Sueki Derrick G, Cleland Joshua A, Wainner Robert S
Department of Physical Therapy, Mount St Mary's College, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Department of Physical Therapy, Franklin Pierce University, Concord, NH, USA.
J Man Manip Ther. 2013 May;21(2):90-102. doi: 10.1179/2042618612Y.0000000027.
The term 'regional interdependence' or RI has recently been introduced into the vernacular of physical therapy and rehabilitation literature as a clinical model of musculoskeletal assessment and intervention. The underlying premise of this model is that seemingly unrelated impairments in remote anatomical regions of the body may contribute to and be associated with a patient's primary report of symptoms. The clinical implication of this premise is that interventions directed at one region of the body will often have effects at remote and seeming unrelated areas. The formalized concept of RI is relatively new and was originally derived in an inductive manner from a variety of earlier publications and clinical observations. However, recent literature has provided additional support to the concept. The primary purpose of this article will be to further refine the operational definition for the concept of RI, examine supporting literature, discuss possible clinically relevant mechanisms, and conclude with a discussion of the implications of these findings on clinical practice and research.
“区域相互依存”(RI)这一术语最近已被引入物理治疗与康复文献的常用语中,作为一种肌肉骨骼评估与干预的临床模型。该模型的基本前提是,身体远处解剖区域看似无关的损伤可能导致患者的主要症状报告,并与之相关。这一前提的临床意义在于,针对身体一个区域的干预往往会对远处且看似无关的区域产生影响。RI的形式化概念相对较新,最初是以归纳方式从各种早期出版物和临床观察中推导出来的。然而,最近的文献为这一概念提供了更多支持。本文的主要目的将是进一步完善RI概念的操作定义,审视支持性文献,讨论可能的临床相关机制,并最后讨论这些发现对临床实践和研究的影响。