Leibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology (R.I.), 18196 Dummerstorf, Germany; School of Molecular and Biomedical Science (R.I.), University of Adelaide, SA5005, Australia; Department of Animal Sciences (K.T.), Wageningen University, 6709 WD Wageningen, The Netherlands; and Department of Biology (G.E.H.), Morgan State University, Baltimore, Maryland 21251.
Endocrinology. 2014 Mar;155(3):676-87. doi: 10.1210/en.2013-1971. Epub 2014 Jan 15.
For several decades antibodies raised against specific proteins, peptides, or peptide epitopes have proven to be versatile and very powerful tools to demonstrate molecular identity in cells and tissues. New techniques of immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence have improved both the optical resolution of such protein identification as well as its sensitivity, particularly through the use of amplification methodology. However, this improved sensitivity has also increased the risks of false-positive and false-negative staining and thereby raised the necessity for proper and adequate controls. In this review, the authors draw on many years of experience to illuminate many of the more common errors and problematic issues in immunohistochemistry, and how these may be avoided. A key factor in all of this is that techniques need to be properly documented and especially antibodies and procedures must be adequately described. Antibodies are a valuable and shared resource within the scientific community; it is essential therefore that mistakes involving antibodies and their controls are not perpetuated through inadequate reporting in the literature.
几十年来,针对特定蛋白质、肽或肽表位的抗体已被证明是一种非常强大的工具,可用于证明细胞和组织中的分子身份。免疫组织化学和免疫荧光的新技术提高了这种蛋白质鉴定的光学分辨率和灵敏度,特别是通过使用扩增方法。然而,这种灵敏度的提高也增加了假阳性和假阴性染色的风险,从而提高了对适当和充分控制的必要性。在这篇综述中,作者根据多年的经验阐明了免疫组织化学中许多更常见的错误和有问题的问题,以及如何避免这些问题。所有这些的一个关键因素是,技术需要得到妥善记录,特别是抗体和程序必须得到充分描述。抗体是科学界宝贵的共享资源;因此,至关重要的是,通过文献中不充分的报告,避免因抗体及其对照物的错误而使问题持续存在。