Berguerand Céline, Rossi Noemie, Caliesch Rahel
School of Health and Sciences, HES-SO Valais-Wallis - Switzerland.
Arch Physiother. 2025 Jun 24;15:165-173. doi: 10.33393/aop.2025.3381. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
INTRODUCTION: The physiotherapeutic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) is a topic of growing interest in the literature. The aim of this study is to present all of the treatment modalities used in scientific research in order to analyze the extent to which the protocols are explicit. METHOD: This is a scoping review. The literature search was performed using the Cochrane, Embase and PubMed databases. The data was collected in various tables and the protocols were assessed using the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) and the Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT) tools. RESULTS: Twenty-four studies were selected and 30 protocols were analyzed. The most frequently reported treatment modalities were strengthening (n = 25), manual therapy (n = 22) and stretching (n = 21). The average total score was 47% for studies evaluated by the TIDieR checklist and 40% for studies evaluated by the CERT checklist. DISCUSSION: The treatment modalities identified are similar to those used for other musculoskeletal conditions. Specific treatments were found and were generally consistent with the clinical characteristics of FAIS. The lack of precision in the reporting of interventions compromises their clinical use. The same lack of detail is noted for other physiotherapeutic interventions in the musculoskeletal field. CONCLUSION: Numerous treatment methods are presented in the literature. However, the protocols lack in explicitness and the use of the TIDieR and CERT evaluation grids is not widespread.
引言:股骨髋臼撞击综合征(FAIS)的物理治疗是文献中日益受到关注的一个话题。本研究的目的是展示科学研究中使用的所有治疗方式,以便分析这些方案的明确程度。 方法:这是一项范围综述。使用Cochrane、Embase和PubMed数据库进行文献检索。数据收集在各种表格中,并使用干预描述与复制模板(TIDieR)和运动报告模板共识(CERT)工具对方案进行评估。 结果:选取了24项研究并分析了30种方案。最常报告的治疗方式是强化训练(n = 25)、手法治疗(n = 22)和拉伸(n = 21)。通过TIDieR清单评估的研究平均总分是47%,通过CERT清单评估的研究平均总分是40%。 讨论:确定的治疗方式与用于其他肌肉骨骼疾病的方式相似。发现了特定的治疗方法,并且总体上与FAIS的临床特征一致。干预措施报告缺乏精确性影响了其临床应用。在肌肉骨骼领域的其他物理治疗干预中也存在同样的细节缺失问题。 结论:文献中介绍了多种治疗方法。然而,方案缺乏明确性,并且TIDieR和CERT评估网格的使用并不广泛。
Health Technol Assess. 2001
Health Technol Assess. 2006-9
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-1-14
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-4-24
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-4-19
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-1-16
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-9-19
Musculoskeletal Care. 2022-12