Suppr超能文献

慢性压迫性神经病变行视神经减压术后视力恢复的预测因素:系统评价与Meta分析

Predictive factors for vision recovery after optic nerve decompression for chronic compressive neuropathy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Carlson Andrew P, Stippler Martina, Myers Orrin

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States.

Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States.

出版信息

J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2013 Feb;74(1):20-38. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1329624. Epub 2012 Nov 26.

Abstract

Objectives Surgical optic nerve decompression for chronic compressive neuropathy results in variable success of vision improvement. We sought to determine the effects of various factors using meta-analysis of available literature. Design Systematic review of MEDLINE databases for the period 1990 to 2010. Setting Academic research center. Participants Studies reporting patients with vision loss from chronic compressive neuropathy undergoing surgery. Main outcome measures Vision outcome reported by each study. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for predictor variables were calculated. Overall odds ratios were then calculated for each factor, adjusting for inter study heterogeneity. Results Seventy-six studies were identified. Factors with a significant odds of improvement were: less severe vision loss (OR 2.31[95% CI = 1.76 to 3.04]), no disc atrophy (OR 2.60 [95% CI = 1.17 to 5.81]), smaller size (OR 1.82 [95% CI = 1.22 to 2.73]), primary tumor resection (not recurrent) (OR 3.08 [95% CI = 1.84 to 5.14]), no cavernous sinus extension (OR 1.88 [95% CI = 1.03 to 3.43]), soft consistency (OR 4.91 [95% CI = 2.27 to 10.63]), presence of arachnoid plane (OR 5.60 [95% CI = 2.08 to 15.07]), and more extensive resection (OR 0.61 [95% CI = 0.4 to 0.93]). Conclusions Ophthalmologic factors and factors directly related to the lesion are most important in determining vision outcome. The decision to perform optic nerve decompression for vision loss should be made based on careful examination of the patient and realistic discussion regarding the probability of improvement.

摘要

目的 对于慢性压迫性神经病变进行手术视神经减压术,视力改善的成功率各不相同。我们试图通过对现有文献进行荟萃分析来确定各种因素的影响。

设计 对1990年至2010年期间的MEDLINE数据库进行系统评价。

地点 学术研究中心。

参与者 报告慢性压迫性神经病变导致视力丧失并接受手术的患者的研究。

主要结局指标 每项研究报告的视力结果。计算预测变量的优势比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)。然后针对每个因素计算总体优势比,并对研究间的异质性进行校正。

结果 共识别出76项研究。视力改善优势显著的因素包括:视力丧失程度较轻(OR 2.31[95%CI=1.76至3.04])、无视盘萎缩(OR 2.60[95%CI=1.17至5.81])、肿瘤体积较小(OR 1.82[95%CI=1.22至2.73])、原发性肿瘤切除(非复发性)(OR 3.08[95%CI=1.84至5.14])、无海绵窦侵犯(OR 1.88[95%CI=1.03至3.43])、质地柔软(OR 4.91[95%CI=2.27至10.63])、存在蛛网膜平面(OR 5.60[95%CI=2.08至15.07])以及切除范围更广(OR 0.61[95%CI=0.4至0.93])。

结论 在决定视力结果方面,眼科因素和与病变直接相关的因素最为重要。对于因视力丧失而进行视神经减压术的决策,应基于对患者的仔细检查以及关于改善可能性的现实讨论来做出。

相似文献

1
Predictive factors for vision recovery after optic nerve decompression for chronic compressive neuropathy: systematic review and meta-analysis.
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2013 Feb;74(1):20-38. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1329624. Epub 2012 Nov 26.
2
[Transcranial microsurgical decompression of the optic canal in surgical treatment of meningiomas of the sellar region].
Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko. 2020;84(3):61-73. doi: 10.17116/neiro20208403161.
4
Optic nerve decompression for compressive neuropathy secondary to neoplasia.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997 Apr;123(4):425-9. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1997.01900040061010.
5
Surgery for nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jan 18;1:CD001538. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001538.pub3.
6
Visual recovery following optic nerve decompression for chronic compressive neuropathy.
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2009 Apr;151(4):325-34. doi: 10.1007/s00701-009-0192-x. Epub 2009 Mar 3.
7
Surgery for nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(2):CD001538. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001538.
9
Outcome of the surgical decompression for traumatic optic neuropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Neurosurg Rev. 2021 Apr;44(2):633-641. doi: 10.1007/s10143-020-01260-z. Epub 2020 Feb 22.
10
Surgical orbital decompression for thyroid eye disease.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Dec 7(12):CD007630. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007630.pub2.

引用本文的文献

2
Surgical treatment of tuberculum sellae meningioma: A retrospective review of single institutional experience.
Surg Neurol Int. 2024 Nov 29;15:440. doi: 10.25259/SNI_685_2024. eCollection 2024.
4
Reversal of Sudden Blindness as a Consequence of Isolated Sphenoid Sinus Mucocele: A Case Report and Literature Review.
Cureus. 2024 Jun 11;16(6):e62158. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62158. eCollection 2024 Jun.
5
Outcome of Visual Function after Removal of Tuberculum Sellae Meningioma Presenting with Scotoma at the Lower Visual Field Center.
NMC Case Rep J. 2024 Feb 14;11:55-59. doi: 10.2176/jns-nmc.2023-0234. eCollection 2024.
10
Primary and Secondary Optic Nerve Sheath Meningioma.
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2021 Feb;82(1):27-71. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1723801. Epub 2021 Feb 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Early outcomes of endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for adult craniopharyngiomas.
Neurosurg Focus. 2010 Apr;28(4):E9. doi: 10.3171/2010.1.FOCUS09319.
3
Primary optic nerve sheath meningiomas: a follow-up study.
Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2010 Aug;71(3):126-33. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1246136. Epub 2010 Feb 1.
4
The transsphenoidal resection of pediatric craniopharyngiomas: a case series.
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2010 Jan;5(1):49-60. doi: 10.3171/2009.7.PEDS09252.
5
Efficacy and safety of radical resection of primary and recurrent craniopharyngiomas in 86 children.
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2010 Jan;5(1):30-48. doi: 10.3171/2009.7.PEDS09215.
6
Modified orbitozygomatic craniotomy for craniopharyngioma resection in children.
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2009 Oct;4(4):345-52. doi: 10.3171/2009.5.PEDS09106.
7
Determinants of postoperative visual recovery in suprasellar meningiomas.
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2010 Jan;152(1):69-77. doi: 10.1007/s00701-009-0492-1. Epub 2009 Aug 26.
9
Fronto-basal interhemispheric approach for tuberculum sellae meningiomas; long-term visual outcome.
Br J Neurosurg. 2009 Aug;23(4):422-30. doi: 10.1080/02688690902968836.
10
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验