisting of six laser-scanned individual faces, their morphed average, 50%-morphs between two individual faces, as well as 50%-morphs of the individual faces with the average, resulting in a set of 19 faces. Participants then rated either the visual or haptic pairwise similarity of the tangible 3-D face shapes. Multidimensional scaling analyses showed that both modalities extracted perceptual spaces that conformed to critical predictions of the face space framework, hence providing support for similar processing of complex face shapes in haptics and vision. Despite the overall similarities, however, systematic differences also emerged between the visual and haptic data. These differences are discussed in the context of face processing and complex-shape processing in vision and haptics.
面孔在结构化的面孔空间中得到表征这一观点(瓦伦丁,《实验心理学季刊》43: 161 - 204,1991年)已获得大量来自生理学和知觉研究的实验支持。近期研究还表明,面孔甚至可以通过触觉来识别——也就是说,仅通过触摸来识别。尽管有一些证据支持在面孔的视觉和触觉加工中采用一致的加工策略,但在面孔加工方面这两种模态有多相似的问题仍然没有答案。在此,通过询问是否有证据支持存在触觉面孔空间,以及如果有的话,它与视觉面孔空间如何比较,来探讨这个问题。为此,创建了一个物理面孔空间,它由六个激光扫描的个体面孔、它们的变形平均值、两个个体面孔之间的50%变形,以及个体面孔与平均值之间的50%变形组成,从而形成一组19张面孔。然后,参与者对面具状的三维面孔形状的视觉或触觉成对相似度进行评分。多维标度分析表明,两种模态都提取了符合面孔空间框架关键预测的知觉空间,因此为触觉和视觉中复杂面孔形状的相似加工提供了支持。然而,尽管总体上相似,但视觉和触觉数据之间也出现了系统性差异。将在面孔加工以及视觉和触觉中的复杂形状加工背景下讨论这些差异。