Maayan Nicola, Soares-Weiser Karla, Lee Helen
Enhance Reviews Ltd, Central Office, Cobweb Buildings, The Lane, Lyford, Wantage, UK, OX12 0EE.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 16;2014(1):CD004396. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004396.pub3.
Caring for someone with dementia can be emotionally and physically demanding. Respite care is any intervention designed to give rest or relief to caregivers. It is not clear what positive and negative effects such care may have on them, or on people with dementia.
To assess the benefits and harms of respite care for people with dementia and their caregivers, in particular the effect of respite care on rates of institutionalisation.
The trials were identified from a search of ALOIS, the Specialized Register of the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group, using the terms respite* OR daycare OR caregiver* relief. ALOIS contains up-to-date records from all major healthcare databases and many ongoing trial databases.
Randomised controlled trials comparing respite care with a control intervention for people with dementia.
Two review authors carried out study selection independently and reached a consensus through discussion. Data were extracted by a single review author. The review authors contacted all investigators for methodological details not reported in the text and for additional data for three studies included in the previous version of the review.
Four trials are now included in the review, with 753 participants. They were different in many ways including the intervention, duration, outcomes and control group so pooling of data was not possible. Overall, the quality of the evidence was rated as very low. Re-analysis of outcomes using data from the published studies found no significant effects of respite care compared to no respite care on any caregiver variable. When respite care was compared to polarity therapy a significant effect was found in favour of polarity therapy for caregiver perceived stress (n = 38, MD 5.80, 95% CI 1.43 to 10.17), but not for other measures of psychological health and other caregiver outcomes. No studies reported evaluable data on outcomes related to the people with dementia.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence does not demonstrate any benefits or adverse effects from the use of respite care for people with dementia or their caregivers. These results should be treated with caution, however, as they may reflect the lack of high quality research in this area rather than an actual lack of benefit. Given the frequency with which respite care is advocated and provided, well-designed trials are needed in this area.
照顾患有痴呆症的人在情感和身体上都要求很高。喘息护理是旨在让照顾者得到休息或缓解的任何干预措施。目前尚不清楚这种护理对他们或对患有痴呆症的人可能有哪些正面和负面影响。
评估喘息护理对患有痴呆症的人及其照顾者的益处和危害,尤其是喘息护理对机构化比率的影响。
通过检索Cochrane痴呆与认知改善小组的专门注册库ALOIS来识别试验,检索词为respite* 或daycare 或caregiver* relief。ALOIS包含所有主要医疗保健数据库和许多正在进行的试验数据库的最新记录。
比较喘息护理与针对患有痴呆症的人的对照干预措施的随机对照试验。
两位综述作者独立进行研究选择,并通过讨论达成共识。数据由一位综述作者提取。综述作者联系了所有研究者,以获取文本中未报告的方法学细节以及该综述先前版本中纳入的三项研究的额外数据。
本综述现在纳入了四项试验,共753名参与者。它们在许多方面存在差异,包括干预措施、持续时间、结局和对照组,因此无法合并数据。总体而言,证据质量被评为极低。使用已发表研究的数据对结局进行重新分析发现,与无喘息护理相比,喘息护理对任何照顾者变量均无显著影响。当将喘息护理与极性疗法进行比较时,发现极性疗法对照顾者感知到的压力有显著效果(n = 38,MD 5.80,95%CI 1.43至10.17),但对心理健康的其他指标和其他照顾者结局则没有。没有研究报告与患有痴呆症的人相关结局的可评估数据。
目前的证据并未证明对患有痴呆症的人或其照顾者使用喘息护理有任何益处或不良影响。然而,这些结果应谨慎对待,因为它们可能反映了该领域缺乏高质量研究,而非实际没有益处。鉴于喘息护理被提倡和提供的频率,该领域需要精心设计的试验。