Mohsen Amr, Jimenez Alejandro, Hood Robert E, Dickfeld Timm, Saliaris Anastasios, Shorofsky Stephen, Saba Magdi M
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Louisville, Kentucky, USA.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014 Feb;25(2):171-6. doi: 10.1111/jce.12302. Epub 2013 Oct 30.
The objectives of this study were to identify the predictors of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) and to evaluate the role of the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) in this patient population.
ICD implantation is a class IIA recommendation for patients with CS. However, some indications for ICD implantation in CS patients are still unclear and not enough data are available to establish predictors of malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmias in this group of patients.
We retrospectively identified all consecutive patients who were diagnosed with CS, during the period from March 2002 to April 2010. Cardiac rhythm devices were regularly interrogated and clinical data recorded during follow-up visits.
Thirty-three patients (17 male) with CS were identified. The mean age was 53 ± 11. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 41 ± 18%. Thirty patients received an ICD. Twelve patients (36.3%) had sustained ventricular arrhythmias. Eleven patients received appropriate therapies and 9 patients received inappropriate shocks, representing 36.7% and 30.0% of the ICD population, respectively. Patients who received appropriate ICD therapies were younger with mean age 47.4 ± 7.8, and had a lower mean LVEF 33.0 ± 12.0 compared to those who did not receive ICD therapies (P = 0.0301 and 0.0341, respectively). There were no other demographic, clinical, electrocardiographic, electrophysiological, or imaging markers that predicted the future occurrence of appropriate ICD therapies in our cohort of patients.
CS is strongly associated with malignant ventricular arrhythmias. No specific predictors of such tachyarrhythmias emerged, other than young age and low LVEF.
本研究的目的是确定心脏结节病(CS)患者危及生命的室性心律失常的预测因素,并评估植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)在该患者群体中的作用。
ICD植入是CS患者的IIA类推荐。然而,CS患者ICD植入的一些指征仍不明确,且尚无足够数据来确定该组患者恶性室性快速心律失常的预测因素。
我们回顾性确定了2002年3月至2010年4月期间所有连续诊断为CS的患者。在随访期间定期对心律装置进行问询并记录临床数据。
共确定33例(17例男性)CS患者。平均年龄为53±11岁。平均左心室射血分数(LVEF)为41±18%。30例患者接受了ICD植入。12例患者(36.3%)发生持续性室性心律失常。11例患者接受了适当治疗,9例患者接受了不适当电击,分别占ICD植入患者群体的36.7%和30.0%。与未接受ICD治疗的患者相比,接受适当ICD治疗的患者更年轻,平均年龄为47.4±7.8岁,平均LVEF更低,为33.0±12.0(P分别为0.0301和0.0341)。在我们的患者队列中,没有其他人口统计学、临床、心电图、电生理或影像学标志物能够预测未来是否会接受适当的ICD治疗。
CS与恶性室性心律失常密切相关。除了年轻和低LVEF外,未发现此类快速心律失常的特定预测因素。