• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

朝向人类视觉系统中面部和物体识别的统一模型。

Toward a unified model of face and object recognition in the human visual system.

机构信息

Centre for Sensorimotor Neuroscience, School of Human Movement Studies, University of Queensland QLD, Australia.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2013 Aug 15;4:497. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00497. eCollection 2013.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00497
PMID:23966963
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3744012/
Abstract

Our understanding of the mechanisms and neural substrates underlying visual recognition has made considerable progress over the past 30 years. During this period, accumulating evidence has led many scientists to conclude that objects and faces are recognised in fundamentally distinct ways, and in fundamentally distinct cortical areas. In the psychological literature, in particular, this dissociation has led to a palpable disconnect between theories of how we process and represent the two classes of object. This paper follows a trend in part of the recognition literature to try to reconcile what we know about these two forms of recognition by considering the effects of learning. Taking a widely accepted, self-organizing model of object recognition, this paper explains how such a system is affected by repeated exposure to specific stimulus classes. In so doing, it explains how many aspects of recognition generally regarded as unusual to faces (holistic processing, configural processing, sensitivity to inversion, the other-race effect, the prototype effect, etc.) are emergent properties of category-specific learning within such a system. Overall, the paper describes how a single model of recognition learning can and does produce the seemingly very different types of representation associated with faces and objects.

摘要

在过去的 30 年里,我们对视觉识别的机制和神经基础的理解取得了相当大的进展。在这期间,越来越多的证据使许多科学家得出结论,物体和面孔是以根本不同的方式被识别的,并且是在根本不同的皮质区域中被识别的。在心理学文献中,特别是,这种分离导致了我们处理和表示这两类物体的理论之间明显的脱节。本文遵循部分识别文献中的一个趋势,试图通过考虑学习的影响来调和我们对这两种识别形式的了解。本文采用了一种被广泛接受的、自组织的物体识别模型,解释了这样一个系统如何受到重复接触特定刺激类别的影响。这样做,它解释了许多通常被认为是面孔特有的识别方面(整体处理、结构处理、对反转的敏感性、异族效应、原型效应等)是如何在这样的系统中出现的类别特定学习的特性。总的来说,本文描述了一个单一的识别学习模型是如何以及如何产生与面孔和物体相关的看似非常不同的表示类型的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8fc/3744012/f06927738205/fpsyg-04-00497-a0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8fc/3744012/385836fdf447/fpsyg-04-00497-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8fc/3744012/d3a7ec0f927e/fpsyg-04-00497-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8fc/3744012/5686a00a681c/fpsyg-04-00497-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8fc/3744012/7eff67f0de4b/fpsyg-04-00497-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8fc/3744012/c790580626f1/fpsyg-04-00497-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8fc/3744012/62795cbf066b/fpsyg-04-00497-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8fc/3744012/a398a36acb8d/fpsyg-04-00497-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8fc/3744012/3cf863741213/fpsyg-04-00497-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8fc/3744012/e0ec43c906fc/fpsyg-04-00497-g0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8fc/3744012/12971936b9b8/fpsyg-04-00497-g0010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8fc/3744012/a8fa5ed2b555/fpsyg-04-00497-g0011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8fc/3744012/56b5ccb72839/fpsyg-04-00497-g0012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8fc/3744012/012b21ec8f46/fpsyg-04-00497-g0013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8fc/3744012/256cde9b2a95/fpsyg-04-00497-g0014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8fc/3744012/f06927738205/fpsyg-04-00497-a0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8fc/3744012/385836fdf447/fpsyg-04-00497-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8fc/3744012/d3a7ec0f927e/fpsyg-04-00497-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8fc/3744012/5686a00a681c/fpsyg-04-00497-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8fc/3744012/7eff67f0de4b/fpsyg-04-00497-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8fc/3744012/c790580626f1/fpsyg-04-00497-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8fc/3744012/62795cbf066b/fpsyg-04-00497-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8fc/3744012/a398a36acb8d/fpsyg-04-00497-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8fc/3744012/3cf863741213/fpsyg-04-00497-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8fc/3744012/e0ec43c906fc/fpsyg-04-00497-g0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8fc/3744012/12971936b9b8/fpsyg-04-00497-g0010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8fc/3744012/a8fa5ed2b555/fpsyg-04-00497-g0011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8fc/3744012/56b5ccb72839/fpsyg-04-00497-g0012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8fc/3744012/012b21ec8f46/fpsyg-04-00497-g0013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8fc/3744012/256cde9b2a95/fpsyg-04-00497-g0014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8fc/3744012/f06927738205/fpsyg-04-00497-a0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Toward a unified model of face and object recognition in the human visual system.朝向人类视觉系统中面部和物体识别的统一模型。
Front Psychol. 2013 Aug 15;4:497. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00497. eCollection 2013.
2
Inversion Impairs Expert Budgerigar Identity Recognition: A Face-Like Effect for a Nonface Object of Expertise.倒置会损害虎皮鹦鹉专家的身份识别:对专业领域的非面部物体产生类似面部的效应。
Perception. 2018 Jun;47(6):647-659. doi: 10.1177/0301006618771806. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
3
Using representational similarity analysis to reveal category and process specificity in visual object recognition.采用表象相似性分析揭示视觉物体识别中的类别和过程特异性。
Cortex. 2023 Sep;166:172-187. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2023.05.012. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
4
The prototype effect revisited: Evidence for an abstract feature model of face recognition.重新审视原型效应:人脸识别抽象特征模型的证据
J Vis. 2008 Mar 24;8(3):20.1-15. doi: 10.1167/8.3.20.
5
Developmental Commonalities between Object and Face Recognition in Adolescence.青少年期物体识别与面部识别之间的发育共性
Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 15;7:385. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00385. eCollection 2016.
6
The face inversion effect or the face upright effect?面部倒置效应还是面部正立效应?
Cognition. 2023 Mar;232:105335. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105335. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
7
Performance of a Computational Model of the Mammalian Olfactory System哺乳动物嗅觉系统计算模型的性能
8
The "parts and wholes" of face recognition: A review of the literature.人脸识别的“局部与整体”:文献综述
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016 Oct;69(10):1876-89. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1146780. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
9
Organization of face and object recognition in modular neural network models.模块化神经网络模型中面部与物体识别的组织方式
Neural Netw. 1999 Oct;12(7-8):1053-1074. doi: 10.1016/s0893-6080(99)00050-7.
10
Familiar other-race faces show normal holistic processing and are robust to perceptual stress.熟悉的其他种族面孔表现出正常的整体加工,并且对感知压力具有耐受性。
Perception. 2007;36(2):224-48. doi: 10.1068/p5499.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigating the neural effects of typicality and predictability for face and object stimuli.探究面孔和物体刺激的典型性和可预测性的神经效应。
PLoS One. 2024 May 22;19(5):e0293781. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293781. eCollection 2024.
2
Varying sex and identity of faces affects face categorization differently in humans and computational models.人脸的性别和身份的变化对人类和计算模型的面部分类有不同的影响。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 26;13(1):16120. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43169-9.
3
Face dissimilarity judgments are predicted by representational distance in morphable and image-computable models.

本文引用的文献

1
Learning Invariance from Transformation Sequences.从变换序列中学习不变性。
Neural Comput. 1991 Summer;3(2):194-200. doi: 10.1162/neco.1991.3.2.194.
2
Face-selective cells in the temporal cortex of monkeys.猴子颞叶皮层中的面孔选择性细胞。
J Cogn Neurosci. 1991 Winter;3(1):1-8. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1991.3.1.1.
3
Not just the norm: exemplar-based models also predict face aftereffects.不仅是常态:基于范例的模型也可以预测面部后效。
基于可变形模型和图像计算模型的表示距离预测面部相似度判断。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Jul 5;119(27):e2115047119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2115047119. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
4
A nonverbal route to conceptual knowledge involving the right anterior temporal lobe.涉及右前颞叶的非言语概念知识途径。
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Aug;117:92-101. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.05.019. Epub 2018 May 23.
5
Preference for facial averageness: Evidence for a common mechanism in human and macaque infants.对面孔平均性的偏好:人类和猕猴婴儿中共同机制的证据。
Sci Rep. 2017 Apr 13;7:46303. doi: 10.1038/srep46303.
6
Discrimination of human faces by archerfish (Toxotes chatareus).射水鱼(Toxotes chatareus)对人类面孔的辨别。
Sci Rep. 2016 Jun 7;6:27523. doi: 10.1038/srep27523.
7
A specialized face-processing model inspired by the organization of monkey face patches explains several face-specific phenomena observed in humans.一个受猴子脸部区域组织启发的专门化脸部处理模型,解释了在人类身上观察到的几种特定于脸部的现象。
Sci Rep. 2016 Apr 26;6:25025. doi: 10.1038/srep25025.
8
Integration or separation in the processing of facial properties--a computational view.面部特征处理中的整合或分离——一种计算视角
Sci Rep. 2016 Feb 2;6:20247. doi: 10.1038/srep20247.
9
The Invariance Hypothesis Implies Domain-Specific Regions in Visual Cortex.不变性假说意味着视觉皮层中存在特定领域的区域。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2015 Oct 23;11(10):e1004390. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004390. eCollection 2015 Oct.
10
On the particular vulnerability of face recognition to aging: a review of three hypotheses.论人脸识别对衰老的特殊易损性:三种假说综述
Front Psychol. 2015 Aug 21;6:1139. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01139. eCollection 2015.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Feb;21(1):47-70. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0449-5.
4
Individual differences in holistic processing predict the own-race advantage in recognition memory.整体加工的个体差异预测了再认记忆中的种族优势。
PLoS One. 2013 Apr 10;8(4):e58253. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058253. Print 2013.
5
Holistic processing for other-race faces in chinese participants occurs for upright but not inverted faces.中国人对面孔的整体加工仅发生在正立而非倒立的面孔上。
Front Psychol. 2013 Jan 31;4:29. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00029. eCollection 2013.
6
Electrical stimulation of human fusiform face-selective regions distorts face perception.电刺激人类梭状回面孔选择性区域会扭曲面孔感知。
J Neurosci. 2012 Oct 24;32(43):14915-20. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2609-12.2012.
7
High-resolution imaging of expertise reveals reliable object selectivity in the fusiform face area related to perceptual performance.高分辨率成像的专长揭示了梭状回面孔区与知觉表现相关的可靠的物体选择性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Oct 16;109(42):17063-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1116333109. Epub 2012 Oct 1.
8
Extensive visual training in adulthood significantly reduces the face inversion effect.成年期进行大量视觉训练可显著降低面部倒置效应。
J Vis. 2012 Sep 26;12(10):14. doi: 10.1167/12.10.14.
9
Invariant recognition of visual objects: some emerging computational principles.视觉对象的不变识别:一些新出现的计算原理。
Front Comput Neurosci. 2012 Aug 24;6:60. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2012.00060. eCollection 2012.
10
Focal electrical intracerebral stimulation of a face-sensitive area causes transient prosopagnosia.局灶性电刺激大脑面部敏感区可导致短暂性面孔失认症。
Neuroscience. 2012 Oct 11;222:281-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.07.021. Epub 2012 Jul 17.