Suppr超能文献

门诊管理继发性自发性气胸的安全性和有效性:病例系列研究。

Safety and efficacy of ambulatory management of secondary spontaneous pneumothorax: a case series.

机构信息

Respiratory Medicine, Kettering General Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Kettering, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open Respir Res. 2019 Feb 28;6(1):e000373. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2018-000373. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The optimal management of pneumothorax remains undefined. There is a growing consensus that patients with spontaneous pneumothorax can be considered for ambulatory management with the use of a one-way valve. Despite this, there is little data on the outcomes of outpatient management of secondary spontaneous pneumothorax (SSP).

METHODS

At our institution, selected patients with primary and secondary spontaneous pneumothorax who meet the predefined local criteria are managed on an ambulatory pathway. We prospectively evaluated our practice over a 3-year period and explore outcomes of patients with SSP using primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) as a comparator group.

RESULTS

163 consecutive patients presenting to our hospital between September 2014 and July 2017 were evaluated using a predefined protocol. 111 (49 SSP and 62 PSP) were deemed suitable for outpatient management. Resolution on day 5 was similar between the two groups (65% in the SSP vs 79% in the PSP group; p=0.108). The mean drainage time was 5.84 days in SSP compared with 5.69 days in PSP, representing a difference of 0.15 days (95% CI -2.47 to 2.16; p=0.897). Complications such as infection and drain blockage/falling-out were scarce, with comparable pain and satisfaction scores across both groups. There were no deaths during this period. An estimated £86 796 ($113 920) was saved over the study period, equating to £1118.80 ($1550) per patient.

DISCUSSION

This study suggests that outpatient management of selected patients with SSP may be effective, safe and cost-saving.

摘要

引言

气胸的最佳治疗方法仍未确定。越来越多的人认为,自发性气胸患者可以使用单向阀进行门诊管理。尽管如此,关于继发性自发性气胸(SSP)门诊管理的结果数据却很少。

方法

在我们的机构中,符合当地预设标准的原发性和继发性自发性气胸患者,如果符合条件,可通过门诊途径进行管理。我们前瞻性地评估了我们在 3 年期间的实践,并使用原发性自发性气胸(PSP)作为对照组,探讨了 SSP 患者的结局。

结果

2014 年 9 月至 2017 年 7 月期间,我院共评估了 163 例连续患者,使用预设方案。其中 111 例(49 例 SSP 和 62 例 PSP)适合门诊管理。两组患者第 5 天的缓解率相似(SSP 组为 65%,PSP 组为 79%;p=0.108)。SSP 的平均引流时间为 5.84 天,而 PSP 为 5.69 天,差异为 0.15 天(95%置信区间-2.47 至 2.16;p=0.897)。感染和引流管堵塞/脱落等并发症很少见,两组患者的疼痛和满意度评分相当。在此期间无死亡病例。研究期间估计节省了 86796 英镑(113920 美元),相当于每位患者节省 1118.80 英镑(1550 美元)。

讨论

本研究表明,对选定的 SSP 患者进行门诊管理可能是有效、安全且节省成本的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cf3/6424293/4ee1901c74d7/bmjresp-2018-000373f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验