Wang Tao, Cui Yun-liang, Chu Zhi-xiang, Liu Jie, Ban Yu, Li Tan-shi
Department of Emergency, Hainan Branch of PLA General Hospital, Sanya 572000, Hainan, China. Corresponding author: Ban Yu, Email:
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2013 Dec;25(12):729-33. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2013.12.008.
To investigate the values of factors based on PIRO conception in predicting the prognosis of critical patients.
The clinical data of critical patients admitted to Hainan Branch of PLA General Hospital from December 2011 to August 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were randomly divided into non-survivors and survivors groups according to 28-day outcome. Predisposition (P), injury (I), response (R) and organ dysfunction induced by injury (O) were compared between two groups. The indexes with statistical significance (P<0.2) by univariate analysis were included in multivariate logistic regression analysis, and the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve) was plotted to evaluate the values of factors based on PIRO conception in predicting the prognosis of critical patients.
One hundred and eighty-seven critical patients were enrolled, and among them 75 (40.1%) patients died. Univariate analysis showed that the age, underlying disease scores, history of cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, and cerebrovascular disease, positive blood culture, whether or not complicated with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) or severe sepsis/septic shock, procalcitonin (PCT), acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II), acute pathophysiology score (APS) and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) were found to be the factors related with the prognosis (all P<0.2). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the underlying disease scores [odds ratio (OR)=1.874, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) 1.138-3.084, P=0.014], whether patients occurrence of severe sepsis/septic shock (OR=0.167, 95%CI 0.064-0.435, P=0.000) and SOFA scores (OR=1.498, 95%CI 1.283-1.750, P=0.000) were independent factors for predicting 28-day mortality. The new model combined with above factors had more prognostic value in predicting the mortality than a single variable. The area under ROC curve (AUC) for PIRO model based on indexes with statistical significance by univariate analysis was 0.877 (0.821-0.934), P=0.000. AUC for PIRO model based on underlying disease scores, severe sepsis/septic shock, SOFA scores was 0.871 (0.814-0.928), P=0.000. AUC for SOFA was 0.762 (0.687-0.837), P=0.000. AUC for APS was 0.726 (0.647-0.805), P=0.000. AUC for underlying disease scores was 0.678 (0.593-0.763), P=0.000. AUC for PCT was 0.636 (0.548-0.724), P=0.004. AUC for age was 0.618 (0.532-0.705), P=0.013].
The multivariate regression analysis based on PIRO system may help to predict 28 days mortality in critical patients.
探讨基于PIRO概念的因素对危重症患者预后的预测价值。
回顾性分析2011年12月至2013年8月解放军总医院海南分院收治的危重症患者的临床资料。根据28天结局将患者随机分为非存活组和存活组。比较两组患者的易感性(P)、损伤(I)、反应(R)和损伤诱导的器官功能障碍(O)。将单因素分析中有统计学意义(P<0.2)的指标纳入多因素logistic回归分析,并绘制受试者工作特征曲线(ROC曲线),以评估基于PIRO概念的因素对危重症患者预后的预测价值。
共纳入187例危重症患者,其中75例(40.1%)死亡。单因素分析显示,年龄、基础疾病评分、心血管疾病史、糖尿病史、脑血管疾病史、血培养阳性、是否合并急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)或严重脓毒症/脓毒性休克、降钙素原(PCT)、急性生理与慢性健康状况评价II(APACHE II)、急性病理生理学评分(APS)和序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)是与预后相关的因素(均P<0.2)。多因素logistic回归分析显示,基础疾病评分[比值比(OR)=1.874,95%置信区间(95%CI)1.138 - 3.084,P=0.014]、患者是否发生严重脓毒症/脓毒性休克(OR=0.167,95%CI 0.064 - 0.435,P=0.000)和SOFA评分(OR=1.498,95%CI 1.283 - 1.750,P=0.000)是预测28天死亡率的独立因素。结合上述因素的新模型在预测死亡率方面比单一变量具有更高的预后价值。基于单因素分析中有统计学意义的指标构建的PIRO模型的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)为0.877(0.821 - 0.934),P=0.000。基于基础疾病评分、严重脓毒症/脓毒性休克、SOFA评分构建的PIRO模型的AUC为0.871(0.814 - 0.928),P=0.000。SOFA的AUC为0.762(0.687 - 0.837),P=0.000。APS的AUC为0.726(0.647 - 0.805),P=0.000。基础疾病评分的AUC为0.678(0.593 - 0.763),P=0.000。PCT的AUC为0.636(0.548 - 0.724),P=0.004。年龄的AUC为0.618(0.532 - 0.705),P=0.013]。
基于PIRO系统的多因素回归分析有助于预测危重症患者的28天死亡率。