Suppr超能文献

比较甲氨蝶呤联合生物制剂与单独使用甲氨蝶呤或生物制剂治疗成人早期类风湿关节炎的疗效:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。

Comparative Effectiveness of Combining MTX with Biologic Drug Therapy Versus Either MTX or Biologics Alone for Early Rheumatoid Arthritis in Adults: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

机构信息

University of North Carolina Department of Family Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Cecil G Sheps Center for Health Services Research, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Oct;34(10):2232-2245. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05230-0. Epub 2019 Aug 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Comparative effectiveness of early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatments remains uncertain.

PURPOSE

Compare benefits and harms of biologic drug therapies for adults with early RA within 1 year of diagnosis.

DATA SOURCES

English language articles from the 2012 review to October 2017 identified through MEDLINE, Cochrane Library and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, gray literature, expert recommendations, reference lists of published literature, and supplemental evidence data requests.

STUDY SELECTION

Two persons independently selected studies based on predefined inclusion criteria.

DATA EXTRACTION

One reviewer extracted data; a second reviewer checked accuracy. Two independent reviewers assigned risk of bias ratings.

DATA SYNTHESIS

We identified 22 eligible studies with 9934 participants. Combination therapy with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) or non-TNF biologics plus methotrexate (MTX) improved disease control, remission, and functional capacity compared with monotherapy of either MTX or a biologic. Network meta-analyses found higher ACR50 response (50% improvement) for combination therapy of biologic plus MTX than for MTX monotherapy (relative risk range 1.20 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.04 to 1.38] to 1.57 [95% CI, 1.30 to 1.88]). No significant differences emerged between treatment discontinuation rates because of adverse events or serious adverse events. Subgroup data (disease activity, prior therapy, demographics, serious conditions) were limited.

LIMITATIONS

Trials enrolled almost exclusively selected populations with high disease activity. Network meta-analyses were derived from indirect comparisons relative to MTX due to the dearth of head-to-head studies comparing interventions. No eligible data on biosimilars were found.

CONCLUSIONS

Qualitative and network meta-analyses suggest that the combination of MTX with TNF or non-TNF biologics reduces disease activity and improves remission when compared with MTX monotherapy. Overall adverse event and discontinuation rates were similar between treatment groups.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO (available at http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?ID=CRD42017079260 ).

摘要

背景

早期类风湿关节炎(RA)治疗的比较效果仍不确定。

目的

在诊断后 1 年内,比较生物药物疗法治疗成人早期 RA 的益处和危害。

数据来源

2012 年综述至 2017 年 10 月期间通过 MEDLINE、Cochrane 图书馆和国际药学文摘、灰色文献、专家建议、已发表文献的参考文献列表以及补充证据数据请求检索到的英文文章。

研究选择

两名人员根据预先确定的纳入标准独立选择研究。

数据提取

一名评审员提取数据;第二名评审员检查准确性。两名独立评审员对偏倚风险进行评分。

数据综合

我们确定了 22 项符合条件的研究,共 9934 名参与者。与 MTX 单药治疗或生物制剂单药治疗相比,TNF 或非-TNF 生物制剂联合 MTX 的联合治疗可改善疾病控制、缓解和功能能力。网络荟萃分析发现,生物制剂联合 MTX 的 ACR50 反应(改善 50%)高于 MTX 单药治疗(相对风险范围 1.20[95%置信区间(CI),1.04 至 1.38]至 1.57[95%CI,1.30 至 1.88])。由于不良事件或严重不良事件而导致的治疗中断率没有显著差异。亚组数据(疾病活动度、既往治疗、人口统计学、严重情况)有限。

局限性

试验主要纳入了疾病活动度高的特定人群。由于缺乏比较干预措施的头对头研究,网络荟萃分析是基于 MTX 的间接比较得出的。没有找到关于生物仿制药的合格数据。

结论

定性和网络荟萃分析表明,与 MTX 单药治疗相比,MTX 联合 TNF 或非-TNF 生物制剂可降低疾病活动度并改善缓解。治疗组之间的总体不良事件和停药率相似。

注册

PROSPERO(可在 http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?ID=CRD42017079260 获得)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验