Suppr超能文献

带猪尾巴导管的大型自发性气胸门诊管理。

Ambulatory management of large spontaneous pneumothorax with pigtail catheters.

机构信息

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Pontchaillou Hospital, Rennes 1 University, Rennes, France; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Bretagne Sud, Lorient, France.

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Bretagne Sud, Lorient, France.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 2014 Sep;64(3):222-8. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.12.017. Epub 2014 Jan 15.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

There is no consensus about the management of large spontaneous pneumothoraces. Guidelines recommend either needle aspiration or chest tube drainage and most patients are hospitalized. We assess the efficiency of ambulatory management of large spontaneous pneumothoraces with pigtail catheters.

METHODS

From February 2007 to January 2011, all primary and secondary large spontaneous pneumothoraces from Lorient's hospital (France) were managed with pigtail catheters with a 1-way valve. The patients were discharged immediately and then evaluated every 2 days according to a specific algorithm.

RESULTS

Of the 132 consecutive patients (110 primary, 22 secondary), 103 were exclusively managed as outpatients, with full resolution of the pneumothorax by day 2 or 4, which represents an ambulatory success rate of 78%. Mean time (SD) of drainage was 3.4 days (1.8). Seven patients were initially hospitalized but quickly discharged and had full resolution by day 2 or 4, leading to a total success rate of 83%. The use of analgesics was low. The 1-year recurrence rate was 26%. If successful, this outpatient management is potentially cost saving, with a mean cost of $926, assuming up to 2 outpatient visits and 1 chest radiograph, compared with $4,276 if a chest tube was placed and the patient was admitted to the hospital for 4 days.

CONCLUSION

Ambulatory management with pigtail catheters with 1-way valves could be a reasonable first-line of treatment for large spontaneous pneumothoraces. Compared with that of other studies, our protocol does not require hospitalization and is cost saving.

摘要

研究目的

对于自发性大量气胸,目前尚无统一的治疗方法。指南推荐使用胸腔穿刺或胸腔引流,且多数患者需住院治疗。我们评估了使用猪尾导管行门诊管理自发性大量气胸的效果。

方法

2007 年 2 月至 2011 年 1 月,法国洛里昂医院收治的所有原发性和继发性大量自发性气胸患者均使用带有单向活瓣的猪尾导管进行治疗。患者立即出院,然后根据特定的算法每 2 天进行一次评估。

结果

在 132 例连续患者中(110 例原发性,22 例继发性),103 例患者仅作为门诊患者进行管理,气胸在第 2 或第 4 天完全缓解,门诊治疗成功率为 78%。引流的平均时间(标准差)为 3.4 天(1.8)。7 例患者最初住院,但很快出院,在第 2 或第 4 天完全缓解,总成功率为 83%。镇痛药的使用量较低。1 年复发率为 26%。如果成功,这种门诊管理可能具有成本效益,假设最多进行 2 次门诊就诊和 1 次胸部 X 线检查,与放置胸腔引流管并将患者住院 4 天相比,可节省 926 美元的平均费用。

结论

使用带有单向活瓣的猪尾导管进行门诊管理可能是治疗自发性大量气胸的合理一线治疗方法。与其他研究相比,我们的方案不需要住院,且具有成本效益。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验