Suppr超能文献

运动学习无法解释口吃的适应。

Motor learning cannot explain stuttering adaptation.

机构信息

Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.

JSS Institute of Speech and Hearing, Mysore, India.

出版信息

Percept Mot Skills. 2013 Aug;117(1):1235-42. doi: 10.2466/25.23.pms.117x16z4.

Abstract

When persons who stutter (PWS) read a text repeatedly, there is a progressive reduction in stutter frequency over the course of three to five readings. Recently, this phenomenon has been attributed by some researchers to motor learning-the acquisition of relatively permanent motor skills that facilitate fluency through practice in producing words. The current study tested this explanation. 23 PWS read prose passages five times in succession. The number of 'new' and 'old' stutters during repeated readings (words stuttered in the current reading but spoken fluently in the previous reading and words stuttered also in the previous reading) were analyzed. If motor learning facilitated fluency during repeated readings in PWS, words read fluently in a reading should not be stuttered in a later reading in significant numbers. Contrary to this prediction, there was no statistical difference in the number of new words stuttered across five readings. A plausible alternative explanation, which requires further study to verify, is offered.

摘要

当口吃者(PWS)反复阅读一段文本时,在三到五次阅读的过程中,口吃的频率会逐渐降低。最近,一些研究人员将这一现象归因于运动学习——通过练习产生单词来获得相对永久的运动技能,从而促进流畅性。本研究检验了这一解释。23 名口吃者连续五次阅读散文段落。在重复阅读过程中(当前阅读中口吃但在前一次阅读中说得流利的单词,以及在前一次阅读中也口吃的单词),分析了“新”和“旧”口吃的数量。如果运动学习在 PWS 的重复阅读中促进了流畅性,那么在后面的阅读中,不应有大量流利阅读的单词被口吃。与这一预测相反,在五次阅读中,新口吃的单词数量没有统计学差异。提供了一个需要进一步研究来验证的合理替代解释。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验