使用现有数据库。
Working with existing databases.
作者信息
Murphy Melissa, Alavi Karim, Maykel Justin
机构信息
Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts.
出版信息
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2013 Mar;26(1):5-11. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1333627.
Abstract
Outcomes research has established itself as an integral part of surgical research as physicians and hospitals are increasingly required to demonstrate attainment of performance markers and surgical safety indicators. Large-volume and clinical and administrative databases are used to study regional practice pattern variations, health care disparities, and resource utilization. Understanding the unique strengths and limitations of these large databases is critical to performing quality surgical outcomes research. In the current work, we review the currently available large-volume databases including selection processes, modes of analyses, data application, and limitations.
摘要
随着医生和医院越来越需要证明达到绩效指标和手术安全指标，结果研究已成为外科研究不可或缺的一部分。大容量以及临床和行政数据库被用于研究区域实践模式差异、医疗保健差距和资源利用情况。了解这些大型数据库的独特优势和局限性对于开展高质量的外科手术结果研究至关重要。在当前的工作中，我们回顾了目前可用的大容量数据库，包括选择过程、分析模式、数据应用和局限性。
相似文献
1
Working with existing databases.使用现有数据库。
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2013 Mar;26(1):5-11. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1333627.
3
Using existing data to address important clinical questions in critical care.利用现有数据解决重症监护中的重要临床问题。
Crit Care Med. 2013 Mar;41(3):886-96. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827bfc3c.
4
Regional administrative health registries as a resource in clinical epidemiologyA study of options, strengths, limitations and data quality provided with examples of use.区域行政卫生登记作为临床流行病学资源：对选项、优势、局限性及数据质量的研究，并举例说明其应用
Int J Risk Saf Med. 1997;10(1):1-22. doi: 10.3233/JRS-1997-10101.
5
Administrative databases.行政数据库。
Semin Pediatr Surg. 2018 Dec;27(6):353-360. doi: 10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2018.10.001. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性：一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
8
National Databases for Neurosurgical Outcomes Research: Options, Strengths, and Limitations.国家神经外科研结局研究数据库：选择、优势与局限性。
Neurosurgery. 2018 Sep 1;83(3):333-344. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyx408.
9
The Impact of Quality Variations on Patients Undergoing Surgery for Renal Cell Carcinoma: A National Cancer Database Study.质量变化对接受肾细胞癌手术患者的影响：国家癌症数据库研究。
Eur Urol. 2017 Sep;72(3):379-386. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.033. Epub 2017 May 13.
10
What is the value of routinely testing full blood count, electrolytes and urea, and pulmonary function tests before elective surgery in patients with no apparent clinical indication and in subgroups of patients with common comorbidities: a systematic review of the clinical and cost-effective literature.在没有明显临床指征的患者和常见合并症患者亚组中，在择期手术前常规检测全血细胞计数、电解质和尿素以及肺功能测试的价值：对临床和成本效益文献的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2012 Dec;16(50):i-xvi, 1-159. doi: 10.3310/hta16500.
引用本文的文献
1
Statewide Variation in Practices and Charges for Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax in Maryland, United States: A Retrospective Study.美国马里兰州原发性自发性气胸治疗方法与费用的全州差异：一项回顾性研究
J Chest Surg. 2025 Jan 5;58(1):34-43. doi: 10.5090/jcs.24.051. Epub 2024 Nov 18.
2
A retrospective study on the impact of radiotherapy on the survival outcomes of small cell lung cancer patients based on the SEER database.基于 SEER 数据库的放疗对小细胞肺癌患者生存结局影响的回顾性研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 5;14(1):15552. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65314-8.
3
A sampling strategy for longitudinal and cross-sectional analyses using a large national claims database.使用大型国家索赔数据库进行纵向和横断面分析的抽样策略。
Front Public Health. 2024 Feb 1;12:1257163. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1257163. eCollection 2024.
4
Exploration of the optimal number of regional lymph nodes removed for resected N0 NSCLC patients: A population-based study.切除的N0期非小细胞肺癌患者区域淋巴结清扫最佳数量的探索：一项基于人群的研究。
Front Oncol. 2022 Sep 29;12:1011091. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1011091. eCollection 2022.
5
Comparisons of prognosis prediction accuracy between modified and unmodified versions of 8 edition ypTNM.第8版ypTNM改良版与未改良版之间预后预测准确性的比较。
Ann Transl Med. 2022 May;10(10):600. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-2353.
6
Ridiculously good writing: How to write like a pro and publish like a boss.好到离谱的写作：如何像专业人士一样写作并像老板一样发表作品。
Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2022 Jun 10;42:101024. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2022.101024. eCollection 2022 Aug.
7
Advanced age is not the decisive factor in chemotherapy of small cell lung cancer: a population-based study.高龄不是小细胞肺癌化疗的决定因素：一项基于人群的研究。
Aging (Albany NY). 2022 Jun 8;14(11):4827-4838. doi: 10.18632/aging.204114.
8
Timing to surgery of Chiari malformation type 1 affects complication types: An analysis of 13,812 patients.1型Chiari畸形手术时机影响并发症类型：对13812例患者的分析
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2020 Jul-Sep;11(3):232-236. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_67_20. Epub 2020 Aug 14.
9
Hospital teaching status on the outcomes of patients with esophageal variceal bleeding in the United States.美国医院教学对食管静脉曲张出血患者治疗结果的影响
World J Hepatol. 2020 Jun 27;12(6):288-297. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v12.i6.288.
10
Big Data vs. Clinical Trials in HPB Surgery.大数据与肝胆外科临床试验的比较。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 May;24(5):1127-1137. doi: 10.1007/s11605-020-04536-3. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
本文引用的文献
1
Mortality by stage for right- versus left-sided colon cancer: analysis of surveillance, epidemiology, and end results--Medicare data.右侧结肠癌与左侧结肠癌的各期死亡率：监测、流行病学和最终结果——医疗保险数据的分析。
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Nov 20;29(33):4401-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.36.4414. Epub 2011 Oct 3.
2
Colectomy performance improvement within NSQIP 2005-2008.2005-2008 年 NSQIP 中结肠切除术的绩效改善。
J Surg Res. 2011 Nov;171(1):e9-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2011.06.052. Epub 2011 Jul 23.
3
Short-term outcomes after laparoscopic-assisted proctectomy for rectal cancer: results from the ACS NSQIP.腹腔镜辅助直肠癌根治术的短期疗效：来自 ACS NSQIP 的结果。
J Am Coll Surg. 2011 May;212(5):844-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.01.005. Epub 2011 Mar 16.
4
A review for clinical outcomes research: hypothesis generation, data strategy, and hypothesis-driven statistical analysis.临床结果研究述评：假说生成、数据策略和假说驱动的统计分析。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Jul;25(7):2254-60. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1543-7. Epub 2011 Feb 27.
5
Outcomes research in pediatric surgery. Part 1: overview and resources.小儿外科学的结局研究。第 1 部分：概述和资源。
J Pediatr Surg. 2011 Jan;46(1):221-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.09.096.
6
Development of an American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program: morbidity and mortality risk calculator for colorectal surgery.美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划的发展：结直肠手术的发病率和死亡率风险计算器
J Am Coll Surg. 2009 Jun;208(6):1009-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.01.043. Epub 2009 Apr 17.
7
Blueprint for a new American College of Surgeons: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.美国外科医师学会新蓝图：国家外科质量改进计划
J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Nov;207(5):777-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.07.018. Epub 2008 Sep 19.
8
Certification and maintenance of certification in surgery.外科手术认证及认证维护
Surg Clin North Am. 2007 Aug;87(4):825-36, vi. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2007.06.004.
9
Racial disparities in late survival after rectal cancer surgery.直肠癌手术后晚期生存的种族差异。
J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Dec;203(6):787-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.08.005. Epub 2006 Oct 25.
10
Strategies for improving surgical quality--should payers reward excellence or effort?提高手术质量的策略——支付方应该奖励卓越表现还是努力程度？
N Engl J Med. 2006 Feb 23;354(8):864-70. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb053364.
Zotero 插件