Suppr超能文献

两种类型的运动练习对口吃适应性的影响。

Effects of two types of motor practice on stuttering adaptation.

作者信息

Bruce M C, Adams M R

出版信息

J Speech Hear Res. 1978 Sep;21(3):421-8. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2103.421.

Abstract

The present study identifies and compares the effects of two types of motor practice on stuttering adaptation. The study was designed to determine if whispered reading practice affects stuttering adaptation, and if practice in reading aloud is superior to whispered reading in promoting adaptation. In a control condition, eight stutterers read one of two matched passages aloud five times in succession. In an experimental condition, the remaining passage was read aloud on the first and fifth trials, and was read in a whisper on Trials 2, 3, and 4. The results indicated that (1) the stutterers' adaptation in the control condition was similar to the typical course of adaptation, (2) the three intervening whispered readings in the experimental condition neither inhibited nor facilitated adaptation, and (3) practice in reading aloud was superior to whispered practice in promoting stuttering adaptation. It was concluded that whispered reading practice does not facilitate stuttering adaptation when the measurement of that process requires reading aloud. Traditionally, adaptation has been measured only during reading done aloud. Consequently, practice in reading aloud has the greatest positive influence on the adaptation process.

摘要

本研究识别并比较了两种类型的言语练习对口吃适应性的影响。该研究旨在确定轻声阅读练习是否会影响口吃适应性,以及大声朗读练习在促进适应性方面是否优于轻声阅读。在对照条件下,8名口吃者连续5次大声朗读两篇匹配段落中的一篇。在实验条件下,另一篇段落则在第1次和第5次朗读时大声朗读,在第2、3和4次朗读时轻声朗读。结果表明:(1)口吃者在对照条件下的适应性与典型的适应过程相似;(2)实验条件下的三次中间轻声朗读既没有抑制也没有促进适应性;(3)大声朗读练习在促进口吃适应性方面优于轻声朗读练习。得出的结论是,当对口吃适应性的测量需要大声朗读时,轻声阅读练习并不能促进口吃适应性。传统上,适应性仅在大声朗读时进行测量。因此,大声朗读练习对适应过程具有最大的积极影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验