Suppr超能文献

运动学习无法解释口吃的适应。

Motor learning cannot explain stuttering adaptation.

机构信息

Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.

JSS Institute of Speech and Hearing, Mysore, India.

出版信息

Percept Mot Skills. 2013 Aug;117(1):1235-42. doi: 10.2466/25.23.pms.117x16z4.

Abstract

When persons who stutter (PWS) read a text repeatedly, there is a progressive reduction in stutter frequency over the course of three to five readings. Recently, this phenomenon has been attributed by some researchers to motor learning-the acquisition of relatively permanent motor skills that facilitate fluency through practice in producing words. The current study tested this explanation. 23 PWS read prose passages five times in succession. The number of 'new' and 'old' stutters during repeated readings (words stuttered in the current reading but spoken fluently in the previous reading and words stuttered also in the previous reading) were analyzed. If motor learning facilitated fluency during repeated readings in PWS, words read fluently in a reading should not be stuttered in a later reading in significant numbers. Contrary to this prediction, there was no statistical difference in the number of new words stuttered across five readings. A plausible alternative explanation, which requires further study to verify, is offered.

摘要

当口吃者(PWS)反复阅读一段文本时,在三到五次阅读的过程中,口吃的频率会逐渐降低。最近,一些研究人员将这一现象归因于运动学习——通过练习产生单词来获得相对永久的运动技能,从而促进流畅性。本研究检验了这一解释。23 名口吃者连续五次阅读散文段落。在重复阅读过程中(当前阅读中口吃但在前一次阅读中说得流利的单词,以及在前一次阅读中也口吃的单词),分析了“新”和“旧”口吃的数量。如果运动学习在 PWS 的重复阅读中促进了流畅性,那么在后面的阅读中,不应有大量流利阅读的单词被口吃。与这一预测相反,在五次阅读中,新口吃的单词数量没有统计学差异。提供了一个需要进一步研究来验证的合理替代解释。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验