[Mitral valve repair versus mitral valve replacement].

Over the past 40 years mitral valve surgery has changed dramatically. After initial enthusiasm with the introduction of valve prostheses in the 1960s, a renewed interest in repair techniques began in the 1970s with the introduction of annuloplasty rings. These repair techniques revealed that the integrity of the subvalvular apparatus plays an important role in left ventricular function. When considering the major series comparing early and late results of mitral valve repair versus prosthetic mitral valve replacement, operative mortality rate is lower for patients with mitral valve repair. Long-term results also show a superior survival rate after mitral valve reconstruction. In addition, several problems can occur with the prosthetic valve, such as thromboembolism and endocarditis. All of these factors favor valve repair over replacement. The success of mitral valve repair depends on many factors: etiology of the mitral valve disease and the resultant pathomorphology of the valve, patient's circumstances such as age or contraindication for anticoagulation, and the experience of the surgeon. The decision whether to repair or replace the mitral valve depends on these factors. Data in the literature and in large collective databases reflect the advantages of mitral valve repair, with over 75 % of current mitral valve surgeries being repairs.In the past 5 years the exposure of the mitral valve through a right lateral minithoracotomy using video assistance has developed into a widespread technique. This approach allows complex mitral valve repair as well as mitral valve replacement even with biological stentless prostheses, with decreased morbidity. The addition of radiofrequency ablation for restoration of sinus rhythm enhances the outcome after mitral valve surgery, and can also be easily performed through a minithoracotomy technique.