Mental Health Research Centre, Durham University, Stockton-on-Tees, TS17 6BH, UK.
Personal Ment Health. 2014 May;8(2):91-101. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1252. Epub 2014 Jan 15.
A systematic literature review of studies measuring the prevalence of personality disorder in community secondary care is needed to identify both the met and unmet needs and plan services accordingly.
PsycINFO, MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched using NHS Evidence. Only studies assessing overall personality disorder prevalence within help-seeking, outpatient populations were included. Papers were excluded for focusing solely on the prevalence of specific personality disorders or comorbid prevalence within specific populations.
A total of 269 papers were identified. Nine papers met criteria and were critically appraised, showing a high level of heterogeneity with regards to methods, inclusion criteria, source of information, time of assessment, instruments used and overall quality of research. Prevalence estimates in Europe varied between 40% and 92%, were more consistently approximated between 45% and 51% in the USA and differed significantly in the two Asian studies: 1.07% (India) and 60% (Pakistan).
The prevalence of personality disorder in community mental health care appears to be substantial, but better estimates will only emerge from high quality studies with greater consistency of method. Implementing screening tools within outpatient or community services may result in high rates of personality disorder identification, with both clinical and service implications.
需要对社区二级保健中测量人格障碍患病率的研究进行系统文献回顾,以确定满足和未满足的需求,并相应地规划服务。
使用 NHS Evidence 对 PsycINFO、MEDLINE 和 EMBASE 数据库进行了搜索。仅纳入了评估寻求帮助的门诊人群中整体人格障碍患病率的研究。仅关注特定人格障碍的患病率或特定人群中合并患病率的论文被排除在外。
共确定了 269 篇论文。9 篇论文符合标准并进行了批判性评估,这些论文在方法、纳入标准、信息来源、评估时间、使用的工具以及研究质量方面存在高度异质性。欧洲的患病率估计值在 40%至 92%之间,在美国更为一致,在 45%至 51%之间,而在两项亚洲研究中差异显著:1.07%(印度)和 60%(巴基斯坦)。
社区精神卫生保健中的人格障碍患病率似乎很高,但只有高质量的研究具有更大的方法一致性,才能得出更好的估计。在门诊或社区服务中实施筛查工具可能会导致人格障碍的高识别率,这对临床和服务都有影响。