• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用不同剂型的药物治疗抑郁症:有区别吗?米氮平速释制剂(FDT)与常规米氮平片(CT)的比较。

Treating depression with different galenical drug formulations: Does it make a difference? The comparison of mirtazapine fast dissolving formulation (FDT) with conventional mirtazapine tablets (CT).

机构信息

ADI International Institute for Drug Development, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2009;13(2):109-16. doi: 10.1080/13651500802485262.

DOI:10.1080/13651500802485262
PMID:24916729
Abstract

Objective. To assess clinical advantages of fast dissolving tablet (FDT) formulation of mirtazapine by comparison to conventional (CT) mirtazapine tablets in the treatment of depressed patients. Methods. A posteriori analyses of pooled data of a total of 30 studies (of at least 6 weeks duration, total N=3510) with CT and FDT in depressed patients was performed. Weight changes were recorded at baseline and regular intervals until the end of the study. Patient preferences for the one or the other formulation, as well as the appraisal of the FDT qualities, were assessed by means of a global internet-based survey including 5,428 patients. Results. Compared with mirtazapine CT, the FDT was associated with an average 0.3 kg less weight increase (P=0.0015) during the 6 weeks of treatment. The qualities and preference for FDT (global survey) were positively evaluated by the majority of patients. Particular advantages of FDT over CT were: better compliance (47.3% of raters), taste, ease and overall convenience of use (>75% of raters). Conclusions. The FDT mirtazapine differed from conventional tablets (CT) not only regarding somewhat less weight increase and overall use preference, but more importantly, regarding better compliance with treatment.

摘要

目的。通过比较米氮平速释片(FDT)与传统米氮平片剂(CT)在治疗抑郁症患者方面的临床优势,评估 FDT 制剂的临床优势。方法。对共 30 项研究(至少 6 周疗程,总 N=3510)的汇总数据进行回顾性分析,这些研究比较了 FDT 和 CT 在抑郁症患者中的疗效。记录患者在基线和研究结束前的定期时间点的体重变化。通过一项包含 5428 名患者的基于互联网的全球调查评估患者对一种或另一种制剂的偏好,以及对 FDT 质量的评价。结果。与米氮平 CT 相比,在治疗的 6 周内,FDT 平均体重增加减少了 0.3 公斤(P=0.0015)。大多数患者对 FDT 的质量和偏好给予了积极评价。FDT 相对于 CT 的主要优势在于:更好的顺应性(47.3%的评价者)、口感、使用方便性(>75%的评价者)。结论。FDT 米氮平与传统片剂(CT)不仅在体重增加和总体使用偏好方面存在差异,而且更重要的是在治疗的顺应性方面具有优势。

相似文献

1
Treating depression with different galenical drug formulations: Does it make a difference? The comparison of mirtazapine fast dissolving formulation (FDT) with conventional mirtazapine tablets (CT).用不同剂型的药物治疗抑郁症:有区别吗?米氮平速释制剂(FDT)与常规米氮平片(CT)的比较。
Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2009;13(2):109-16. doi: 10.1080/13651500802485262.
2
The results of the Swiss observational study of the new, fast-dissolving mirtazapine formulation in depressed patients.《新型快速溶解米氮平制剂治疗抑郁症患者的瑞士观察性研究结果》。
Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2006;10(2):124-30. doi: 10.1080/13651500600579175.
3
Ebastine fast-dissolving tablets versus regular tablets: acceptability and preference in patients with allergic rhinitis.依巴斯汀速释片与普通片的比较:变应性鼻炎患者的可接受性和偏好。
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2008 May;1(3):381-9. doi: 10.1586/17512433.1.3.381.
4
Patient assessment of onset of action and overall satisfaction with ebastine fast-dissolving tablets in allergic rhinitis.患者对依巴斯汀速溶片在变应性鼻炎中起效时间和总体满意度的评估。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2008 Aug;8(4):337-42. doi: 10.1586/14737167.8.4.337.
5
Development of a fast-dissolving tablet formulation of a live attenuated enterotoxigenic E. coli vaccine candidate.开发一种口服减毒肠产毒性大肠杆菌候选活疫苗的速溶片制剂。
Vaccine. 2013 Oct 1;31(42):4759-64. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.08.010. Epub 2013 Aug 17.
6
Mirtazapine orally disintegrating tablet versus sertraline: a prospective onset of action study.米氮平口腔崩解片与舍曲林:一项前瞻性起效研究
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2003 Aug;23(4):358-64. doi: 10.1097/01.jcp.0000085408.08426.05.
7
Stability of an alternative extemporaneous captopril fast-dispersing tablet formulation versus an extemporaneous oral liquid formulation.卡托普利速释口崩片替代制剂与口服液体制剂的稳定性比较。
Clin Ther. 2012 Nov;34(11):2221-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.10.005.
8
Open-label study of mirtazapine orally disintegrating tablets in depressed patients in the nursing home.米氮平口腔崩解片用于养老院抑郁症患者的开放标签研究。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2003;19(8):737-46. doi: 10.1185/030079903125002441.
9
A multicenter, open-label, sequential study comparing preferences for carbidopa-levodopa orally disintegrating tablets and conventional tablets in subjects with Parkinson's disease.一项多中心、开放标签、序贯研究,比较帕金森病患者对卡比多巴-左旋多巴口腔崩解片和常规片剂的偏好。
Clin Ther. 2005 Jan;27(1):58-63. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.01.004.
10
The effect of mirtazapine in patients with chronic pain and concomitant depression.米氮平对慢性疼痛伴发抑郁症患者的疗效。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2006 Feb;22(2):257-64. doi: 10.1185/030079906X80486.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient preferences for treatment of major depressive disorder and the impact on health outcomes: a systematic review.重度抑郁症治疗的患者偏好及其对健康结局的影响:一项系统评价
Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2011;13(5). doi: 10.4088/PCC.11r01161.