• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

依巴斯汀速释片与普通片的比较:变应性鼻炎患者的可接受性和偏好。

Ebastine fast-dissolving tablets versus regular tablets: acceptability and preference in patients with allergic rhinitis.

机构信息

Centre Roger Barri d'Asmologia i Allèrgia, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2008 May;1(3):381-9. doi: 10.1586/17512433.1.3.381.

DOI:10.1586/17512433.1.3.381
PMID:24422693
Abstract

A new fast-dissolving tablet (FDT) formulation of ebastine has been developed that dissolves rapidly in the mouth without the need for water. This new formulation of ebastine FDT offers an opportunity to tailor prescribing in a way that meets patient's preferences. The aim of the reported study was to evaluate the preferences of allergic rhinitis patients who were given either a placebo version of ebastine FDT or a placebo version of ebastine regular tablet (RT). Allergic rhinitis patients from Germany, Italy and Mexico, who were regular consumers of oral antihistamines, were recruited to a randomized, crossover study comparing placebo forms of ebastine FDT and ebastine RT. Patients were interviewed at home and were given both a FDT and RT (10 and 20 mg doses were used with a 1:1 ratio). Data on patient preferences were recorded by an interviewer and analyzed using descriptive statistics. A total of 420 individuals participated (140 in each country), 70% with intermittent and 24% with persistent allergic rhinitis. Using a rating scale of 0-10 and comparing mean values, ebastine FDT was statistically significantly better than RT for: sensation on dissolving (8.30 FDT vs 6.79 RT); taste it leaves in the mouth (8.10 FDT vs 6.60 RT); initial taste (8.07 FDT vs 6.63 RT); and texture (7.85 FDT vs 7.20 RT). Rapidity of dissolution was rated 8.67 for FDT. With the same scale, RT rated statistically significantly better than ebastine FDT for: appearance (7.46 RT vs 6.85 FDT); size (7.38 RT vs 7.06 FDT); and shape (7.55 RT vs 7.24 FDT). General evaluation was statistically significantly better for ebastine FDT (8.21 FDT vs 7.05 RT). Overall, 83% of patients preferred ebastine FDT to RT, 92% considered it to be more innovative, 90% that it was suitable to be taken without water and that it was technologically advanced, and 87% that it was suitable for taking at any time and anywhere, and that it had a refreshing taste. Ebastine FDT formulation is preferred to the RT by the majority of allergic rhinitis patients, rating most highly for dissolution, taste and texture.

摘要

一种新的埃巴斯汀速溶片(FDT)制剂已经被开发出来,它可以在口中迅速溶解,无需用水。这种新的埃巴斯汀 FDT 制剂为满足患者的需求提供了一种定制处方的机会。本研究旨在评估接受埃巴斯汀 FDT 安慰剂或埃巴斯汀普通片(RT)安慰剂的过敏性鼻炎患者的偏好。从德国、意大利和墨西哥招募经常使用口服抗组胺药的过敏性鼻炎患者,参加一项比较埃巴斯汀 FDT 安慰剂和埃巴斯汀 RT 安慰剂的随机交叉研究。在家中对患者进行访谈,并给他们服用 FDT 和 RT(使用 1:1 比例的 10 毫克和 20 毫克剂量)。通过访谈者记录患者偏好数据,并使用描述性统计进行分析。共有 420 人参与(每个国家 140 人),70%为间歇性过敏性鼻炎,24%为持续性过敏性鼻炎。使用 0-10 的评分量表并比较平均值,埃巴斯汀 FDT 在以下方面明显优于 RT:溶解时的感觉(FDT 为 8.30,RT 为 6.79);口中残留的味道(FDT 为 8.10,RT 为 6.60);初始味道(FDT 为 8.07,RT 为 6.63);质地(FDT 为 7.85,RT 为 7.20)。FDT 的溶解速度评分为 8.67。使用相同的量表,RT 在以下方面明显优于埃巴斯汀 FDT:外观(RT 为 7.46,FDT 为 6.85);大小(RT 为 7.38,FDT 为 7.06);形状(RT 为 7.55,FDT 为 7.24)。总体评价明显优于埃巴斯汀 FDT(FDT 为 8.21,RT 为 7.05)。总体而言,83%的患者更喜欢埃巴斯汀 FDT 而非 RT,92%认为它更具创新性,90%认为它适合无需用水服用,技术先进,87%认为它适合随时随地服用,味道清新。大多数过敏性鼻炎患者更喜欢埃巴斯汀 FDT 制剂,对溶解、味道和质地的评价最高。

相似文献

1
Ebastine fast-dissolving tablets versus regular tablets: acceptability and preference in patients with allergic rhinitis.依巴斯汀速释片与普通片的比较:变应性鼻炎患者的可接受性和偏好。
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2008 May;1(3):381-9. doi: 10.1586/17512433.1.3.381.
2
Patient assessment of onset of action and overall satisfaction with ebastine fast-dissolving tablets in allergic rhinitis.患者对依巴斯汀速溶片在变应性鼻炎中起效时间和总体满意度的评估。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2008 Aug;8(4):337-42. doi: 10.1586/14737167.8.4.337.
3
Ebastine in allergic rhinitis and chronic idiopathic urticaria.依巴斯汀在变应性鼻炎和慢性特发性荨麻疹中的应用
Allergy. 2008 Dec;63 Suppl 89:1-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2008.01897.x.
4
[Multicenter study of satisfaction with fast-dissolving ebastine, 20 mg/ day, in Mexican patients with allergic rhinitis].
Rev Alerg Mex. 2009 Mar-Apr;56(2):36-40.
5
Treating depression with different galenical drug formulations: Does it make a difference? The comparison of mirtazapine fast dissolving formulation (FDT) with conventional mirtazapine tablets (CT).用不同剂型的药物治疗抑郁症:有区别吗?米氮平速释制剂(FDT)与常规米氮平片(CT)的比较。
Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2009;13(2):109-16. doi: 10.1080/13651500802485262.
6
Acceptance survey of a fast dissolving tablet pharmaceutical formulation in allergic patients. Satisfaction and expectancies.速溶片药物制剂在过敏患者中的接受度调查。满意度与期望。
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 2006 May-Jun;34(3):107-12. doi: 10.1157/13088176.
7
Comparison of efficacy and safety of cetirizine and ebastine in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis.西替利嗪与依巴斯汀治疗常年性变应性鼻炎的疗效和安全性比较。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1998 May;80(5):399-403. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62991-2.
8
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study comparing the efficacy and safety of ebastine (20 mg and 10 mg) to loratadine 10 mg once daily in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究,比较依巴斯汀(20毫克和10毫克)与氯雷他定10毫克每日一次治疗季节性变应性鼻炎的疗效和安全性。
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2004;14(1):56-63.
9
Comparison of ebastine to cetirizine in seasonal allergic rhinitis in adults.成人季节性过敏性鼻炎中依巴斯汀与西替利嗪的比较。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1996 Jun;76(6):507-12. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)63269-3.
10
[Investigation of the efficacy and tolerability of azelastine nasal spray versus ebastine tablets in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis].氮卓斯汀鼻喷雾剂与依巴斯汀片治疗季节性变应性鼻炎的疗效及耐受性研究
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 1998 Jan-Feb;26(1):9-16.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and Optimization of Oral Dissolution Films for Enhanced Delivery of Ebastine-Loaded Solid Lipid Nanoparticles.用于增强载依巴斯汀固体脂质纳米粒递送的口腔崩解膜的开发与优化
Int J Nanomedicine. 2025 May 30;20:6963-6981. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S521504. eCollection 2025.
2
Improved Bioavailability of Ebastine through Development of Transfersomal Oral Films.通过开发传递体口腔膜提高依巴斯汀的生物利用度。
Pharmaceutics. 2021 Aug 23;13(8):1315. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13081315.
3
Ebastine in the light of CONGA recommendations for the development of third-generation antihistamines.
依巴斯汀——基于 CONGA 推荐的第三代抗组胺药物研发
J Asthma Allergy. 2009 Aug 31;2:73-92. doi: 10.2147/jaa.s3108.
4
Clinical utility and patient adherence with ebastine for allergic rhinitis.依巴斯汀治疗变应性鼻炎的临床效用及患者依从性
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2010 Oct 14;4:389-95. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S8186.
5
Patients' preference for olanzapine orodispersible tablet compared with conventional oral tablet in a multinational, randomized, crossover study.一项多中心、随机、交叉研究比较了奥氮平口崩片与普通口服片剂在患者中的偏好。
World J Biol Psychiatry. 2010 Oct;11(7):894-903. doi: 10.3109/15622975.2010.505663.