Nowotny Helga
European Research Council, Austria.
Public Underst Sci. 2014 Jan;23(1):16-20. doi: 10.1177/0963662513476220.
The current economic and financial crisis is also a political crisis that requires a rethinking of public engagement with science. In the past, the dominant focus of science, technology and society (STS) has led to a blind spot: political understanding and engagement of policy-makers and politicians with science, which is an integral part of any public engagement. Arguably, it is bound to and emerges from what Ezrahi calls collective political imaginaries. These are necessary fictions, which are causative and performative. In crude form, they manifest themselves in short-term impact measurements of every unit of scientific activity with citizens as the fictitious ultimate beneficiaries. In the future, STS can gain from coming up with a workable definition of the public interest with a focus on the public value of science. It can investigate collective imaginaries as they emerge from interactions with new media. As necessary fictions they may hold answers we never imagined them to hold.
当前的经济和金融危机也是一场政治危机,这需要重新思考公众与科学的互动。过去,科学、技术与社会(STS)的主导关注点导致了一个盲点:政策制定者和政治家对科学的政治理解与参与,而这是任何公众参与不可或缺的一部分。可以说,它必然源自且产生于埃兹拉希所称的集体政治想象。这些是必要的虚构之物,具有因果性和表演性。以粗略的形式,它们表现为将公民作为虚构的最终受益者,对每一项科学活动单元进行短期影响衡量。未来,STS可以通过提出一个可行的公共利益定义,重点关注科学的公共价值而有所收获。它可以研究随着与新媒体互动而产生的集体想象。作为必要的虚构之物,它们可能蕴含着我们从未想象过的答案。