Prata Ndola, Bell Suzanne, Holston Martine, Quaiyum Mohammad A
Bixby Center for Population, Health and Sustainability, School of Public Health, University of California at Berkeley, 229 University Hall, UC-Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720-7360, USA.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Jan 16;14:24. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-24.
Hemorrhage is the leading cause of maternal mortality in Bangladesh, the majority of which is due to postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), blood loss of 500 mL or more. Many deaths due to PPH occur at home where approximately 77% of births take place. This paper aims to determine whether the attendant at home delivery (i.e. traditional birth attendant (TBA) trained on PPH interventions, TBA not trained on interventions, or lay attendant) is associated with the use of interventions to prevent PPH at home births.
Data come from operations research to determine the safety, feasibility, and acceptability of scaling-up community-based provision of misoprostol and an absorbent delivery mat in rural Bangladesh. Analyses were done using data from antenatal care (ANC) cards of women who delivered at home without a skilled attendant (N =66,489). Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the likelihood of using the interventions.
Overall, 67% of women who delivered at home without a skilled provider used misoprostol and the delivery mat (the interventions). Women who delivered at home and had a trained TBA present had 2.72 (95% confidence interval, 2.15-3.43) times the odds of using the interventions compared to those who had a lay person present. With each additional ANC visit (maximum of 4) a woman attended, the odds of using the interventions increased 2.76 times (95% confidence interval, 2.71-2.81). Other sociodemographic variables positively associated with use of the interventions were age, secondary or higher education, and having had a previous birth.
Findings indicate that trained TBAs can have a significant impact on utilization of interventions to prevent PPH in home births. ANC visits can be an important point of contact for knowledge transfer and message reinforcement about PPH prevention.
在孟加拉国,出血是孕产妇死亡的主要原因,其中大部分是由于产后出血(PPH),即失血500毫升或更多。许多因产后出血导致的死亡发生在家庭中,约77%的分娩在此进行。本文旨在确定在家分娩时的陪同人员(即接受过产后出血干预培训的传统助产士、未接受过干预培训的传统助产士或外行人)是否与在家分娩时使用预防产后出血的干预措施有关。
数据来自一项运筹学研究,以确定在孟加拉国农村扩大基于社区的米索前列醇和吸水接生垫供应的安全性、可行性和可接受性。分析使用了在家分娩且无熟练助产人员的妇女的产前保健(ANC)卡数据(N = 66489)。采用多变量逻辑回归评估使用干预措施的可能性。
总体而言,在家分娩且无熟练助产人员的妇女中,67%使用了米索前列醇和接生垫(干预措施)。与有外行人在场的妇女相比,在家分娩时有经过培训的传统助产士在场的妇女使用干预措施的几率高出2.72倍(95%置信区间,2.15 - 3.43)。妇女每多参加一次产前保健就诊(最多4次),使用干预措施的几率就增加2.76倍(95%置信区间,2.71 - 2.81)。与使用干预措施呈正相关的其他社会人口统计学变量包括年龄、中学及以上学历以及曾有过生育经历。
研究结果表明,经过培训的传统助产士对在家分娩时预防产后出血干预措施的使用有重大影响。产前保健就诊可以成为关于预防产后出血的知识传授和信息强化的重要接触点。