• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非侵入性产前唐氏综合征筛查:服务使用者观点和可能接受度的横断面调查。

Non-invasive prenatal testing for trisomy 21: a cross-sectional survey of service users' views and likely uptake.

机构信息

Genetic Alliance UK, London, UK.

出版信息

BJOG. 2014 Apr;121(5):582-94. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12579. Epub 2014 Jan 17.

DOI:10.1111/1471-0528.12579
PMID:24433394
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the views and likely uptake of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for trisomy 21 among potential service users in the UK.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey.

SETTING

Four antenatal clinics in England and two websites.

SAMPLE

A total of 1131 women and partners.

METHODS

Questionnaire conducted with women (and partners) recruited through antenatal clinics, a random sample of members of the website Mumsnet, and viewers of the website and Facebook page of the support group Antenatal Results and Choices (ARC).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Factors impacting decision-making towards prenatal testing; views on NIPT, including service delivery and likely uptake; hypothetical scenarios, focused on current screening, invasive testing, and NIPT offered to women with a high-risk screening result.

RESULTS

The vast majority (95.7%; 1071/1119; 95% CI 94.4-96.8%) thought NIPT was a positive development in prenatal care, with 88.2% (972/1103; 95% CI 86.1-90%) indicating that they would use the test, including respondents who would currently decline trisomy 21 screening (P < 0.001). Of the respondents who would have NIPT, 30.7% (299/973; 95% CI = 27.8-33.7%) said that they were 'likely' to terminate an affected pregnancy (including those who would currently decline screening or invasive testing), and 36.5% (355/973; 95% CI 33.5-39.6%) were 'not likely' to terminate an affected pregnancy. Respondents overwhelmingly indicated that safety for the baby was the most important attribute of NIPT (70.1%; 712/1015; 95% CI 67.2-73%).

CONCLUSION

Respondents were overwhelmingly positive towards the introduction of NIPT. Uptake is likely to be high, and includes women who currently decline screening as well as those who will use the test for information only. Pre-test counselling to ensure that women understand the implications of the test result is essential.

摘要

目的

评估英国潜在服务使用者对 21 三体非侵入性产前检测(NIPT)的看法和可能采用情况。

设计

横断面调查。

设置

英格兰的 4 家产前诊所和 2 个网站。

样本

共 1131 名女性及其伴侣。

方法

通过产前诊所招募的女性(及其伴侣)、Mumsnet 网站的随机样本成员以及该支持小组 Antenatal Results and Choices(ARC)的网站和 Facebook 页面的观众进行问卷调查。

主要观察指标

影响产前检测决策的因素;对 NIPT 的看法,包括服务提供和可能的采用率;关注当前筛查、有创性检测和高风险筛查结果女性的 NIPT 的假设情景。

结果

绝大多数(95.7%;1071/1119;95%CI 94.4-96.8%)认为 NIPT 是产前保健的一个积极发展,88.2%(972/1103;95%CI 86.1-90%)表示他们将使用该检测,包括目前会拒绝 21 三体筛查的应答者(P < 0.001)。在表示将进行 NIPT 的应答者中,30.7%(299/973;95%CI = 27.8-33.7%)表示他们“可能”终止受影响的妊娠(包括目前会拒绝筛查或有创性检测的应答者),36.5%(355/973;95%CI 33.5-39.6%)“不太可能”终止受影响的妊娠。应答者压倒性地表示,婴儿的安全性是 NIPT 最重要的属性(70.1%;712/1015;95%CI 67.2-73%)。

结论

应答者对引入 NIPT 持压倒性的积极态度。采用率可能很高,包括目前拒绝筛查的女性和仅将该检测用于信息的女性。为确保女性理解检测结果的含义,需要进行产前咨询。

相似文献

1
Non-invasive prenatal testing for trisomy 21: a cross-sectional survey of service users' views and likely uptake.非侵入性产前唐氏综合征筛查:服务使用者观点和可能接受度的横断面调查。
BJOG. 2014 Apr;121(5):582-94. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12579. Epub 2014 Jan 17.
2
Obstetric professionals' perceptions of non-invasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome: clinical usefulness compared with existing tests and ethical implications.产科专业人士对非侵入性产前唐氏综合征筛查的看法:与现有检测方法相比的临床效用及伦理影响。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Sep 5;17(1):285. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1474-6.
3
Women's Experiences and Preferences for Service Delivery of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing for Aneuploidy in a Public Health Setting: A Mixed Methods Study.公共卫生环境下女性接受非侵入性产前基因检测服务的体验与偏好:一项混合方法研究
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 5;11(4):e0153147. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153147. eCollection 2016.
4
Evaluation of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for aneuploidy in an NHS setting: a reliable accurate prenatal non-invasive diagnosis (RAPID) protocol.英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)环境下非侵入性产前检测(NIPT)用于检测非整倍体的评估:一项可靠准确的产前非侵入性诊断(RAPID)方案。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Jul 16;14:229. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-229.
5
Non-invasive prenatal testing for Down's syndrome: pregnant women's views and likely uptake.唐氏综合征的无创产前检测:孕妇的观点及可能的接受情况
Public Health Genomics. 2013;16(5):223-32. doi: 10.1159/000353523. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
6
Prenatal screening in the era of non-invasive prenatal testing: a Nationwide cross-sectional survey of obstetrician knowledge, attitudes and clinical practice.无创产前检测时代的产前筛查:一项关于产科医生知识、态度和临床实践的全国性横断面调查。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Oct 1;20(1):579. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03279-y.
7
Will the introduction of non-invasive prenatal testing for Down's syndrome undermine informed choice?唐氏综合征无创产前检测的引入会破坏知情选择吗?
Health Expect. 2015 Oct;18(5):1658-71. doi: 10.1111/hex.12159. Epub 2014 Feb 20.
8
Women's preference for non-invasive prenatal DNA testing versus chromosomal microarray after screening for Down syndrome: a prospective study.筛查唐氏综合征后,女性对非侵入性产前 DNA 检测与染色体微阵列检测的偏好:一项前瞻性研究。
BJOG. 2018 Mar;125(4):451-459. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15022. Epub 2018 Jan 14.
9
Trial by Dutch laboratories for evaluation of non-invasive prenatal testing. Part II-women's perspectives.荷兰实验室对无创产前检测进行评估的试验。第二部分——女性视角。
Prenat Diagn. 2016 Dec;36(12):1091-1098. doi: 10.1002/pd.4941. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
10
Women's choices in non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy screening: results from a single centre prior to introduction in England.女性在非侵入性产前检测(唐氏综合征筛查)中的选择:英国引入前某单一中心的结果。
Arch Dis Child. 2020 Jan;105(1):47-52. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2019-317031. Epub 2019 Jun 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient Preferences and Understanding of Genome-Wide Cell-Free DNA Screening for Foetal Chromosomal Imbalances: A Survey Study.患者对胎儿染色体失衡的全基因组游离DNA筛查的偏好与理解:一项调查研究。
Prenat Diagn. 2025 Jul;45(8):994-1003. doi: 10.1002/pd.6842. Epub 2025 Jun 19.
2
Exploring Women's Experiences of Amniocentesis: A Qualitative Content Analysis.探索女性羊水穿刺的经历:一项质性内容分析
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2025 Jan 15;30(1):74-80. doi: 10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_107_23. eCollection 2025 Jan-Feb.
3
Factors influencing pregnant women's decision to accept or decline prenatal screening and diagnosis - a qualitative study.
影响孕妇接受或拒绝产前筛查与诊断决定的因素——一项定性研究
J Community Genet. 2024 Dec;15(6):711-721. doi: 10.1007/s12687-024-00746-3. Epub 2024 Nov 1.
4
Factors Influencing the Decision-Making Process for Undergoing Invasive Prenatal Testing.影响进行侵入性产前检测决策过程的因素。
Cureus. 2024 Apr 23;16(4):e58803. doi: 10.7759/cureus.58803. eCollection 2024 Apr.
5
Patient attitudes and preferences about expanded noninvasive prenatal testing.患者对扩展的非侵入性产前检测的态度和偏好。
Front Genet. 2023 Apr 18;14:976051. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.976051. eCollection 2023.
6
How do women want to receive information about non-invasive prenatal testing? Evidence from a discrete choice experiment.女性希望如何接收关于无创性产前检测的信息?来自离散选择实验的证据。
Prenat Diagn. 2022 Oct;42(11):1377-1389. doi: 10.1002/pd.6243. Epub 2022 Oct 2.
7
Multisite assessment of the impact of a prenatal testing educational App on patient knowledge and preparedness for prenatal testing decision making.多中心评估一款产前检测教育应用程序对患者知识及产前检测决策准备情况的影响。
J Community Genet. 2022 Aug;13(4):435-444. doi: 10.1007/s12687-022-00596-x. Epub 2022 Jun 10.
8
Decision-making factors in prenatal testing: A systematic review.产前检测中的决策因素:一项系统综述。
Health Psychol Open. 2021 Jan 13;8(1):2055102920987455. doi: 10.1177/2055102920987455. eCollection 2021 Jan-Jun.
9
Eliciting women's preference for prenatal testing in China: a discrete choice experiment.在中国引出女性对产前检测的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Oct 8;20(1):604. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03270-7.
10
Women's Attitudes Toward Invasive and Noninvasive Testing When Facing a High Risk of Fetal Down Syndrome.当面临胎儿唐氏综合征高风险时,女性对有创性和非侵入性检测的态度。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Mar 1;2(3):e191062. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.1062.